If we are censored to the point where we are only allowed to post pre-approved social justice talking points, or the site comes down... I'm not sure if the site could even retain any value.
I mean, what's the point?
As I said in above post, white supremacy can be best encapsulated in the phrase "it's ok to be white." Literally accepting the continued existence of white people is what they considered white supremacy.
As a black man, if you are ok with your fellow white patriots being allowed to exist, that means that you, too, are also a white supremacist. I'm not even joking.
Those who wish to replace all white people with non-white people through illegal (or even legal) immigration consider any (such as republicans of any color) who would oppose that as inherently white supremacist.
Believing it's ok for white people to exist is considered White Supremacy. That's not a joke, it's a clarification so that people understand what they are talking about. In social justice, the idea of ending whiteness is a sacred thing, which does entail ending white people. To push back against that, such as suggesting it's ok to be white, or that white people should be allowed to exist, falls under the banner of what they consider White Supremacy. While they do acknowledge that thinking white people are superior also falls under that term, it's usually not what they are talking about.
Ironically, one of their sacred cows is, effectively (though they don't openly acknowledge it) is that white people are inherently superior and being non-white is a form of disability. As such, it's effectively impossible to have equality as long as white supremacy aka white superiority is allowed to exist. By destroying white people, it will be more equal as the other races (who are disabled) won't have to compete with superior white people.
If that sounds racist as all fuck, it's because it is. They just hand wave it away with all sorts of evasive nonsense.
It's a crazy and hypocritical ideology that engages in mental gymnastics. One of the big reasons we are so divided is we cannot even agree on basic things like terminology.
"I hate white people; they should all die" = not hate speech, nor racism
"I'm white, and that's ok" = hate speech, racism and inciting violence
This is literally how they are being taught to think, and we can't really be united. An ideology that declared being divided is their greatest virtue and goal can never really achieve unity, even internally with each other.
Based Rasmussen.
God bless the President! We still support him, and we won't be fooled by these shenanigans?
He is indeed, shitting you. The people dooming and hating on Q have no idea what they are talking about.
Have you ever listen to democrats talk about republicans? Know how it's mostly talking shit about some straw man version of republicans that isn't a good representation of the reality? Yeah that's what these anti-Q doomers sound like.
They just have some vague ideas about Q based on people who have anti-Q bias, much like the fake news is anti-republican.
The people who follow Q aren't some brain dead cult of sheep who are worshiping him and are going to cry in the corner if things don't work out according to "the plan." They might mourn the fall of our republic, but I think plenty here who don't know anything about Q would also do that.
At least you got a head start on the dooming, right?
While I don't have much faith in SCOTUS at this point, the case is still in process. We'll see where that goes.
How is that mutually exclusive with holding off on dooming for a week or 2? We've known literally for years that the scenario that is playing out right now could and likely would happen. And now here we are. I'm still trying to better myself, I'm still trying to improve my life.
If I was going to doom right before the end, I might as well have just doomed right from the start. I haven't given up on Trump, nor have I given up on myself.
Just relax, and do the best you can with the circumstances as they come. Dooming isn't going to help or change anything.
That's not really true. If we get through the SCOTUS case and nothing happens, it's over.
I think people misunderstand that those who observe what Q has posted are well aware of the possibility that it's just a larp.
You should understand that for most people, trusting "the plan" or not doesn't actually change their course of action. It's not like waiting a few weeks to see what happens is effectively different than giving up and dooming right now.
What value do you people really think being a doomed brings? Q says don't get in the way of the military. Ok easy enough. How about you? Are you gonna get all armed up and attack DC with all those troops? I assume no, so what difference does it make? It's not like those people who are watching and waiting are somehow dragging the movement down or anything.
If there is going to be a civil war, it's not going to be kicked off by people showing up to contest the inauguration by force; it'll most likely kick off by Texas breaking off and seceding, and other states and people joining them. That's most likely to happen after the inauguration.
It's as simple as understanding all the difference scenarios that could play out, and trying to go with the flow. At this point I think we've done the best we could at almost every stage. We redpilled a ton of people and effectively got a landslide win worth of votes even with them cheating; they had to cheat insanely to just barely drag Biden across the line.
There are still options on the table. I should note that these aren't new options, these aren't new goalposts. We're literally following a scenario that was highly likely to happen this way, and it correlates with "the plan" so it's still possible that something like what Q predicted happens.
Rest your faith in the Lord and pray with us.
What's the point in getting somebody in a primary if they won't win in the real deal?
I think you're misunderstanding that if we even have an election in 2022, republican voter turnout will be at a record low.
You really think the Dems are going to go out of their way to protect the Republican establishment candidate in the actual election? When the Republican gets a shellacking because the voters don't show, and they going to rig it in the R favor?
If they don't, the Dems win. If they do and they install the R, then it didn't matter what we did or didn't do, did it?
That's the problem with having 0% election integrity: voting literally doesn't matter.
Say that to the people who donated time or money.
What movement can you possibly have if your votes don't matter?
No offense intended, but your comment is exactly what he means. Absolutely no way I'm going to bother donating time or money for elections that are 100% compromised.
I gave a lot of money to Trump, and I'm neither rich nor have a high income. It was a gamble, and I did what I could to help. To have him effectively win by a landslide and then be cheated so blatantly... how can you seriously ask people to have any sort of faith in the rigged system?
I voted for the first time in 2020. I'm not young either. I've never had faith in our elections until Trump. I always thought/knew they were rigged and the establishment controlled both sides. Trump gave hope and enfranchised me. This blatant election fraud has completely dis-enfranchised me again.
A vote for these elections is an endorsement of an illegitimate system. It's a joke, and they are literally laughing at us for falling for it, year after year.
