Interesting. A few months ago Brennan made some similar noise (when the Hunter Biden story came out?), only then he was appealing to Wray AND Haspell.
BCBS is vey generous.
Yes. I think Graham is hoping it's all taken off his hands by then.
Or at least the content of Q drops is rattling her.
If Q is not real, it's no worse than daily soap operas--why get excited over some interactive fantasy. The fact that FB and Hillary are getting excited makes me think more highly of Q as a possible signaller.
Someone who wanted others to join him in his outrage du jour and would then get snitty when they tried to be reasonable.
Our very own Ahab and Jezebel.
Yes. It also seems to be turning into something of a fashion statement judging from my few trips out. I think some guys are enjoying the bandido look and there are also painted gaiters which are startling.
Noticed. Every article about viruses, their treatment, vaccines--all Chinese. Looks like they are the ones being cited, which makes them look like a monopoly.
Here's the paper directly. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article The study is a pretty good review of literature about randomized control experiments. Many results are pooled from several studies and you have to look up the results separately. I was struck by one instance under handwashing. It reduced transmission a lot for Egyptian students, not for Americans. Do Egyptians have dirtier hands? Do Americans do a poor job? Regardless, pooling the two means averaging them which might be misleading. As to the face masks, they didn't want the hoi polloi wearing the N95, not that they are useless or not recommended (inference, the other kinds aren't so good). My general takeaway is that after all these studies, no one knows that much about transmission yet, so there isn't a dependable way to prevent it.
Time to kick him upstairs and make him ambassador to Tahiti.
I did know that because of Sundance, Burr has been protecting Werner who was involved with "a Russian ogliarch" back in the dossier days. Why would he do that? Don't know, maybe his cell phone does. 😁 It's a good day.
A clue? what happened then?
Supposedly that Zero was funding ISIS and Al Quaida. Very likely, but then the bad guys are so hard to identify he could always plead confusion or say they switched sides. I think it has to be something where excuses won't fly. Like laundering USAID money through the Ukraine to Soros groups, or conspiring with Chavez and Maduro to funnel Chinese drugs to the US, or shooting down the SEALS who killed Bin Laden.
It wasn't "what," it was who. Clapper could say he doesn't know what was in Obama's mind.
Which makes it seem very stupid, to me, to bring in these amici that want to reargue Russiagate.
As long as China is paying, there will be shills.
No, even though I am in the OMG you're dead if you catch it age group and have had enough respiratory problems. Because I've already nearly died several times, I've seen many people, animals, and plants die, and I know it is inevitable. But I'm still not dead again today.
Burr's stock transactions may not be the only thing that needs looking into.
Heck of a lot better than Remdesvir reducing hospital stay an average of four days.
McSalley better wake up, though. I have seen -1- sign that says Trump/McSalley. Meanwhile Kelley ads are often on TV and I must say he comes across as caring and calm, good voice. Last campaign McSalley is all in the I'm a vet, I'm a fighter pilot, I'm tough, mini-McCain mode and it wasn't endearing. Ducey can't save her hide this time with an appointment, Kelly is an astronaut so he tops her in the military glamour area, and right now everyone wants cheer and hope, not fighting and contention.
If it's legal why don't Republicans do it? Nothing turns off the left like beating them at their own game.
There are so many things wrong with this study and the whole approach of "controlled studies" being the gold standard that I could write a wall of words, starting with why are we wedded to "statistically significant" results from control group studies rather than figure out a way to use "substantive results," e.g. the many doctors who have improved their patients with HCL.
As I keep saying: Public health =/= Medical care. Public health officials do not practice medicine. Maybe it should be required, but they are developing and administering health programs and infrastructure. All they need are a few real medical people to advise them (Drs. Fauci, Bright, Birx, etc.).