I did some research on this.
The Business Insider article about "red flags" contains only factual materials, but it's written in a way that implies stuff that is opposite of the facts, and then makes you click on the links to see the actual facts.
For example, it talks about how the shop owner forgot to scrub the metadata of the pictures, but the meta data shows where they were taken. This implies that photos of Biden smoking crack were photoshopped at the site of the shop.
You don't see the facts regarding the metadata until you click through to their source, which is, you guessed it, a Twitter post. And, when you look at that twitter post, you realize that the "photos" are of the Subpoena to appear before a grand jury
So, since the subpoena was sent to the shop, of course the photo is likely to be taken at the shop. This actually gives credibility to the story, and it is not in any way a red flag.
The only other place it talks about metadata is regarding the .pdf documents that Giuliani sent. They show that he compiled this info almost a year ago, and then didn't release it until now.
Once again, this matches 100% with what Giuliani has been saying on his video podcast. He said he has had the documents, and is waiting for the FBI to act on them (since they have them also). It's only because of the corrupt FBI refusing to act that he's decided to release them.
Libs of course, read the headline only, or the headline and then see the word "metadata" and let their own minds fill in the rest of the details. When you talk to them, they believe that the metadata disproves the story.
My wife told me this morning that the emails were disproved by metadata. She's beyond hope. Sadly, she's just one of millions. She refuses to discuss politics with me because I challenge her on stuff like this and use facts. I don't really know what to do.
MM is saying it didn't happen.
Business Insider published an article about the red flags regarding this story, and one of the big ones is that the .pdf files made by Giuliani are from almost a year ago, yet he didn't release it to the press until this week.
They are pretending that it's somehow wrong that he waited. Keep in mind the FBI was notified first, and they said they would take care of it. If Giuliani had released it any earlier, it would have been undermining the FBI.
Watching the mass media try to twist this news into something else is possibly the most entertainment I've had since the Russia Probe dud.
Revered crack-pipe scholar, hero of the people of Ukraine and China, destroyed by the dangerous rhetoric of our commander-in-chief.
Yep, I rarely talk to my lib wife about politics but I mentioned to her this morning that it was despicable that Facebook was blocking links to the NY Post, and she replied:
"Well, yeah, but I use Twitter, and they aren't blocking it."
30 minutes later, I sent her this image. I haven't heard back. Pray for me.
But you are right. Those who hate Trump are just going to continue to believe that FB and Twitter haven't done anything wrong. I can't imagine the cognitive dissonance these people have.
True, but that was months after any big news about Epstein. People had forgotten him. Also, since there exist pictures showing Epstein and Trump together, there are liberal nutcases who actually believe it was Trump that silenced Epstein. It certainly isn't the "100% certainty it was Hillary" coverage that you and I think it should have been.
There's only about 3 weeks left before the election. If this guy was suddenly killed, it would be pretty much 100% certainty that it was the Biden campaign. Really, it would be 95% certainty that it was the campaign and 5% that it was a nutcase liberal trying to stand up for Joe, and the media would hold onto that 5% like it was everything. Still, I think this would sink Joe. No one out there has accused him of being a murderer, and this would shock the undecideds.
Unfortunately that proves nothing. You can make a screenshot showing Twitter as blocking any site you want by using that process. For example:
https://twitter.com/safety/unsafe_link_warning?unsafe_link=https://www.cnn.com
EDIT: I did more research.
Even though it would be easy for the OP to make a fake image (using this process), it is certainly not fake. Twitter is blocking that particular URL by putting up a warning page.
The reason is almost certainly this tweet from 18 hours ago. The House Judiciary was upset that Twitter was blocking nypost, so they decided to host the article on the house judiciary page, just to get around Twitter. Twitter must have responded by then blocking that page also.
It seems that at this point (9:58 am EDT), you can still click through the Twitter warning to get to the version on the house.gov site. Twitter has not (yet) silenced the tweet from @judiciarygop
If you want to read the article without giving ad revenue, here's an archive link.
The text of the article is here:
Northam will go out in public without a negative coronavirus test. Here’s why experts say it’s OK.
Despite not having test confirmation to prove he no longer has the coronavirus, Gov. Ralph Northam is expected to hold a press conference in person Tuesday.
Administration officials said Northam has not taken any follow-up tests since his illness. That’s because they are adhering to new recommendations from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that don’t rely on negative test results to determine when someone may come out of isolation for COVID-19.
“We’re really steering everyone away from testing for clearance based on the evolving CDC guidance,” said Dr. Danny Avula, director of the Richmond and Henrico Health Districts.
Avula’s department gave Northam the green light to come out of isolation. The agency led the contact-tracing efforts surrounding his and his wife Pamela Northam’s cases, which were announced on Sept. 25.
Questions over when a person is no longer considered contagious have recently dominated the news because of President Donald Trump’s experience with COVID-19 and his decision to step out again. Public health experts now say that some level of positivity can remain for a long period of time after an infection, even after a person is no longer a threat of spreading the virus to others.
Research shows that a person’s contagious period could range from one to two days before the onset of symptoms to seven or eight days after. For mild cases of the coronavirus, the CDC is recommending that patients isolate for 10 days after their symptoms started.
