14
independentbystander 14 points ago +14 / -0

> this place has defintely gone down hill massively

To be fair so have I, so there's that.

2
independentbystander 2 points ago +2 / -0

LOL!!! Accurate!

All those buildings look so samey to me (and we've seen so many in the news recently) if I haven't been there, I can't tell them apart anymore.

2
independentbystander 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not part of that "we." I am enraged and 100% against this plague of pandering-to-criminals insanity.

4
independentbystander 4 points ago +4 / -0

He's not wrong. It is highly inappropriate to display the American Flag along with a flag saluting a tiny minority of sexual deviants.

NO BRAKES unfortunately applies to the Slippery Slope. The BLM flag will be next.

3
independentbystander 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is this the US capitol or a state capitol? (No surprise if it's the US capitol, obviously they would let BLM miscreants run amok looting/vandalizing with no repercussions.)

4
independentbystander 4 points ago +5 / -1

I would recommend watching the unedited videos without the snarky millennial know-it-all commentator's improvisations.

>tl;dr That video is 98.6% complete utter bullshit, with very little facts and research.

28
independentbystander 28 points ago +28 / -0

> Because being polite and pandering to the Protected Class has gone so well for us so far.

7
independentbystander 7 points ago +7 / -0

This is what the Slippery Slope looks like (hurtling toward the bottom.)

> No pun intended, obviously. I would not poke fun at such matters.

1
independentbystander 1 point ago +1 / -0

In recent years, that has been the case. They have also filmed movies/TV shows in Canada, also for the tax incentives etc. In the early days of TV (and movies of that period) the Hollywood studios had big "backlots" of outdoor sets, as well as big jumbo-jet-hangar sized buildings where they could build all manner of sets (even sets of "outdoor" locations, should they require effects that can be easier done indoors.)

The backlot of Universal Studios in Hollywood is a very elaborate facility with many different outdoor sets that can't be seen from the adjacent scenes. There is a full-sized plane crashed into a neighborhood still smoldering from the "War Of The Worlds," just around the corner from the "Psycho" house. That house overlooks the set of "Desperate Housewives," but you would never know that unless they turned the camera around. The "downtown" area is very strange, with a bizarre mish-mash of architectural styles/periods all jumbled up to represent different time periods & cities for fake "location shooting."

In those days, Hollywood went all-out to give the illusion their productions were filmed "on location," eventually giving up after the Rural Purge and rubber-stamping most of their movies/shows "in Los Angeles (some people do something.)" The Andy Griffith show was done at Desilu, nowhere near Appalachia. "Gone With The Wind" was also done at the Desilu/Culver/RKO ranch, including the "burning of Atlanta." That location served as anything from "King Kong" to "Star Trek." (Unless those areas portrayed in the movies etc got a big boost in tourism, their local economy did not receive the level of benefit that movie studios did by saving money not filming there, and profits from their buffoonish portrayals of Southern people.)

Then a few years ago I started to hear of Hollywood productions "outsourcing" locations to the Flyover States and Canada and that trend has snowballed. Hollywood previously went to great expense to avoid actually filming in the areas they portrayed, now the state has taxed/regulated them out of profitability when they would seem to be one of their most politically useful/financially valuable Cash Cows.

So the people who spent the last century profiting from the manufacture of falsehood and illusion (be that for entertainment or propaganda) got taxed out of their own state that they helped enable to become so wealthy and powerful.

LOL

2
independentbystander 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you, I was anyone <3 <3 <3

> Even as a long-time atheist/agnostic/whatever I still lived by the examples of my devoutly-religious family, because the basic rules/advice in the Bible are good common sense for a more trouble-free existence. I've read/referred to a lot of Bible and have watched a lot of sermons on TV over the years but I don't have the recall of the chapter/verse that a regular church-member or theology student does, so I very much appreciate your help! : )

1
independentbystander 1 point ago +1 / -0

^ THIS ^

> National Organization of Men Against Amazonian Masterhood

1
independentbystander 1 point ago +1 / -0

hnnnnngggg!!! <3 <3 <3

I got one of those once, that is as good as a Presidential Medal Of Freedom in my book!

3
independentbystander 3 points ago +3 / -0

I am from a Flyover State, and spent many years in LA/California/various DNC-controlled big-cities for work. LA was the worst, as far as the condescending know-it-all Leftist attitude of empowering minorities, illegal aliens, and the mentally-ill at the expense of working law-abiding citizens.

Very frequently, a triggered Leftist would screech at me for out-of-context infractions against Political Correctness (often, expecting me to already know about the latest narratives and language-policing standards.) I got curious after one of these incidents where I was accused of being a nazi from a racist state, and I looked up the population density of my Flyover State vs. California, in particular the smoldering crime-ridden shithole of LA. And I found something Very Interesting.

At the time, the percentage of black population was much higher in my Flyover State than in LA. The big-cities of my state are majority black, and expanding fast as "white flight"/"brain-drain" shuttles the well-off/smarter people to safety. The population density of blacks in LA seemed unbelievably low to me, considering the massive-and-daily-growing overall population. A screeching Leftist who demands of Flyover State people "WHY CAN'T YOU RACIST INBRED NO-ASS-HAVIN WIPIPO BE MORE TOLERANT? REEEEE" as always does not consider that they do not have to deal with violent crime-prone young black males in the density that Flyover State people do.

