section 230 is a perfect fine piece of legislature.
The problem we are having is that a few retarded judges decided to interpret the words 'objectionable' and 'in good faith' in a way that gives tech companies complete immunity regardless of what they do.
And it's rather obvious that this was not intent of section 230 because otherwise it would just say 'complete immunity'.
So, for me at least, this won't be a real test at all.
In fact I am remembering the world before all the forums rose up on the web, growing under the protection of section 230, and I am comparing that world to what we have now.
Imagine how 2020 election would go, if we did not have twitter or reddit or td.win or any politics on youtube, or any of the alt. tech sites to those I listed. Imagine 2020 election with ONLY MSM.
We would have been completely fucked. Globalists would just be able to pump in infinite money to sue any dissenting opinion off the web. There would be zero information getting out besides what MSM would claim - and you wouldn't even have any online places to discuss it.
thank you
i saw on another thread that it's an empty threat because the National Security bill passed with over 2/3 majority in both house and Senate and thus not subject to presidential veto.
is that true?
after watching this. i should start using less 'fucks' in my speech
yes. yes we are.
That's kind of what you do when you find yourself in middle of a coup. The difference between us and 'libs' is that the coup we are seeing is actually real.
you are clinging to false hopes. DOJ can move pretty fast when they want to. They haven't because they chose not to.
Giuliani wouldn't be chastising DOJ for not talking to a single witness or issuing a single subpoena in 3 weeks if that was the norm. It's not the norm - evidence does last forever, especially when culprits are busy destroying it.
like i said, i shortened that for low iq dimwits like you because you apparently can't grasp the meaning behind 2 paragraphs of text
When he spends the first paragraph to explain that DOJ isn't actually investigating shit - that's him calling Barr a liar. Which he than reiterates in second paragraph.
The 'traitor' part is understood by anyone who understands the context of this exchange and I graciously translated that for you as well.
afaik, that's actually the first 'official' piece of evidence that there was anything in Frankfurt to begin with.
Up to than, for 2 weeks everything about Frankfurt, Germany was building off based on 4chan posts and tweets
he is implying that when Trump's own lawyer puts out a public statement calling Barr a liar and traitor, we should probably take that at face value over random shills here calling for deports
https://thedonald.win/p/11Ql1j9gI7/statement-of-trump-legal-team-on/c/
Barr is traitor. Always has been.
are you guys retarded or do you not even bother checking the stickies on this site anymore?
https://thedonald.win/p/11Ql1j9gI7/statement-of-trump-legal-team-on/c/
this isn't about AP news. This is coming directly from Giuliani who unlike you, understand quite well what Barr could have said, and what he chose to say instead.
Deport yourself asshole and next time read the fucking stickies
https://thedonald.win/p/11Ql1j9gI7/statement-of-trump-legal-team-on/c/
Guiliani speaks on behalf of Trump and he is publicly calling Barr A LIAR AND A TRAITOR
That there is me translating for you, his 'carefully chosen words' in case you are to engrossed with your Barr body pillow to understand official statements
no idea why so many people are trying to defend him. They man did literally fucking nothing, at all, at any point during this, the most critical year in US history. Zilch. And he could have done a lot.
Yet this is not the first time he goes out of his way to make statements that undermine Trump at a critical point in time.
We are at a point where we literally have Trump Campaign putting out public statement addressed to Barr telling him to shut the fuck up and do his job.
https://thedonald.win/p/11Ql1j9gI7/statement-of-trump-legal-team-on/c/
what do you need to see before you understand this guy is a traitor?
my mistake, it was from one of the hearings
https://www.conservativehq.org/post/hearing-reveals-massive-electronic-vote-fraud-in-arizona
During the Arizona 2020 Election Hearing, cybersecurity expert witness Army Col. Phil
Waldron testified under oath and confirmed that Dominion Election Systems communicated with Frankfurt, Germany on Election Day.
Col. Waldron explained that Dominion voting machines were hooked up to the internet, where it was completely open to hackers. He added that they observed packet traffic from the US to a server in Frankfurt, Germany.