Didn't they outright ignore election integrity laws in 2020? I'm not saying it's a bad thing to do, but I'm not sure what exactly is the point?
Laws don't matter. If they can cheat (they did) and break the laws (they did) and get caught (they did) and haven't had any consequence (none so far) then the election integrity laws could and would only be used against us.
Is it really worth the effort and campaigning to pass laws that only restrict us, and not those who need to be restricted. Lots of energy would be spent that could be spent on pretty much anything else that would be better.
Why not both? Congress isn't serious people, and shouldn't be taken as such.
It's really just symbolic. A small step better than nothing. Considering nothing is largely what we've gotten from the republicans in Congress, it's actually something.
I, for one, am glad that he'll be facing articles of impeachment on day 1, should he actually make it in. I know it's unlikely to be anything, but I think it's something to rub in democrat faces so they realize, on some level, that impeachment is now a routine and trivial thing.
Not saying it's going to make much difference, but most democrats have a certain level of ridiculous shenanigans that's just too much and they red pill. Mostly just the high threshold ones left, but every little bit still matters.
Like Michael Flynn got a fair trial?
Naw Joe was the 10th person in the poll. He was one of the 4 to disapprove.
Drs kill people then count them as Covid.
Here is the link for anybody who wants to read without going through twitter:
addressed the nation
If the nation is 52k people, with a bunch of them being various media orgs, potentially watching multiple streams at once.
Fact is, the biggest difference between today and yesterday is the level of fraud that's been exposed.
I understand your frustration, however, it was no secret even before the election that it was going to have massive fraud, and it was going to be contested, and it was going to go to the courts and the courts would cuck out and it'd have to be fought all the way the Supreme Court, and that would take a long time.
The reality, is none of these setbacks (aside from the initial election day itself) has been a real setback. It was a mistake if you were counting on those steps, as those were always just part of the process. Stepping stones. Sure they could've gone better for us in theory, but Biden would've just contested or appealed and we'd have still followed the same trajectory as we are following now.
Have faith, say your prayers, and be ready for the worst case scenario. Just remember, no matter how frustrated you are, your frustration won't help the situation in anyway. Only your faith, devotion and preparation will make any difference here. Better to direct your energy to one all of those things.
All governments that lean far enough to left, ultimately run into that same scenario. Some people contribute more to society than they take, and others take more than they put in. Disabled, retirees etc. are in the later category.
Taking care of everybody, regardless of their contribution, initially seems to be the most compassionate way of doing things. Those who contribute more, get discouraged as they get the same as those who contribute less, or none at all. This reduces productivity to the point where there aren't enough resources to go around.
Severe rationing will eventually make even the most compassionate question how they can fix it. There is either encourage productivity (often at gunpoint, which isn't as effective as you might think) or reduce consumption. With severe rationing already in place, reductions in consumption can't be targeted at those who are net contributors, which naturally means those who are net takers need to be... dealt with.
This dynamic is what leads to millions or tens of millions dying at the hands of the far left. This is "The Socialists Dilemma" as I term it. Socialism cannot work until you resolve 3 critical problems:
The power of the government will turn tyrannical under socialist if left unchecked. As Carl Marx, the father of Marxist communism said: Any attempts to disarm the people of their arms and ammo must be frustrated by any means, including force. He recognized the same as the founders did in the 2A. The people must be armed.
Anybody who is against the 2A is not a real socialist, and should be considered a tyrant for advocating one without the other.
Second is to understand the dynamic of net takers and net contributors. This means we need absolutely zero tolerance immigration policies where all immigrants and net contributors, and young enough to contribute enough to make up for what they will take at an older age. Illegal immigration will ultimately disrupt this, and absolutely no illegal immigrant can be allowed or tolerated. Such would only have net takers join in, which would sink the socialist ship.
Anybody who is in favor of illegal immigration is not a real socialist, and should be considered dangerous for advocating for both.
Third, and this is the major deal breaker, you must have a very strong nationalistic culture that advocates for hard work and contribution to community, regardless of ones individual compensation. This can only be done through not only nationalism, but a deep and enduring culture. Even then, its increasingly challenging to maintain as the size of the nation increases.
Anybody who is against nationalist and/or a strong cultural identity, is not a real socialist and is probably a foreign provocateur if advocating socialism while opposing these things.
Our current crop of socialists:
Oppose the 2A
Are in favor of illegal immigration
Are anti-nationalist
Are opposed to a culture of hard work
They say: "Real socialism hasn't been tried!"
I say: "Insanity is doing the same things over and over, and expecting a different result."
We absolutely cannot, under any circumstances, allow these people to come into power. It's literally the worst recipe for disaster possible.
This is the correct answer!
More energy! We are committed pedes. Let us put our fates in the hands of the Lord and give it our all. Don the Armor of God and let our virtues be unshakable.
Defeat was never an option.
I know a couple of establishment republicans. Voters that is. Absolutely not communists. Tools for the communists? Sure, but mostly it's that they buy into the narrative. They have conservative viewpoints in principle, however, that's a lens they use to view the disinformation of the MSM.
It's like the old trash-in, trash-out principle: establishment republicans take misinformation (they don't accept its misinformation and think it's true) and then take a conservative stance based on that misinformation.
There is a reason we call fake news the enemy of the people. These establishment republicans are the right wing of the deepstate bubble. I'm betting most of them don't actually think they are supporting the rise of communism. Even the elected ones are just plain old swamp, getting rich off the taxpayer dime, and don't want Trump to end their gravy train, or worse, hold them accountable.
Remember all the hoops we went through on reddit? Remember how much it literally didn't matter? How they banned the dom for some unspecified violation months after people had completely stopped posting?
You cannot negotiate with these people. We can jump through their hoops and do their stupid games, but ultimately it probably won't matter.