If the state can force them to do as they want, why even have electors?
False premise. It's forcing them instead to do as the voters want, as evidenced the the popular vote result in the state—where "popular vote" is actually a thing.
At the national level, "popular vote" is a fantasy used by Democrats as an excuse for LOSING. If it were a real thing, then Trump would have campaigned in CA, TX, FL, NY, and IL only....and won it even more handily than he did in 2016. People forget he actually WON the "popular vote" by millions of ballots, since only legal, legitimate ballots count. Best estimates are about six million illegal votes, so instead of losing by three million, he won it by three million. Ouch, facts hurt, don't they, lefty losers? Yes, they do.
ONLY LEGAL VOTES COUNT.
ONLY LEGAL VOTES COUNT.
ONLY LEGAL VOTES COUNT.
Repeat it until it starts to sink in through all the drugs and and purple dye.
We use the Electoral College, in order to keep NYC, LA, Chicago, Miami, and Houston from dictating the result of every election, making everyone else's vote pointless.
Hey not fair given the dim-witted responses of average Americans to questions like "Who is the vice president" and "Can you point out Alaska on this map." I've seen enough Jesse Watters man on the street segments to know the MAJORITY would believe we have direct voting for the president by each citizen who votes. I'm saying IMO most Americans don't know what or who "electors" are, or what they do, or why, so the little explanation wasn't useless
MAGA