4
isellmacs2 4 points ago +4 / -0

So he's asking for money for an org that also would share money with him? I saw one of the mods post a link to a fundraising site, but I think it wasn't winred.

Speaking of which, can anybody find that post or know what the link actually was? Can't find it anymore.

3
isellmacs2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah I've never understood how this isn't something we can just throw more people at? It's not like we don't have any idea of how many registered voters there are. Or even for last minute registrations, our census gives us an idea of our population. If 1 person counts 1,000 votes then 10 should be able to count 10,000.

This seems like a problem of arithmetic, or it would, if there was any credibility or legitimacy here. I think we all know this is a sham. After all, seems like California had no problems handling their voting, despite the huge population. California isn't a swing state, and it sure seems like only the swing states are having troubles counting. Coincidence? We all know it isn't.

11
isellmacs2 11 points ago +11 / -0

Isn't Wisconsin already at like 101% registered voter turnout? All across the country we are seeing record turn out in the high 60's, even though Biden is as low energy as it gets and his support is luke warm.

101% is just impossible shenanigans! It seems like it's not even just people who didn't vote; this has to be either vote duping or numbers are being pumped by that fractional system.

1
isellmacs2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Probably cause they think Trump has enough votes to win but aren't sure what to do about it. One problem with everybody knowing they're going to cheat using a certain strategy is them being watched very closely; if they they fuck it up it may end up back firing on them, especially since it's likely to involve court cases.

With the media, they can just ignore or gaslight. In the court system, however, evidence and discovery rules means damning evidence of fraud could heavily shift a court case. Since it's like going to the Supreme Court, anything that might come out is going to get revealed and could alter the final ruling.

3
isellmacs2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Looking at decision desk, it appears like Biden needs both NV and AZ and to not lose anything that's already called for him. If any of those flip it's Trumps win.

It's still too early to call. It shouldn't be, but since they are dragging their heels, it is.

7
isellmacs2 7 points ago +7 / -0

A lot of them are probably paid to be there. It's one thing to have TDS and want orange man out, it's another to have to sit and listen to Joe Biden babble. Some of them are probably just questioning wether the easy money for just sitting there is really worth sitting through this bullshit.

9
isellmacs2 9 points ago +9 / -0

It's funny that some people still think Trump is going to do that sorta shit. Like, we're already pretty much done with his first term and none of the doomsday predictions have come true. Even when given the perfect chance to seize power (the virus) he didn't do so.

2
isellmacs2 2 points ago +2 / -0

I read it as both. It's the future and the top panels are the fathers memory, of the time before his son dies in war, and him remembering when he had a chance to save his sons life, but he didn't take it.

He didn't really understand at the time, but in hindsight he does. And now all he has left is the haunting memory of how his reckless hatred for Trump ended up costing that which he loved dearly.

That memory of his son manifests to ask the question from his own mind. Why did I vote for my son to die? I could have voted for him to live, but I didn't. My son is dead and I rightfully blame myself, as I voted for his destruction.

4
isellmacs2 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's horrible

Amusingly enough, Hairy Mouse was actually sharing the translation above.

Alternatively completely dismal or fucking terrible would also be appropriate translations.

Kamala appears to mean a very high amount of bad.

3
isellmacs2 3 points ago +3 / -0

He's tolerable in short and infrequent segments. He tends to repeat himself and really talk way too much, however, and it gets tiresome. I know the Hannity show is about Hannity, hence the name, but damn, does he really rattle on sometimes.

I much prefer Rush, as he tends to wander through various topics but he's not always repeating the same old lines over and over. You could edit Hannity and reduce redundant speech by at least 50%.

I don't even listen to him anymore. I would if he said something as important as what Tucker covers, but so far that hasn't happened, which only reinforces how little of value he says.

Bongino covers mostly the same topics, but does it better. Bongino, too, can be a bit wordy, but still much more listenable than Hannity.

2
isellmacs2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Considering that some black guys have tan lines, or at least their torsos are lighter than their hands, neck and face, I think there is some variance depending upon their melanin count. For somebody who is lighter, it's not unreasonable to think they are more able to tan, and during the summer months would probably darken up some.

Or they are playing with filters to make it seem like he's darker.

1
isellmacs2 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's weird, because I heard her say her name as ka ma la. He even replayed it in the clip and I heard it the same the second time.

3
isellmacs2 3 points ago +3 / -0

There are other pics that I think are her, and having reviewed a lot of other pics, I think it's actually one of Natalie's friends. Natalie had 2 friends that had appeared in released pictures that seem to go back for many years, and I think they are a bit older, or least developed faster than her. One of them is a brunette that looks like the crotch shot pic (though hard to say with her face partially obscured) and the other is a black girl who looks like she could be the one in another pic.

Pol had a pretty convincing thread on this, that somebody linked in the laptop drop comments.

1
isellmacs2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is this a repost or a copypasta? I recall seeing this exact wording quite some time ago.

2
isellmacs2 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think you are overvaluing their lives, and not appreciating the amount of taxpayer monies needing to be spent here.

A compromise of single bullet and half a helicopter ride seems fair, though.

3
isellmacs2 3 points ago +3 / -0

More likely share blue or another DNC activist group.

So domestic CCP contract workers?

2
isellmacs2 2 points ago +2 / -0

I didn't save any. Before the debates, people were talking about a specific dementia medicine that I don't recall the name of. It was mostly in comment sections where people were discussing how Biden would go toe to toe with Trump, and there were suggestions that he'd be given X medicine, but others noted that there were side effects of taking it, and they'd need to give him quite a bit and that risked doing permanent damage.

You could search around for Biden dementia medicine to get a name, and look up the possible side effects. If such a drug didn't have side effects, then all dementia patients would be on it all the time, at least that's the way I figure, so it seemed plausible that it would be dangerous.

8
isellmacs2 8 points ago +8 / -0

BLM is mostly just corporate blackface.

2
isellmacs2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is it really 2.0 though, or just 1.0 working as intended?

2
isellmacs2 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's how fascism works. It's the biggest danger in fascism; once the state and private are so seemingly intertwined it's hard to tell one from another. Especially in America, it allows the government to evade the restrictions placed on it by pretending to be private companies.

2
isellmacs2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Democrat voters used to criticize the spook agencies for attempting regime change in other countries. Now they love them for using all the same tactics for attempting regime change in ours.

5
isellmacs2 5 points ago +5 / -0

She probably said yes publicly to not get the backlash and then McCained at the last minute anyway.

5
isellmacs2 5 points ago +5 / -0

The fact that you can't even view it without logging in means it'll never go anywhere. Sharing info is a huge part of social media and if it requires a login, even a free one (and sharing phone number isn't free) then people will likely ignore the links.

I sometimes see people share Facebook stuff that requires you to login to Facebook to see it, and I simply ignore it. Even though Facebook would be easy to get and sign in, it's certainly not worth the effort for something like sharing a social media post.

If twitter required a login to view posts it would've never gotten as far as it has, even with the deep state backing it.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›