5
handpeople 5 points ago +5 / -0

So he can withhold his vote on any spending bill that does not cut FBI funds. I am sick of hearing these poor puppies getting shafted by the FBI.

3
handpeople 3 points ago +3 / -0

Whenever it does not come to fruition, they claim Q never said that. Never said sessions was our guy, never said anything about 10 days of larpness.

2
handpeople 2 points ago +2 / -0

EXACTLY ^^^^^ Make sure to vote for Romney in 2024 too.

2
handpeople 2 points ago +2 / -0

We will fix it next time... Good thing we stopped Russia this time though, here is a pat on the back.

10
handpeople 10 points ago +10 / -0

Dont know why they keep pressing this, we have enough evidence with the amount of ballots adjudicated being out of whack. Shit like this will take years to prove. We dont even have subpoena power. Rudy needs to stay focused on what we can win before the 6th.

2
handpeople 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not even scholars. We simply do not have the background to litigate this on message boards. I just rack it up to... Maybe this can be done.

3
handpeople 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ive heard, but its a legal theory. Can't get my head around the process of rejecting and who has ultimate authority.

1
handpeople 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dems... We have checks and balances in our election system to ensure democracy Also Dems... If you check or balance our elections, you are undermining democracy.

1
handpeople 1 point ago +1 / -0

Still waiting for what to do if he concedes, because, I dont know. So right now, my honest answer is NOTHING. I am not into lone wolf shit.

1
handpeople 1 point ago +2 / -1

Its primarily white people who are behind such thing as "allowing these garbage third-world people to vote in elections". White people get no quarter in all this, in fact the vast majority of the people wrecking shit are white.

2
handpeople 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just as good as the shields on the enterprise

1
handpeople 1 point ago +1 / -0

Our resistance will need to build up. I wish we had one, we really don't. I definitely think it will materialize eventually.

1
handpeople 1 point ago +3 / -2

It all comes down to this. Thats why SCOTUS ultimately ruled against TX. They first and foremost, try to keep the country stable. They decided only one side could win, the other could go get fucked, and deliberately made the decision that conservatives getting fucked is the safe bet. When they talk of disenfranchising voters, its disenfranchising democrat voters, no concern for the other 50%+ of Republican voters.

0
handpeople 0 points ago +2 / -2

Because there is a very good chance Biden will be POTUS. Trump knows this, his language has been nothing but suggestive of the real possibility. This is a serious fight, we are not guaranteed to win. At this point in time, odds are against us. Much more needs to happen to secure this election.

51
handpeople 51 points ago +51 / -0

Still if the state legislature doesnt de-certify, this wont matter at all. Its ALL on the state legislators.

6
handpeople 6 points ago +6 / -0

Its not just people who did not make it clear, it was the system. 94% in Fulton County went to adjudication. No audit trail.

5
handpeople 5 points ago +5 / -0

Part of the deal was the 2 GOP Senators will win.

5
handpeople 5 points ago +5 / -0

After he said, foreign adversaries will try to compromise the 2020 elections, he now says, even having this hearing is a danger to democracy.

1
handpeople 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why? The 2 GA Senators are in the bag, Dominion machines will make sure of it. It was part of the deal.

5
handpeople 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thats really one of the elephants in the room. Ok, so this doesnt happen across the board, did not in prior elections. So, in 6 states counting stops shortly after GOP observers are kicked out. When they return, Biden has come from an insurmountable loss, to an insurmountable win. I dont care what side you are on, this raises serious red flags. Just these facts alone.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›