Machines are [redacted]
Cmon man!
"Please Mr Lawyer, Sir. May I please, please pretty please release the evidence?"
Why is it the judge asking the lawyer rather than the lawyer asking the judge?
Treat votes the same way as evidence in a murder trial. Evidence lost in retrial? Inadmissible. "Fingerprints matched although records were removed for another trial. Trust me your honor!"
Anonymous voting is non negotiable.
This is why laws exist. To remove personal interpretation on sensitive matters. High standards of evidence remove doubt.
The fact that Trump side doubts the result is due to the low standard of evidence in certain types of voting. Removing doubt is why election laws are enacted. If laws can't remove reasonable doubt that is the fault of legislators not doubting voters.
[Every vote counts.] 😉(https://twitter.com/stone_toss/status/1324372498406920194?s=20)
This one works excellent. Try it.
Just fact check every statement that comes in response. "Opinion, debunked, speculation". And mine salt from the massive cognitive dissonance. 😉
Integrity of evidence is more important than conviction is in murder trials. Evidence of election integrity has not been provided. How does one count votes without evidence of voting? Signature matches. Envelopes. Etc.
Leftists detest power imbalance. Election laws exist to protect integrity of ballots cast by voters. From those in power.
A defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty. An election is presumed corrupt unless certain criteria defined by law are met. Which are local to some extent, but for example voter anonymity is universal. Which is why open ballot voting in Putin's Russia would not count as legitimate.
Maybe voter fraud took place. Maybe not. The fact that Trump hasn't been disproven puts the legitimacy of the election in question. Mail in voting is at fault. Award Trump the win. But under condition huge voter reform is enacted.
Good to think aloud among frens and keep it concise around simpletons on /r/politics 😉
I would expand on it by saying that it might be widespread fraud. Or Trump might be a claimant of historical proportions. We honestly don't know for sure. Those withholding evidence probably have a better guess.
-
Pooh got the evidence in his pot of honey.
-
Pooh have however not seen anyone convicted of voter fraud in criminal court.
-
Pooh thus doesn't see any reason to open up his pot of honey for everyone to see.
The fact that Pooh would be complicit if fraud was found in his pot of honey isn't relevant to the issue at hand though. Could also be that the evidence of voter fraud doesn't fit in a pot of honey. Which is terrible for those trying to argue Trump is being a claimant.
Honeypot makers refrain from commenting at this point.
How does one know if an election was held if evidence of said election is not supplied?
It's not about proving fraud, it's about proving the election. Provide evidence of election - disprove allegations of fraud - open up for lawsuits against those provided false testimony.
It's that simple.
10% for the big guy was a reference to Hunter's hooker budget.
Or
10% for the big guy was a reference to a lost bet to some guy named Mike.
Biden family are not the biggliest smarties either way.
Who's killing them? 😉
Facts matter Big Big-Mike.
AOC is weak on factual matters. But to her credit she's excellent when it comes to labeling.
1.Point out when she is engaging in labeling or debating definitions.
-
Falsify her factual claims.
-
Present your own facts in an objective manner.
-
Fingerprints were found at the scene of the murder. Murderer convicted.
-
In the appeal, defendant's lawyer ask for fingerprints to compare.
-
Records of finger prints were digitally stored. Fingerprints were deleted as another murder trial is about to start. Not enough room on the hard drives for 2 sets of fingerprints. "Why are you trying to undermine the rule of law?"
FIVE STAR POST!!!!!!!
"oh yeah, about the size of a kfc bucket???" was actually my knee jerk reaction 😂
I lived and worked in some of the poorest countries in Asia as well as Africa. Trekked through mountains under guard of AK47 wielding militiamen and borderline got lynched at a stadium that was about the riot in a country on the brink on civil war.
None of that was close to the amount of baffling I experience reading through /r/politics.
Little bit early 90's retro. Clear cut corners and all.
Blue is a bit retro futurism. Reminiscent of a time where many envisioned a future as the one we now have.
The crowning achievement of a man who defeated the mob and was the 9/11-mayor looms ahead.
Get well soon, Rudy.
She was based af.
She overestimated what would happen in the absence of belief. Being religious is very positive to a great deal of people. Remove that and people will worship false gods, including leftism, egoism and other destructive endeavors.
🎵 🎵Baby, you've been going so crazy
Lately, nothing seems to be going right
Solo, why do you have to get so low
You're so
You've been waiting in the sun too long
But if you sing, sing, sing, sing, sing, sing
For the love you bring won't mean a thing
Unless you sing, sing, sing, sing 🎵🎵
Forensic audit - since some guy wanna smoke a doobie
tired of the 1% substance/99%
Browsing /pol/ not your thing?
I love how The Donald is like a fellow shit poster. RTing memes and sifting through Twitter and finding lil nuggets like this and be like:
- You tell em, Scott! Someone shou... Wait a minute... GET McENANY IN HERE. PRESS CONFERENCE IN 5. BIG ANNOUNCEMENT COMING.
Church of Based
exlain like I voted for cornpop?