A lot of the personal stuff was good. The Cuban migrant was really good. The Democrat from Georgia was also pretty good. Frankly, some of the other stuff was kinda cringy. That financial officer who was constantly waving their arms around honestly didn't seem genuine at all.
Where does it say in the constitution that providing foreign charity is a proper role of the federal government?
"The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the
United States."
NOT OTHER COUNTRIES. COMPLETELY UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
It's almost like welfare...
Money given isn't money earned, so you feel no attachment to it and easily waste it.
The best fix is to turn off CNN and MSNBC, go outside, and to see that the world isn't ending.
I can already hear the cries of "MUH DOUBLE BLINDDDDDD STUDY" in the distance.
Exactly. We can safely go to the grocery store every week, but we supposedly can't vote in a voting booth.
They don't even have to be overtly manipulated. They can be inadvertently manipulated by confirmation bias.
Researchers are supposed to put all of their effort trying to DISPROVE their assumptions. This is how the scientific method is supposed to work. Nowadays, this has been reversed in favor of: "my leftist professor told me ___ is true, so let me focus all my research on proving that it's true."
About a year ago, physicists created a picture of a black hole. These physicists understood how important confirmation bias is, so they explicitly followed a strict protocol where nobody could see the photo until all of the data was collected. They wanted to make sure that they wouldn't subtly change the methodology halfway through collecting data in favor of a certain preconceived assumption.
This is how research is supposed to be done. Sadly, almost nobody follows protocols like this.
Meanwhile, most of these people are leftist humanities majors that failed math and don't know shit about science. Because they don't understand numbers, they don't understand how easily statistics can be manipulated to yield almost any conclusion.
"Ooooh, numbers and charts that confirm my preconceived assumptions. That must mean they're right... because math! What?? You question my data? SCIENCE DENIER!"
The amount of times studies that can be debunked with the simple fact "correlation != causation" is astonishing.
First, they turn the cities into shitholes. Then, they promise their deprived residents miracle top-down government solutions which sound good but actually only make the problem worse by discouraging investment into the community.
That's how communist tyrants like this get into power.
I'm sure this communist dipshit's policies of ridiculous taxation and regulation will help bring more supply to the housing market.
She won't make any "bourgeoisie" peasants. All the "bourgeoisie" will just leave her shithole dystopia, taking all their wealth and jobs with them as the few remaining residents become fully dependent on her communist welfare state. Almost no businesses will remain, so no wealth will be produced in the community, creating a feedback loop of poverty. The only thing which will keep the community alive is the generosity of the rest of the country. Meanwhile, these communist tyrants will remain perpetually in power because the residents essentially become wards of the state.
Communism can only exist when it is funded by capitalism.
I'm sure that fake research company has already cooked up a fake study where they just have to fill in the blanks.
THEY'RE PUTTING KIDS IN CAGES! WHERE'S AOC!!
I understand the point you're making, but it's still very unlikely.
First, you didn't explain why they use such vague language. If you're an insider and want to reveal information anonymously, what's the danger in just being clear and explicit? There is no benefit in being cryptic -- just say out-right what you're saying.
Second, you act like using anonymous boards online is the only way to reveal information without revealing your identity. There are other ways too. Ex: go to media channels like Project Veritas. Using an anonymous board is the least credible way of revealing information since literally anyone could pretend to be anyone else. Right now, I could go to 4chan and claim to be Donald Trump. However, nobody with more than 2 brain cells would believe my claim. So why do you believe Q?
The media calls all Trump supporters white supremacists and domestic terrorists.
I absolutely agree that these smears are meritless. The Q people have nothing to do with white supremacy; I'd describe them as weird libertarians who are so heavily suspicious of power that they believe conspiracies.
Harris - "Right now, we have a president who turns our tragedies into political weapons."
I don't know if she meant the Democrats instead of Trump, because she just perfectly described the whole Democrat campaign over the last 9 months.
I can't wait until the Republican convention. Hope it blows all of this lying garbage out of the water.
Imagine if we did the same and said "we selected ___ as president because they're white."
I don't agree with the MSN or the DNC in any way, but I still think it's a massive conspiracy theory based on deliberately vague statements written in a way to allow almost any interpretation.
It's complete confirmation bias. Literally anything can happen and someone will find a way to link it to one of Q's vague statements and say it's a "confirmation." When you believe something which can never be disproved, you're no longer based in reality.
If a government insider really wanted to send out messages, they wouldn't use anonymous boards and super vague statements. Why wouldn't they just come out and release a clear public message? That would make the statement a lot clear and credible. Clearly, Q is run by a guy who knows how to manipulate people psychologically and use confirmation bias to make people believe anything.
What do you mean by "allow"? Do you think that Trump would find out who is acting like him and arrest them?
Q is a massive conspiracy based on deliberately vague statements written in such a way that people could make almost any conclusions from them. It's pure confirmation bias. If an insider in the administration really wanted to send out messages, they wouldn't do it through anonymous boards in extraordinarily vague statements.
Trump clearly doesn't know much about the movement and is simply listing off what his general supporters believe. Don't read any more into this. The simplest explanation is often the best.
You can just say comrade. I'm sure Bernie Sanders and AOC would prefer that.
So how many of the people here actually watched any of it?
I wouldn't be able to watch a single second of that shit show.
Nobody seems to be mentioning the fact that she didn't say that she seconds the nomination of Bernie Sanders for the Democratic candidate for president... SHE SAID "for president of the Unites States."
Is she calling for her supporters to vote for Bernie Sanders in the general election???
I can already see Adam Schiff drafting the articles as we speak.