As if Biden would be deemed fit to stand trial.
But 10 000 votes is not enough to sway the election!
Iceberg above the waterline was not enough to sway the course of Titanic.
Did this actually happen? hahaha
McNenenenany for president
more context: he's making the cuckiest face possible in this pic
got most of it.
journos missed civic classes in junior high. they mix up if contesting election's is indicitive of democracy or dictatorship.
but to be fair you can't keep up when it comes to being wrong with these people.
they're not sending their best
It's not about proving fraud, it's about proving the election. How does one know an election was held if the evidence of said election is not supplied? where are the fucking audits
Cooming
So basically he's saying that it wasn't Dominion that cheated. They merely provided the possibility to do so. It was the election workers that cheated.
Pretty sneaky, Dominion! 😉
fuuuuuuuuck 😱
One thing is to ignore it.
Another thing is to tout Russian disinformation rumors and not call out Schiff who were blatantly lying trying to muddle the waters.
And now Fox News* is to blame for reporting on it - "what's their agenda?"
*don't watch Fox News
So you're saying scary?
"Only evidence for 15 000 votes, Biden's margin of win was 100 000s"
Iceberg spotted above the waterline not enough to sink the Titanic.
Correct!
"How does one know the election was held if the evidence of the election is not supplied?"
And now the evidence was supplied, only it was deleted for this election cycle. But I'm sure that it's just a coincidence. /s
So 10% to the big guy was in reference to Big Mike?
Assange was #metoo'd before it was even a thing
Why would anyone want to delete evidence of a fair election?
exlain like I voted for cornpop?
Machines are [redacted]
Cmon man!
"Please Mr Lawyer, Sir. May I please, please pretty please release the evidence?"
Why is it the judge asking the lawyer rather than the lawyer asking the judge?
Treat votes the same way as evidence in a murder trial. Evidence lost in retrial? Inadmissible. "Fingerprints matched although records were removed for another trial. Trust me your honor!"
Anonymous voting is non negotiable.
This is why laws exist. To remove personal interpretation on sensitive matters. High standards of evidence remove doubt.
The fact that Trump side doubts the result is due to the low standard of evidence in certain types of voting. Removing doubt is why election laws are enacted. If laws can't remove reasonable doubt that is the fault of legislators not doubting voters.
[Every vote counts.] 😉(https://twitter.com/stone_toss/status/1324372498406920194?s=20)
Cowboy hat wearing guy with lip fuzz
Journalist of the year
What a time we live in