3
hillaryisgoingdown 3 points ago +3 / -0

THIS is why we need an audit. It may be another "glitch" but that's why we need an audit.

20
hillaryisgoingdown 20 points ago +20 / -0

The guy stated his name and said that he DID NOT recant and asked WaPo to recant their story.

16
hillaryisgoingdown 16 points ago +16 / -0

looks like it

7
hillaryisgoingdown 7 points ago +8 / -1

Oh shit... it's Sandman all over again.

2
hillaryisgoingdown 2 points ago +2 / -0

Came here to say this . I don't want to be a turd in the punch bowl but if recanted it sux...assuming this is not all just fakenews. JO is implying that he in-fact did not recant...we will see.

2
hillaryisgoingdown 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes - No information. The only way to help would to be to ask people that are registered to vote that did not vote, check to see if a vote was registered anyway. If so then this would be fraud.

3
hillaryisgoingdown 3 points ago +3 / -0

Here is my understanding. Pls fact check: This is the raw data that was transmitted to the news agencies on/after election night. The stuff they used to broadcast the election results in real-time. It is also the data they are currently using the call all of the races. This pede has run through all of the data and has found sequential vote percentages /vote totals that don't follow from update to update. For example you should not see votes magically switch from one candidate to the other in successive updates but that is what happened. This explains those videos where (n) number of votes were taken away from Trump and assigned to Biden. Do I have this right?

2
hillaryisgoingdown 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah saw that... lol (such cucks)

2
hillaryisgoingdown 2 points ago +3 / -1

Nice try...You're in my wheelhouse now.. There are so many people in jail for this right now it would make your head spin. I bet anything the folks that broke the law will flip to reduce their substantial penalty and jail sentence.

by AmigoT
3
hillaryisgoingdown 3 points ago +3 / -0

Insane.. MSM responsible

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›