1
icanhazaspergers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Article called McConnell one of the good guys, I'm out.

2
icanhazaspergers 2 points ago +2 / -0

Reminds me of the time the department of defense got a $1.6B grant to develop ejector seats for helicopters. They came up with a seat that synchronizes with the rotors and ejects the pilot between the blades, like the guns on WWI aircraft that used to shoot through the propellers, and spent $1.4B of it before they realized the pilot would pull a hundred and sixty-five Gs when ejecting.

(If a pilot pulls more than 9 Gs in a climb, enough blood is pulled out of the brain that most pilots just pass out. 165 Gs would essentially turn you into a water balloon.)

2
icanhazaspergers 2 points ago +2 / -0

Right. That’s why, if you read my comments, I’m so goddamned frustrated all the time. Saying “BQQM HEADSHOT” at a pithy tweet, or repeating that we have “discovered” that they broke the law, implies we have moved the ball down the field further toward a peaceful and positive resolution, which is the farthest thing from the truth.

6
icanhazaspergers 6 points ago +6 / -0

Until someone with the authority to do so mandates that ballots with broken chain of custody don’t count, this is nothing but an echo chamber talking point. I know this sounds ridiculous, but this literally needs to be re-made illegal because we keep saying this and the left keeps saying “so what” and Biden keeps being president.

2
icanhazaspergers 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, that’s my point. You don’t need secret software updates, there were people hand-feeding ballots multiple times and breaks in chain of custody.

1
icanhazaspergers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait.

So we can just accuse all white celebrities and politicians of "white savior complex"?!

We need to get the fuck ON THIS

2
icanhazaspergers 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep. And I understand that now, decades later, and it's still hard to wrap my brain around. How many have we lost along the way due to terrible translations and lack of empathy for those who didn't just believe without understanding?

6
icanhazaspergers 6 points ago +6 / -0

Depends on what you believe.

By that I mean, when I used to work on Dominion machines for my local Board of Elections (I maintained, programmed elections, tested, and was first point of contact on Election Day in my county for problems), I was trained on the use of the machines and the software by a guy at Dominion, who told me that the software was written by "a couple of interns in Bosnia or something."

Part of me tends to believe that, as under normal circumstances (and all this stuff went in due to some handicap-accessible voting law George W. Bush signed around 2004), private companies have to be the lowest bidder on government contracts in order to get the contracts, and therefore have to cut costs where they can, so not hiring a team of American software developers who each want $175,000/year with great benefits packages makes sense. The software was also awful, had no regard for user experience, even compared to Microsoft's offerings, and there was the occasional non-English word left in the interface. I remember seeing the word "escucheon" a lot. I'm still not sure what it means. I think it's French, which makes even less sense.

But, if you believe Dominion has lied about everything the whole time - and I wouldn't fault you for believing that, not in the least - then this very well may be true. And maybe Gates is so rusty from not actually having programmed anything since the BASIC they used on the Apple I in, like, 1973, perhaps it is his code and that's why it's so terrible. But I doubt it. At the very least, he farmed it out.

However, Occam's Razor is still a thing, and there are way easier ways to commit the vote fraud we saw. For instance, the Dominion machines in our county did not connect to the internet. However, we could have messed with the vote totals by photocopying a ballot filled out with the candidates we wanted to win, opening up the side of a machine, and feeding the photocopied ballot repeatedly, grabbing it before it fell into the basket that the ballots fall into. This also involves breaking several laws, breaking your security seals, falsifying paperwork, and breaking your chain of custody. But it also works when your local Board of Elections is as corrupt as the ones in question. And none of it requires a conspiracy by which malicious code is developed in secret by Bill Gates and sent over the internet in the dead of night.

Don't let people like Ruby Freeman walk free because of some unfounded rumor that Bill Gates actually sat down and wrote software for the first time since Nixon was president.

5
icanhazaspergers 5 points ago +5 / -0

My point is they didn't teach us that, or what it meant, or how to think it through.

7
icanhazaspergers 7 points ago +7 / -0

You gotta admit though, sending a kid to Catholic school and teaching him "I am who am" in one class and then teaching him proper English grammar in another is a stress on his faith.

2
icanhazaspergers 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think we just did doxx, didn’t we? His phone number is right there in OP’s screenshot. How do I get banned from places and that shit goes on

1
icanhazaspergers 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wish there were a way I could learn about non-political content creators who are based so I could support them. In fact I have a non-political content creator-type project (and I’m based) that I’d love to tell people about; but, alas, self-promotion is against the rules.

I’m not sure I’d do it from this account anyway, because when it comes to business, I would also like to take leftists’ money (I would actually rather take their money, frankly), but if they ever put this account and my brand name together they’d nope out immediately and take their money with them.

I’m open to suggestions on how to tell based pedes about a based person creating non-political digital content in a way that doesn’t drive my currently-significant center-left traffic away. I’m also a realist so I won’t hold my breath.

1
icanhazaspergers 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's not bad. I'm also looking for opportunities to either tell people I got the placebo, or I'm in the control group.

1
icanhazaspergers 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean, each community should have the right, I guess, to run their community as they see fit. But I do get kind of twitchy when someone makes an assumption about who I am as a whole person based on their inability to read and comprehend one or two comments on the internet and can then remove my access from that community.

For my personal tastes, GA has been a little more interesting than TD/Patriots (again, for me, this is not a judgement, same as how we probably don’t have the same favorite band) since January 20th. I’m fine either way; I either get to play in more rabbit holes and tough-love datefags, planefags, and numerologists, or I kick my hopium addiction. Either way I think I win.

1
icanhazaspergers 1 point ago +1 / -0

I appreciate that. Sincerely. I’m on the autism spectrum. Not an “autist” in the sense of a 4chan superhero who can make mathmatical equations float around in midair, a regular boring old nerd with a developmental disability. It stunts my communication skills, and every once in a while someone assigns malice to something I do or say where there is no malice, and we’re off to the races. That’s what happened last night. I’m forced to be ashamed of who I am.

To be fair, one of the mods at GA reached out overnight, and we are talking about unbanning me. I’m not entirely sure what the conditions are or how they can be met (for example, if the condition is “don’t be malicious,” and I wasn’t malicious in the first place, that’s not possible), so we’ll see.

1
icanhazaspergers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you. Actually one of the GA mods reached out to me overnight asking if I’d like to be unbanned. Not sure yet what the conditions are but it’s nice to know there are still some checks and balances in place. We’ll see.

1
icanhazaspergers 1 point ago +1 / -0

This account was permanently banned on GreatAwakening by a mod ironically named “SpeakEasy” for being “a doomer.” GA’s rules even say “doomers” and the like are to receive a temporary ban first.

3
icanhazaspergers 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah well I'm in the process of just deleting my account. I don't need this shit. I don't fit in anywhere anyway, it's not worth trying to form new relationships if they're just taken away from me when someone sees Charlies In The Trees everywhere they look. Irony of ironies, the name of the cunt who banned me was "SpeakEasy." Congratulations, this place is officially Reddit now. Welcome! You're free to express yourself her--NO DONT SAY THAT YOURE PERMABANNED YOU SHILL CUCK

view more: Next ›