In LA, my experience was: a bunch of lily-white liberal/Leftist/SJW hypocrites preaching "tolerance" while living in a lily-white neighborhood, demanding that sensible people disregard the statistics and predictable outcomes of tempting fate around Protected Criminals. The black people in those neighborhoods were just as classy as they were (more so actually, because they are more honest) therefore, "all black people are proper citizens and the out-of-proportion crime rate is just a myth" (like Antifa, gay frogs, or Worst 0bama's "birth certificate.") Those people would not fare well in my Flyover State environment, with the black population exceeding their Hispanic/illegal alien proportions. (Our small-town crime rate has exploded, we even have police getting shot in drive-bys now.)

1
independentbystander 1 point ago +1 / -0

This sounds much like the situation of 5-6 years ago.

We were finally ending the Long National Nightmare of the Worst 0bama years, having seen for ourselves the terrible effect of the "progress" that the Party Of Crime brought about. Cities were burning, innocents were being physically attacked for their race or Conservative political affiliation. The Swamp was fully on board with all this disarray, and called for more of it with unlimited pandering to the violent Protected Criminal class.

I was very excited when Our President announced his campaign, because I had been following his career and seen many interviews discussing his plans for a Presidential run (and been quite consistent in his statements, compared to the Career Politicians who flip-flop to whatever is advantageous at the moment.)

President Trump was that guy: "brash and fierce, that won't back down when placed against a wall." He was the only populist candidate in recent years to draw the kind of appeal required to win a national election, appealing to Traditional Americans with Campaign Promises like The Wall, strengthening our National Sovereignty, helping our economy with more fair-trade laws, sensible policies on crime and illegal immigration. All of these things should appeal to people with common sense/situational awareness/concern for the future of Our Nation. I had lost all faith in Career Politicians, and would not have bothered to vote in 2016 if Trump had not run.

But plans did not "fall into place." The Swamp is so deep, and the rot so ingrained that both the DNC/RNC Elite fought tooth and nail against literally everything he proposed, even if abandoning common-sense policies would lead to certain disaster... because that's what they want, and it was just more "accelerationism" down the Slippery Slope toward their end-time goals. I remember Trump saying before The Election that he didn't want two terms: if he couldn't fix the problems in 4 years, then it was too broken to bother with 4 more.

This sort of Hopium requires another funny likable well-known billionaire who cares enough to give up his businesses and personal privacy, and endure harsh unjustified ridicule from MSM slandering any policy or statement that promotes "America First." Apart from another non-politician guy like James Woods, I really can't think of anyone in his league, as far as filthy-rich firebrands fearlessly deploying fierce Patriotism and quick-witted BTFO skills.

1
independentbystander 1 point ago +1 / -0

LOL

That is the only way I could be persuaded to watch TV for him (I have never seen him in motion, only stills from the news because I have never once watched an NBA game.)

2
independentbystander 2 points ago +2 / -0

That guy knows what's up. It would be wise to pay heed.

1
independentbystander 1 point ago +2 / -1

Our national quality of life would improve drastically if LA were suddenly falling into the ocean, or poofed away in a cloud of divine justice. Suddenly, the advertising/social-manipulation wing of the DNC's propaganda machine would be disrupted. For the most part, only the fake "news" channel HQs on the East Coast would be left, and would attempt to pick up the slack of promoting degeneracy until the movie industry could be rebuilt.

> Yes, many movies are done outside LA due to tax incentives- so some productions and companies would be spared. But: the movie industry still needs Hollywood as a home base to really do their job, and it would be hilarious to watch them attempting to flail their way back to social dominance in the aftermath of being appropriately Sodom & Gomorrah-ed.

2
independentbystander 2 points ago +2 / -0

I love Stonetoss, he's another great Red-Piller like Ben Garrison. Those guys are some of the best political cartoonists of our time.

2
independentbystander 2 points ago +2 / -0

This. Throw in the alcoholism and meth/opiate habits, high divorce/illegitimacy rates, disdain for Law & Order... and you get the same sort of "behavior" and resultant officer-involved-shootings we see in "da hood," for exactly the same reasons.

A white person whose parent lets a 12-15 year old kid smoke pot and drink booze in the house, and allows disrespectful "behavior" toward family and teachers, and lets them receive their "life lessons" via unsupervised TV/internet... is likely to turn out badly. Someone so neglectfully-raised is much more likely to commit crime, and resist arrest when caught- regardless of their race.

That's a bad parent thing, not a black/white issue. Black folk statistically do grow up that way more often, but young white people are catching up fast (due to the aggressive marketing/MSM support of hip-hop/"thug life" values and "behavior.")

tl;dr I have no more use nor respect for an illiterate uncultured drug-addicted blackout-drunk violence-prone white redneck than I do for a gangsta. Both are equally unreasonable and dangerous to deal with, when their over-sensitivities are triggered.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›