Three reasons with some merit, but I do not think they suffice:

1. Courts should not get involved in politics.

2. Politics is a dirty business; let the politicians find a political solution.

3. Cases should first come up through local and state civil and criminal courts.

What do you think?

Title says it all.

Crickets

It will be interesting to see if any of the Sunday talk shows touch it. Also, how questions are handled in any WH or Admin press conferences. Joe Hiden is back in the cellar in Delaware.

Can Congress introduce evidence into the Congressional Record during debate on Contested Electors? If so, all of the evidence of all of the fraud in all states can be made public as part of the congressional record. The threat of this could certainly influence a number of votes on seating electors by those who wish the evidence to be suppressed. Also, that would 'drain the swamp' even if Trump is not reelected.

Title says it all.

– Belleoffreedom 18 minutes ago +1 / -0 I am looking forward to having the slow-rolling voting machine scandal dealt with. I admire the hell out of the way DJT has governed, but getting those cheat machines out of our elections will be his most far-reaching accomplishment, surpassing even the appointment of so many judges and justices. Imagine any other past president trying to deal with this situation.

– hdcochran 1 minutes ago +1 / -0 "...getting those cheat machines out of our elections..." Not just the machines but 1) The 1000s of Swamp Traitors who will eventually be tried and convicted of the massive, international fraud upon the 2020 US election and 2) The public shaming of the DNC and all Democrat politicians.

What a legacy!

1. Win Election

This one is time-critical; it must go to SCOTUS. Only validated evidence now in hand: Mostly lost, stolen, invalid ballots, etc.; observer obstruction; procedural errors; and things of this nature. Relies on witness statements. Rudy and Trump Legal Team handle this. The biggest challenge is getting it absolutely right in days.

2. Prosecute Traitors

This will take a long time (years?). Maybe 100s of cases in dozens of courts. They will be built around the esoteric computer hardware and software evidence. Complex international issues, too. Named parties can sue, delay, etc. Sidney and Lin handle this. Biggest challenge is presenting it understandably to a jury.

Clearly, 1 and 2 must be legally separate and cannot be entangled because of meeting different challenges and timeframes.

It was clearly the most important US news of the week. If they did not cover it, that is the second biggest.

If not, when?

I believe the evidence will prove and the Supreme Court would eventually decide that the elections in a sufficient number of states were fraudulent. Can this realistically happen in time for state legislators to reject the chosen Electors?

Browsing New TDW Posts on Safari. I click a post, read it, and wish to return back to the place where I was. I sometimes end up at the very latest New post and have to find my place. Other times I end up back at the top of Hot. Is there a way to simply return the place where I was?

Thanks.

The obvious reason is Biden gets headlines every day without doing anything. That's what he's done for decades.

Chief Justice Roberts has voted questionably in several recent Supreme Court decisions. Usually it seems these votes aimed to keep the Court out of political issues which are more properly the purview of the other two branches of the government. Justice is intended to be based on the constitution and the law. Since those votes were based on neither constitution nor law, they were political themselves.

I believe we should oppose such votes on substantive arguments such as this and not just because we oppose the political results. Can you strengthen my argument or propose other substantive arguments?

I am thoroughly informed on the published 'facts' of the Gen. Flynn case. The 'facts' strongly indicate that the FBI and DOJ acted outside standard procedures and perhaps feloniously to entrap and prosecute Gen. Flynn. The 'facts' strongly indicate that Gen. Flynn's initial attorneys acted unethically to aid the FBI/DOJ prosecution of Gen. Flynn. The 'facts' strongly indicate that Gen. Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI. Other 'facts' suggest that the FBI/DOJ coerced Gen. Flynn's guilty plea by threatening action against his son.

I think there should be a criminal investigation of the actions of the FBI and DOJ, of Gen. Flynn's initial lawyers, and of Gen. Flynn in this case. Until the facts are ascertained, I tend to support Gen. Flynn because of what I know of his past and what I believe about those who put him in this situation. You may make your own decisions. I hope we can find the right resolution.

If a non-citizen votes in my district it robs from a citizen of the district his/her vote.

PROVE I'M WRONG

Here are three things I have read recently. Can anyone verify if they are/are not facts? Sources?

1. According to law, states bear primary responsibility to maintain preparedness for coping with emergencies.

2. A while ago Gov Cuomo declined to purchase thousands (16,000?) ventilators and spent the appropriation on other items.

3. New York just revealed that they had just discovered thousands of ventilators, sent by the federal government, in storage but not distributed.

The data are sparse and imperfect and the model may be too simple, but the analysis presented in the link below yields encouraging results for the US. I would welcome more knowledgeable assessment.

http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/3825571/posts

No. I think the Senate should vote for/against impeachment as soon as possible.

Title says it all.