2
iDinduNuffin 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you're talking about in Marxism, the classless theory's for a full-on communist society. Socialism has that administration and state leadership by definition, it's the transitionary stage where the worker's state starts nationalizing everything and implementing their reforms. The "transitionary" and "worker's state" part is the fairy tale, of course.

1
iDinduNuffin 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're not gonna be in the classroom though, your child is. So I'm guessing you mean if he comes home parroting some bit of Marxist garbage about immigrants or something. What do you do, then? What does raising hell entail?

And what's wrong with the very long list of specific examples we already have?

I just don't see people at large being effective teachers.

That's because people at large went to public schools. They're still infinitely more effective than teachers whose explicit purpose is to make your child compliant, dumb and mentally ill though. And even if you went the lazy route, just sitting them in front of one of those online programs, there's still far more choice and flexibility there. Even programs that actually focus on Americanism.

1
iDinduNuffin 1 point ago +1 / -0

In that case let's ask ourselves how much and for how long has the media been lying to us

1
iDinduNuffin 1 point ago +1 / -0

So we’re pretending Prescott Bush wasn’t charged with causing (((Wall Street firms))) to fund the nazis? The zionist royals didn’t support the nazis? The vatican didn’t?

Was he? Was that funding before or after Germany cut off the international banking cartel? Did the royals just want Jews out of their country and see zionism as a mutually-beneficial solution (Nazis themselves tried sending Jews to Palestine)? Didn't the Vatican denounce the Nazis?

Switzerland was cooperative and not valuable for the war effort; though there were plans for invading them. Did Hitler spare London, or just hold off initially hoping for a peace deal until England bombed Berlin? Yes, the Russians that were amassed in Poland and building military infrastructure near the border were almost certainly planning to invade. The German's march East was far from pointless, eliminating the center of Bolshevism and their largest potential threat on the continent. But it likely had as much to do with lebensraum and Eastern expansion being a prominent German ambition since the Kaiser days and especially WW1, when England was able to starve half a million Germans to death with a simple blockade. Don't you think the fact that Hitler's invasion failed, and he lost, would be the main reason it didn't harm communist interests?

From the bankers’ perspective, communism and corporate fascism like nazism is indistinct: both merge economy and government

The fact that one of those governments rejects and combats international banking while the other embraces it seems like a pretty stark distinction.

What's the difference between a government embracing it or not being merged with the economy at all, allowing bankers free reign?

1
iDinduNuffin 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Only some of the artillery barrage is landing on us, it's fine"

The blather and posture is for narrative control and moving the Overton window. Doubling down on it means they're doubling down on their real attacks, which WILL eventually follow through; Same way the majority of what you described about our current situation used to just be blather and posture

1
iDinduNuffin 1 point ago +1 / -0

I guarantee at least the orange man bad part is already being taught. Jury's probably still out on whether the dementia patient gets thrown under the bus for something.

1
iDinduNuffin 1 point ago +1 / -0

How do you plan on engaging? City councils or school boards don't require your own kids to be in the system.

The schools most definitely want your kids. That's how they make their living. Without your kids, they're powerless. Even the deadbeat teachers that wanted to milk the Coof for as much online school as possible are still against real homeschooling, they wanted parents to stop watching the classes.

1
iDinduNuffin 1 point ago +1 / -0

He was an adherent of Nietzsche too. They stopped being adherents of Marx when they realized it for a scam and laid out an ideology completely incompatible with Marxist theory. The Fascist economy was corporatist, between state, worker and business interests. That's what "All within the state, nothing without the state" means.

Whereas the center of socialism is the community. The shared root is that pretty much anyone in that period who was able to recognize the damages being caused to their nations under the existing social structure was some kind of socialist initially, because that was the only alternate theory prominent at the time. Left/Right labels mean a lot more within a specific country's politics than when looking at entire world ideologies.

1
iDinduNuffin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Collectivism != Socialism

It was Hitler that saw himself as taking over socialism and "correcting" Marxism.

Mussolini and co. were socialists but broke from it. Fascism was reactionary and not socialist or a workers movement in the slightest. It revolved around the state.

2
iDinduNuffin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Confronting them when they try to abuse your children leads to change.

Teach your children to be proud of their race.

That's what me and my friends'll be doing by homeschooling our kids.

Right now both you and the genocidal Marxists are telling us to surrender care of our children to them. To place them in a dangerous environment that we have less control over. It's not even just the overt abuse and communist indoctrination... the curriculum itself is generally harmful, the school regimen is harmful, the social environment is more-often-than-not harmful. How is forcing your kids to suffer through that gonna help you change it?

Taking back control of our families, asserting ourselves and exercising our freedom is the opposite of shrinking into oblivion.

2
iDinduNuffin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can you explain how subjecting your child to inhumane, psychologically destructive Marxist propaganda is going to help you make schools great again?

1
iDinduNuffin 1 point ago +1 / -0

13% of the population committing >50% of the murders is a problem. <40% of the population being the SOLE REASON the US has higher rates of gun violence than European countries where guns are practically non-existent is a problem. ~20-point average IQ gap persistent across all social strata is a problem. Interracial rape being committed almost exclusively by nonwhites against whites is a problem.

We're not "choosing to focus on random black NPCs" just because we're talking about something that showcases the sentiments of a threateningly large number of people who live next to us. This is something you guys need more exposure to. Both of us are already more-or-less aware of the general problem with Whites, excessive altruism, virtue signalling, etc. although being able to identify the cause and how it's being weaponized against us is another conversation entirely (yeah, Blacks don't control the media, but neither do Whites, nor are Whites the masterminds of White destruction, or the ones sowing the hatred against us, or the ones in the most critical positions of power)

However when I am here I feel like no matter what my values are at the end of the day you see all Blacks as the enemy. Are patriotic Blacks not a part of MAGA?

This is because your mindset's still crippled by stage 1 Marxism and the disease called liberalism. You haven't finished breaking out of it yet, so you can't generalize or think in terms of groups; there's either no group at all or it's every single individual in the group.

There's no good answer to your question. What are patriotic Blacks? The ones that care about their own nation, or about White America, or a diverse, multicultural America, or a homogeneous one, or something else entirely? And does "Making America Great Again" mean reverting it back to the first or second generations of Marxist control in the 1970's?

5
iDinduNuffin 5 points ago +6 / -1

This Dr. Schmidt? https://twitter.com/harald_tweets

I'm sure he nose what he's talking about.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›