Why is that significant?
Yeah, been a long time for me...was always FM back then, lol.
About 1 hour & 8 minutes in.
The Bible teaches prayer. God instructs us to pray.
And when there is no Insurrection Act? What will you say then? I'm sure Q will simply move the goalposts, eh?
It's a key without a lock.
I dunno, still doubting that one. Saw Robert Barnes (who is doing some legal work for Trump) on his livestream today, and he stated that the Insurrection Act has not been signed now, or ever. Continued to say that if it were signed, they would have Trump arrested within minutes, and they are trying to trick him into signing it.
Hey, don't overthink it!
You are correct of course. My assumption is that since they are trying to manufacture some sort of inauguration day conflict, they're keeping these soldiers there until that is over. This gives them time to familiarize themselves with the area and perform some training drills.
This happened last night too. So I guess the question is how do we know there is military traffic that's shut off transponders vs just a lack of night traffic? Guess you could have some pedes monitor AFB ATC tower comms?
He's just getting a dig in to Biden, that's all. He's referencing the impending Parler shenanigans.
Shh. You sure as hell can't say ammo AND trigger in the same sentence.
Go ahead and check. You appear to have some spare time.
Sure, but he wasn't alone there. I don't think it was any inside information. Lots of people predicted it, even on this site. Robert Barnes (who is one of Lin's biggest critics) also said the same thing. Barnes said it just wasn't in Pence's nature to do it.
It's definitely not the message Bongino went with just a few hours ago. He said "I assure you, we aren't going anywhere".
The old "people think he's crazy so he must be right" strategy. Let us know how it works out for you.
Your President who did not hire Lin Wood...just saying. Trump knows.
Insurrection act is not happening now or ever.
there's no need to have a crazy man spewing nonsense
Really? When it's the same guy representing the election fraud case? You don't think that mattered?
By the way...here's just one example of a tweet from Lin Wood that was just mindblowing in how dumb and irresponsible it was.
“Wow. All of the focus on clear election fraud sure has distracted country from Jeffrey Epstein case. Man oh man. Epstein case could bring down Biden, Gates, Roberts, Clinton & others. Maybe even Obama. Sure wish Epstein was alive. Wishful thinking, I guess.”
I don't care if Epstein is actually alive, and everything in this tweet is true. It's absurd to state "all of the focus on clear election fraud sure has distracted country from Jeffrey Epstein case", regardless of the accuracy of that statement when YOU'RE THE FUCKING ONE WHO SHOULD BE KEEPING EVERYBODY FOCUSED ON CLEAR ELECTION FRAUD. Why would Lin Wood attempt to shift everybody's focus away from election fraud and back to Epstein?
We'll disagree on that being the only solution. When I see Lin Wood bullshit, I will continue to call it out as bullshit. Free speech and exchange of ideas IS a solution. People can read and make their own decisions.
But really, not defending Mr. Wood, and yeah I agree that he seems to mostly spout nonsense, but at the same time I don't think he hurt the chances of all the Fraud cases, the courts rejected the cases without even looking at the evidence.
You're misunderstanding me here. I am not claiming that it hurt his actual court case. I'm saying it hurt the perception of the election fraud claims in the court of public opinion. People are too dumb to distinguish between Lin Wood's election fraud claims and the ones actually filed by Trump's official lawyers. They see Lin Wood and Sidney Powell as the face of election fraud allegations (because the media happily makes them the face of it) and then they see the other ridiculous claims they're making, and then conclude one must be as ridiculous as the other'.
And before you claim public opinion doesn't matter, ask yourself this. If the narrative were different, and people were by & large supportive of these claims, would the courts have gotten away with dismissing cases on a technicality? Nearly half the country already believes the election was rigged, but what would have happened if that number were closer to 70%, for example? How much would perception have changed had it not been for Lin Wood & Sidney Powell's provably false claims about other issues? Or Lin Wood's threatening of officials?
We'll disagree on that being the only solution. When I see Lin Wood bullshit, I will continue to call it out as bullshit. Free speech and exchange of ideas IS a solution. People can read and make their own decisions.
But really, not defending Mr. Wood, and yeah I agree that he seems to mostly spout nonsense, but at the same time I don't think he hurt the chances of all the Fraud cases, the courts rejected the cases without even looking at the evidence.
You're misunderstanding me here. I am not claiming that it hurt his actual court case. I'm saying it hurt the perception of the election fraud claims in the court of public opinion. People are too dumb to distinguish between Lin Wood's election fraud claims and the ones actually filed by Trump's official lawyers. They see Lin Wood and Sidney Powell as the face of election fraud allegations (because the media happily makes them the face of it) and then they see the other ridiculous claims they're making, and then conclude one must be as ridiculous as the other'.
And before you claim public opinion doesn't matter, ask yourself this. If the narrative were different, and people were by & large supportive of these claims, would the courts have gotten away with dismissing cases on a technicality? Nearly half the country already believes the election was rigged, but what would have happened if that number were closer to 70%, for example? How much would perception have changed had it not been for Lin Wood & Sidney Powell's provably false claims about other issues? Or Lin Wood's threatening of officials?
So who is Patrick Ryan (the name the poem is attributed to)?
The founder of cultstate and friend of Isaac. If I were to hazard a guess, this dude likely contacted Lin Wood with the "code".
Was there anything else that might have tied to the poem to Kappy?
The title "I Ask Papacy" is Isaac Kappy anagram.
Well, we can't prove it's not true...so it must therefore be true. Only the fucking commie shills will disagree!
Yeah this is horseshit. You think Bongino, who has been the most important voice in Spygate is running a honeypot to entrap all the conservatives? Where do you come up with this?