9
handpeople 9 points ago +9 / -0

LOL, it was rigged as fucking hell and you have to be blind not to see that.

4
handpeople 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think there is merit to the idea he is pulling together a coalition. Few people realize how important Japan is, Japan is the key to the kingdom. Without it we would not have the ability to project force into China if needed.

2
handpeople 2 points ago +2 / -0

HAHAHAHAHA It actually looks legit. Code checked in 2012 cant make that up on github. Has smartmatic namespaces. Back in 2012, nobody secured their source repos on github, they were pretty much all public. So, yes this source code appears to actually be linked to smartmatic. Its old though, so likely not what is on machines in full.

2
handpeople 2 points ago +2 / -0

Throw back to legislators. SCOTUS would never pick a president.

1
handpeople 1 point ago +2 / -1

No, there will not be an insurrection act. People can continue to believe that, but its not withing the realm of possibility.

1
handpeople 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, its the truth. We have a conservative majority, but a conservative argument may indeed be made for not intervening in the way states conduct elections.

0
handpeople 0 points ago +1 / -1

There is a good chance SCOTUS unwilling to intervene in the way states conduct elections. Its a valid point whether we like it or not.

1
handpeople 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thats what I am thinking. I think SCOTUS will hear the case, but I am also not convinced as conservatives they will intervene in state elections. I still think its a long shot. Even if it gets tossed to legislatures, I think enough will cuck out for Biden. Only takes a few RINOS, and there are more than just a few in all these state legislatures.

1
handpeople 1 point ago +1 / -0

Probably better to threaten boycotts against the advertisers.

4
handpeople 4 points ago +4 / -0

Or the 28% bodyfat accumulated around their waste, average woman in the US in now 5'4" at 165lbs

7
handpeople 7 points ago +7 / -0

If SCOTUS wont hear this, or rules unfavorably, the only chance we have is damning evidence of election fraud (which so far they have ignored), which would lead to new hearings based on circumstances that we do not know of. SCOTUS has treated Constitution like a ceremonial paper many times in the past, they could do it here as well, that wont change anything, courts will continue to pretend the Constitution is important when it suits their desired outcome.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›