2
heightnoise 2 points ago +2 / -0

Damn, I watched that literally 30 seconds ago then started typing this. Thats fast

7
heightnoise 7 points ago +7 / -0

There are 3 truths you must not forget frens:

  1. You are aware of your surroundings. You know how evil the world is, true, but you also know how great it will be when that evil is inevitably defeated.

  2. You continue to live, and are able to walk freely, right now. And before the blackpills cry out "but Masks! Censorship! My rights are being stolen!" I'll concede this is true and disturbing. But it is not yet the end, it is important to remember: as bad as it is, the neo-Gestapo are NOT shooting your children yet.

  3. You are not alone. You have never been, and never will be, alone. That is the most powerful weapon of all: Knowledge of the truth. It is why the CCP fears it, NK fears it, our MSM fears it, the globalists in Davos fear it. YOU have that power, and so long as you preserve your knowledge, they have no hope of true victory over the People.

God Bless. Întotdeauna există speranță.

1
heightnoise 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unlikely. The ADA would require that a comment period be open and notice given, there would be so many comments that the Federal Registrar might figuratively catch fire. And if EPA forces it through anyway, it's likely to fall to the "arbitrary and capricious" test. You'd essentially have the EPA LITERALLY killing an entire industry overnight, every union of auto workers and manufacturers that would be interested parties would break down the courthouse door faster than you could say "but agency discretion?"

18
heightnoise 18 points ago +18 / -0

And his cellphone is prob just one big button that says SOROS lol

0
heightnoise 0 points ago +0 / -0

I respectfully disagree with your first point, though only partially. For example, I see no issue with an Egyptian immigrating to, let's say Finland, so long as that Egyptian immigrant 1) absolutely and permanently adopts the cultural and social norms and expectations of the Finnish, and 2) is not used by the private sector for the nefarious purpose of solely displacing the Finnish workforce to accomplish cheap labor. Nor should a Fin immigrate to Egypt unless they meet the same standard. I do not believe race, religion or creed should play any part in immigration policy, but I also believe no immigration should occur at all if these strict conditions are not satisfied.

Rather than use the identity politics of nationhood to create a label, though it is a reasonable line of thinking, I (and I'd go so far as to say most TRUE American Libertarians do as well) believe is immigration by individual merit with those strong conditions inseparably attached. You an astrophysicist that has sworn absolutely loyalty to the United States, become naturalized, and would completely adopt our cultural and societal norms and expectations? If you do that and teach your children that, then I don't care if you're a Muslim from Morocco. Personally, I find that system safer and more equitable (and not as prone to become a mutated "form" of eugenics, which is a reasonable fear should a slippery slope be followed) but that's just my two cents if anything.

As to your second point, you are absolutely right that birth rate is attached directly to the average economic value of a demographic, be it the geographic area of a town or an amorphous amount of an ethnic community in a particular country. And you are right in that economic incentives would aid in that. But, I would temper your argument in two respects. First, that economic incentive can be just as evil as good, take for example the incentive to have more babies irresponsibly to collect checks under welfare. Second, the dip in birth rate is also attached to other factors, such as lower fertility due to artificial products in our food as well as a gravitation from traditional religions and a general increase in contraception use.

Thank you for your points, and I look forward to your response to my own.

2
heightnoise 2 points ago +2 / -0

Immigration causes the problems you talk about only in cases where 1) the immigrants are not properly assimilated into their new country's values and society, and 2) there are not enough jobs for the native workforce as is. Which, unfortunately, is exactly the case atm, so I imagine that is why you have your opinion phrased this way. Am I on or off mark?

Btw Libertarian here, and this tweet does NOT represent us, our belief in maximum freedom is only practical (and not pseudo-anarchist) on a nation-by-nation basis. You can not have open borders in a libertarian society and expect the system to not tumble like a house of cards.

0
heightnoise 0 points ago +0 / -0

She's an art major, got a PhD in philosophy, and her mentor was one of the gender studies professors at USF. Plain and simple, that's not the education level I expect of a well-equipped politician. She got an endorsement from GEOTUS on account of her husband. Also, and I admit it's speculation but if it quacks it's a duck, she may have been bolstered by our local politics because she is more vulnerable to be used by either party, given her inexperience and children at home. I expect her to vote with Democrats on several issues when it suits her.

4
heightnoise 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm living here now. She's an incompetent in terms of this job, with young children at home and no experience. She got the sympathy vote, and intends to just collect her benefits and only show up to votes as needed. Many of us here are disappointed that Chad Conerly was written off, he went to our local GOP council meeting for his allocated 15 minutes to speak, they broke for lunch and gave him ~2 minutes before telling him he was unwelcome. Rep. Letlow's widow will do nothing, and the others here duped into voting for her not on merit but out of respect for her husband are quickly realizing the mistake.

3
heightnoise 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why is this stickied, when we STILL have no answers regarding election fraud and the SLEW of other instances of fuckery and corruption?!

-2
heightnoise -2 points ago +1 / -3

"Trashing the military" would be tactical error.