The Virginia Department of Health recommends that a person with COVID-19 be released from isolation using a “time-based” or “symptom-based” strategy.
For a person who never experiences symptoms, the time-based strategy is encouraged, Avula said. In this strategy, if a person tests positive for COVID-19, never had any symptoms, and is directed to care for himself at home, the person can be released from isolation 10 days after the first positive test.
Initially, the governor did not have symptoms but developed them later. The symptom-based strategy lets patients leave isolation 10 days after the symptoms started and after having at least a day with no fever and no fever-reducing medicine. If other symptoms, such as loss of taste, have resolved, they’re free to go.
Avula said the need to pursue negative testing has become a big issue, especially for people who need to go back to work.
“It has been a challenge to get employers to back off asking for a negative test before bringing employees back,” he said.
Alena Yarmosky, a spokeswoman for Northam, said the governor, who is a pediatric neurologist, has followed all public health protocols. None of his or the first lady’s 65 close contacts have tested positive, she said.
The administration is also taking precautions to prevent transmission of the virus at public events.
During the press conference Tuesday, news outlets are being asked to use a live-stream video feed from a shared camera to help maintain social-distancing recommendations. Masks are required at the event, she said.
Reporters are allowed to attend in person, though a call-in option is also available to ask questions remotely.
Elisha Sauers, [email protected], 757-222-3864
Summary: If the person never showed symptoms, then they are unlikely to spread it, even if they are testing positive. Northam did show symptoms, but we expect you stopped reading by now and assume that he never had symptoms.
Holy S***
Biden to Poroshenko:
"But going forward, it's really... I encourage you to keep the rhetoric balanced and consider how your actions are going to be perceived internationally. I mean, you have me, you have the bulk of my team, and .... But I tell you, it's, uh.. I am really worried about this."
source is from your video. Here's a direct link.
Has anyone else found anything more substantial in the recordings?
OOTL - what is the story on the 5 year-old boy?
Holy crap, it did!
I just did a search for "streamable Jacob blake", and this was the top result, even with Google!
I did it again in a private browsing session to make sure it wasn't just because of Google profiling, and got the same result.
Whoa, can I get a copy of this image without the white "How do you do fellow kids" text?
It's a really great photoshop and it needs more coverage. It would be fun to start posting this in the lib subreddits.
If you continued reading mainstream media, he was still a conservative white guy long after that was discovered. MM just didn't care about facts.
She's half Indian, and half Jamaican.
The Jamaican part is half Irish, and half "other" including unknown amounts of black.
People who are 1/4 black have been called black for a long time, so we shouldn't really be surprised by that. But there is no part of her that is "African". Her Jamaican family actually owned slaves in the past, and shew grew up living off that sweet plantation wealth.
Nice chart! Higher res version here: https://i.imgur.com/fBLaej8.jpg
The source is twitter.
Same story in Minneapolis and Seattle:
The Dems took control of Minneapolis government.
Those same dems let the police unions do whatever they want, because they send financing for democrats.
Bob Kroll was one of the best at repeating the multicultural crap. He made it up the ranks and eventually became the head of the Police Union.
Now, NPR is writing articles that literally label Kroll is a racist, and demand that he step down. They are literally eating their own.
Seattle is doing the same thing.
It's so clear to those of us on the outside. Why can't those on the inside see it?
Everyone assumes you are trolling here, but you are actually right on this point. Bubba isn't really at fault. He was told there was a noose, and he believed it, and did interviews based on what he was told.
Auto Week (the magazine brand) is mostly to blame for this hoax. Early on, people on Twitter were saying it was a garage door pull down, and Matt Weaver (from Auto Week) made the false claim that
NASCAR has confirmed it is wasn't a garage door pull down rope.
Personally, I feel that the "Smollett" name calling should be reserved for those that actually push hoaxes.
My manager is like the only person in an office of ten that's not like a huge vocal supporter of President Trump.
Simple things like this are enough to make me cry.
I'm living in a blue state. Everyone I work with has TDS. I'm involved in a few music groups, and everyone in those groups seems to have TDS.
I finally found a decently conservative church. No one there ever discusses politics, so I'm assuming that at least a couple support Trump, but even there, I think we are in the minority.
I haven't discussed politics with anyone in person for a full year now. I've never been in a situation where I wouldn't be outnumbered 30-1.
I'm just glad that somewhere out there are people who support him. My state is lost.
Either way, the article is written to make it sound like he used a drug or an additive that contains the same ingredients as found in a product for cleaning aquariums.
But that's not what happened. He just ate product that is for cleaning aquariums.
The article is lying.
Hey, I thank you for clearing this up, but I don't appreciate the attitude.
I've been wondering since yesterday how real this is. I kind of expected that eventually someone would chime into the 20 discussions I've seen about it with the full details, I just would have thought it would have been a little bit earlier than this.
You may think it's obvious, but since I have no intention of ever committing voter fraud, I can't just go around that website clicking things and seeing what happens. The only images I saw are saying that the vote will be canceled without showing any place to enter an ID#.
I'm planning on sharing your post in a couple other places where people are discussing this. I hope you don't mind. I'd prefer it to not look like we are all shouting at each other, but whatever.