We should all support an honest 'audit'. The challenge is how to have an honest one. Although imperfect, the best way, I believe, is to have a public 'trial' by jury. I doubt anything done by Congress in 10 days would even come close. Witnesses, evidence, cross-examination,...and let the public decide?
I oppose the left. I try to tolerate establishment Republicans because with them we can sometimes hold off the left. I support conservatives including many Republicans, conservative Libertarians, and a few conservative independents and Democrats. I wish we had a well-organized, well-funded, and effective Constitutional Party, but we don't. For me, that's why.
Here's a list of the AZ GOP legislators email addresses you can cut and paste:
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
But affidavits are acceptable to establish probable cause before a judge or a grand jury. Is probable cause to believe a massive fraud has been attempted acceptable to ask a judge to pause action to permit examination of the facts?
Would an unbiased judge refuse to hear the facts?
Not a lawyer
"...getting those cheat machines out of our elections..."
Not just the machines but 1) The 1000s of Swamp Traitors who will eventually be tried and convicted of the massive, international fraud upon the 2020 US election and 2) The public shaming of the DNC and all Democrat politicians.
What a legacy!
The media hide the truth for the rest of the establishment.