This is what they're hoping for will happen so they don't have to do anymore fake school shooters and terrorists attacks to get rid of the 2nd.
if you are worried about your guns being taken away, i got news for you. The people about to take over don't need an excuse.
As for Trump's job to instruct the military - the military even if enough of them are loyal, don't browse TheDonald and will be looking to MSM and the streets to gauge what's happening in the country.
he gives those orders right now, all they will see is a madman using emergency powers when there is no apparent emergency.
OP is right - MAGA needs to be out there by the thousands waving guns in the faces of the legislators because this is way past the point where legal and orderly conduct gets you anything but rolled over
'muh threats
I hope people have learned the right lessons from Gamergate.
fuck them. doesn't matter if they are getting threats at this point. traitors should be lucky if that's all they get.
okay, you have a point there about her being a bit bombastic.
did she not also present evidence of web traffic to germany?
lawyer that claimed she could prove millions of votes were switched to Biden?
to be fair, the only value of proving in legal court of law is when there are actually impartial judges to hear your out and there exists some legal authority to act on your proof.
if she is proving federal crimes and sees ALL federal law enforcement is complicit in those crimes, what is left to do?
they are not. There was a thousand ways for him to have avoided saying what he did.
starting with good old 'We are still investigating.'
How plainly does Trump need to stamp Barr with an 'ENEMY OF THE REPUBLIC' stamp, before you guys get it?
https://thedonald.win/p/11Ql1j9gI7/statement-of-trump-legal-team-on/c/
why is it so difficult for justice to be done
it's very simple. President cannot appoint anyone to these positions by himself.
He needs Senate to confirm
Senate is full of traitors. They only confirmed the very bare minimum they needed to retain some semblance of Republican party being anything other than one half of the Uniparty.
They allowed SCOTUS (and we shouldn't trust SCOTUS because of that), but they did not allow FEC, FCC or any loyalists to head FBI, DOJ and CIA.
Trump has spent 4 years fighting alone, surrounded on all sides by traitors that he is powerless to replace.
Trump does not have the power to remove them.
Republican Senate is not cooperating with him nearly as much as people think - everyone gaped at the SCOTUS appointments and thought there was some kind of real alliance there - nope. And the Senate confirms all appointments the President puts forward.
That's been the reason for Trump under-performing on his goals all along - people say, 'oh Trump appointed this one and this one, and he screwed up'
No. Those were the only choices the Senate approved. Do you think Trump wouldn't want to go into this election with a Federal Election Commission that actually has a quorum filled with loyalists? are there literally any plausible excuses for why a loyal Republican Senate would allow 3 out of 6 seats on that commission to be empty as we went into this 2020 election shitshow?
There aren't - they were on board with this steal all along and made sure there was no tools available to fight against it.
How about the Federal Communication Commission that could have 'clarified' section 230 and stopped 90% of the censorship?
People don't get how big 'the swamp' really is.
yeah... the guy who did FUCK ALL about all the bullshit we have seen in last 6 months, couldn't have possibly stabbed Trump again for the 100th time.
DOJ have never been on our side. All the shit Democrats are pulling would not be remotely possible if both FBI and DOJ had not been utterly compromised.
Barr doesn't even need to come out and speak treason out loud. The fact that 3 weeks post elections no arrests have been made, speaks loudly enough.
This 'democracy' bit seems like its not very competitive in the long term with patient and focused totalitarianism.
idk, maybe if US hangs enough traitors in 2021, they might regain their footing
In an interview with The Associated Press, Barr said U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but they’ve uncovered no evidence that would change the outcome of the election.
anyone got a link to this alleged interview.
Btw, i have next to zero doubt that Barr would say this. He has been stabbing Trump in the back through sheer lack of action for half a year now.
this isn't how you win.
You give her life with parole to start with, to make sure you don't accidentally kill off a potential witness.
You make clear on her record any suspicions that law enforcement has of conspiracy with others on her part.
So that any parole board who reviews her case understands that if she was really regretful of her action, she would reveal who her co-conspirators were. Than you keep her in prison, with a daily reminder that she could be out in a mere 3 to 5 years if she just gives up who helped her, put her up to it or gave her any advice or incentive to commit this crime.