In doing so, in a blanket action and out of blind emotion and righteous anger, you'd also lump in those members of our armed forces that keep to their conservative convictions on private but currently are forced to be taking part in these orders. THEY will be the ones to most likely rebel when the military is ordered to fire on our citizens, and THEY are the most armed and equipped. Its one thing to not bring a knife to a gunfight, its another to not insult and make an enemy out of the neutral guy with the tank because he looks like someone else you hate. Abandon those few now, as a lost cause because of the trecherous buffoonery you see here, and they will despair and succumb to brainwashing before truly and completely falling into compliance. And then they will kill you. Because you abandoned them when they needed you, and they will easily be convinced to turn their wrath against whoever their CO conditions them to.

Rather, as a citizen, mock the military's current state and show theyve lost your respect. Make them feel ridiculed for condoning this kind of delinquent behavior. Get them angry that they have to tolerate communists and leftists within their ranks that make the uniform they all wear a laughing stock. The key is to blame the Military complex itself, not the individual Soldier without cause as to the individual.

Read up on previous coups, leadups to how military juntas have been formed, and what process citizens undertook to get on some (not all) of the military's good side at least long enough to get out as refugees. It would be wise to remember that the Military is not a single thing; rather, it is still made up of individuals. And SOME of those individuals, we'll armed and capable, are still our friends and family. And imo we stand to lose everything and more if we turn on those men currently silent, out of anger at this whole situation.

Think carefully, since we have only one life apiece, and in a scenario like one we face, an inflated ego or selfish pride means certain death. Think strategy as well.

4
heightnoise 4 points ago +4 / -0

The single greatest image in support of the Second Amendment I've ever seen. Why do we need military-style guns, because the military will eventually try to kill us for our differing beliefs, for who we worship, and what we look like. This stain is a disgrace to the uniform.

2
heightnoise 2 points ago +2 / -0

Knoxville is my hometown. It was a great place to raise kids in my day, up until I left in 2013, but like many people have said here it has changed. Business has been growing, and the infrastructure of the city is decent, but unfortunately it does have a significantly liberal element to it. If you want to have good education in the city, you would best be served with one of the parochial schools in the area, or perhaps one of the local private schools that doesn't have a bad reputation as a liberal hotbed, of which there are few indeed. The natural beauty is wonderful, the people in the surrounding area are generally good people, then it treated me well when I was being raised there for what it's worth

3
heightnoise 3 points ago +3 / -0

Attorneys in our country are known in their respective communities, and to local judges, by name and reputation. Work you do as an attorney is documented and made public. Unfortunately, leftists are everywhere, and some are very well hidden in even the most conservative perceived communities. Taking these cases, in the eyes of many attorneys, would result in social and professional sabotage. Knowing that judges might treat you unfairly in proceedings AND get away with it because what proof do you have etc, is a terrible obstacle when you know it's not you alone that would be unfairly be harmed, it'd be your innocent clients who suddenly find the world stacked against them because their attorney decided to contribute to the good fight on their own time a year or whatever prior. Attorneys are advocates, doing anything that might bring harm to your client is understandably anathema. The problem is, and you touch on this, there is a certain point that it becomes paranoia and irrational fear. We have reached that point, it seems, so now the question is how to gain courage and speak without unfairly harming future clients in the process.

1
heightnoise 1 point ago +1 / -0

Stumbling upon this while I was in the middle of eating my sandwich was....unfortunate timing.

3
heightnoise 3 points ago +3 / -0

G Fren, I speak on behalf of many: Your life is precious, and worth preserving. Many people not only love to, but rely on you. God bless and stay strong.

3
heightnoise 3 points ago +3 / -0

No. We support complete freedom, but freedom within our own borders and under our own laws. Genuine Libertarians know that a \n open borders policy will inevitably lead to corruption and the erosion of personal liberties to keep the elite in control. Granted, we are quite pro-immigration for the most part, BUT only based on merit. You want to be free, in THIS country? Wait in line, earn your place, assimilate into culture etc. like any decent legal immigrant.

1
heightnoise 1 point ago +1 / -0

Okay okay. I don't delete, I admit fault when proven wrong, and I was wrong, in the sense that it is indeed real. However, I looked through the ChemID link you sent and can't find any info on it being able to create a "longer lasting and elevated high than LSD". All I see is it is an organic pigment oxidized from epinephrine that was once considered related to schizophrenia but that such research did not pass muster. What am I missing here?

-10
heightnoise -10 points ago +3 / -13

It is larping, but for a good cause. Adrenochrome is a fictional thing but it speaks to how these sick fucks manipulate and objectify children. Adrenochrome is mentioned in Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas by Hunter S. Thompson if you want context.

Spez: I have been educated by the posters responding to me that I am indeed wrong. Adrenochrome is real, it's just that its portrayal in FALILV is apparently overexaggerated and fictional. Will be leaving this up for testament, see below for clarification.

5
heightnoise 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is where the true harm lies y'all. Keep in mind. You are afraid to speak clearly sir. And rightfully so, these people are dangerous. Your 1A rights have been successfully violated by mob rule, and I am still at a loss of an ethical way to help you.

view more: Next ›