1
inquimouse 1 point ago +1 / -0

This Doucette is aptly named. Ugh. Didn't anyone else get a video?

3
inquimouse 3 points ago +3 / -0

He said that, the unseen enemy promptly launched a second wave of violence, he will not mention his next move.

2
inquimouse 2 points ago +2 / -0

These are professional agitators, a small core group, and stupid people getting agitated. You can't discuss things with mercenaries, idiologues, and idiots.

by magaorg
5
inquimouse 5 points ago +5 / -0

I live in a solidly Hispanic neighborhood which has been looked down on for fifty years and I feel very safe here. I'm a homie now.

23
inquimouse 23 points ago +23 / -0

For sure. Prearranged like phone tree. Too bad we don't have some kind of Federal office that investigates interstate criminal activity... They must face doom, this is part of the struggle that has gone on since 2015.

2
inquimouse 2 points ago +2 / -0

I liked an earlier part where Cruz was pontificating and Tucker got him to admit that whether Chauvin actually killed Floyd was a separate and probably more important issue than Chauvin's kneeling on his neck.

3
inquimouse 3 points ago +3 / -0

CNN has faked plenty of news, why not fake their own destruction. Like the old insurance scam of burning down the house to avoid foreclosure.

3
inquimouse 3 points ago +3 / -0

They are the useful idiots who promoted it through the people they chose to lead them and whose policies made them feel virtuous.

3
inquimouse 3 points ago +3 / -0

Some people need a big jar of red pills force fed.

17
inquimouse 17 points ago +17 / -0

It's 5:30 and 108 F in Phoenix. The protestors and cops are getting in place for a 6:00 protest. Yesterday the same, and the cops stood aside. More "activity" expected later when it is darker, about 8:00. It will still be about 101.

2
inquimouse 2 points ago +2 / -0

There need to be alternatives as evidenced by what happened to reddit. However, just leaving the problem doesn't make it go away, it lets it gain power and spread. These are the enemy, you can't turn your back on their weaponized words.

5
inquimouse 5 points ago +5 / -0

We often have referendums for laws. In that election there were two propositions, both of which were so badly worded and promoted you'd think they were trying to lose. Proposition 105, as I remember (feel free to correct me, Phoenicians), was against a consitutional amendment that mandates light rail, and to vote against the endless expansion and money pit of the light rail, you had to vote "Yes." Practically no one uses, let alone needs, the light rail but the "No" vote won and now we are stuck forever. The pension proposition rather flew under too many peoples radar because boring, and it was also a "yes" vote to reject a current policy, namely the pension planning for the city employee unions. Had it succeeded, future pension increases would be tied to city revenue, not the employee wish list, and the pensions would have had more auditing. The fire fighters did a good job defending the status quo with better signage, ads, and a "Protect our firefighters!" plea. Of course we want to protect them, it's the emotional hook, but having a future collapsed budget like CA is where this is going to end up. Now here is what struck me as very weird about it all: the firefighter ads were all "vote NO on 103 and 105". What interest does the firefighter union have in light rail expansion? You'd think they'd hate the trains just for the added difficulty at every intersection. And the whole train thing was just too much like the endless money pit bullet train in CA: it just feels like there is something wrong.

22
inquimouse 22 points ago +23 / -1

Ugh. The light rail is now billions over budget, years behind schedule, has made traffic worse all along its route, and last year when voters had a chance to pull the plug, the progressive City Council and Firefighters Union managed to shoot it down--along with another proposed amendment which would have required their pensions to be limited by reality.

2
inquimouse 2 points ago +2 / -0

Both can be true, they could be only 10% of cases and still be 66% of deaths. No matter how you put it, the important thing is the total deaths to cases. This is like the more familiar example of 13% of a population commiting 50% of crimes.

1
inquimouse 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh, I agree. Just thinking it might be awkward for many employers.

1
inquimouse 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are stopped if someone, like the employer, reports abuse. Maybe the employer is afraid the employee will learn he was snitched on.

4
inquimouse 4 points ago +5 / -1

The left has never understood the Streisand Effect. This definitely makes Q look better.

2
inquimouse 2 points ago +2 / -0
  1. Shilling for Scarborough-- why?
  2. If he doesn't know Klausutis, how does he know the true state of his heart?
view more: ‹ Prev Next ›