Democrats are asking for precedent of nominating supreme court justices between July and the election. So I actually took the time to look through the history of the Supreme court. Here are my findings:

Melville Fuller (July 1888)

George Shiras Jr (July 1892)

John Hessin Clarke (July 1916)

William J Brennan Jr (October 1956)

However, the DemocRATS deliberately use the phrase "election" to mislead you. What this excludes is the fact that there were 6 justices nominated by a president AFTER they lost.

John Marshall (January 1801)

John Catron (March 1837)

Peter Vivian Daniel (March 1841)

Samuel Nelson (February 1845)

William Burnham Woods (December 1880)

Howell Edmunds Jackson (February 1893)

How many stories do we need to be put over the line? How many times do we have to see innocent people's lives ruined by media-promoted mod rule? How much tech censorship are we going to take before it's enough? How much outright lying should be acceptable?

Every time a new leftist narrative comes out, we act surprised. We act like it's unprecedented. We meme and act outraged online. Then, tomorrow, we rinse-and-repeat.

Honestly, I'm not surprised anymore. This cycle of leftist radicalization is completely predictable, so why should I be surprised? Isn't the trend completely obvious at this point?

Only a few years ago, an idea like "defund the police" would've been laughed at. Now, this anarchist idea is constantly promoted by everyday leftists, even making the front page of CNN.

Only a few years ago, censorship of a president online would've been considered unprecedented nationwide news. Now, it's not even reported on Fox News.

Only a few years ago, protecting our border would've been considered a bipartisan issue. Now, you're called a racist for doing so.

Only a few years ago, our flag and national anthem would've been considered unifying symbols. Now, they're taken off our shoes for being "divisive".

Only a few years ago, an open socialist or communist would never be considered for a local or federal political position. Now, Bernie Sanders was a top candidate for the presidency and a literal Communist is in charge of a district in Denver.

Only a few years ago, a single violent riot would be mainstream news. Now, these "peaceful" protests happen every day.

When is it enough? Instead of acting outraged on the internet, we need to do something. Trump winning won't be enough -- the radicalization won't stop. No, we must utterly and completely destroy these radical ideas. This means that we cannot be satisfied with a minor election victory -- we must aim for a complete landslide, whether in 2020, 2022, 2024, or later. If we can't win in a landslide against ideas like "defund the police", it's only a matter of time before our country completely collapses.

The only real way to achieve this is to convince our neighbors and our communities. Give up some of your more extreme positions if it means that you'll convince someone to vote against leftist radicalization. Be reasonable and act reasonable -- be the adult in the room. Ideological perfection will never win the war.

The Democrat obstructionists in the House of Representatives are at it again, starting an investigation because Pompeo dares to have a speech at the Republican national convention. However, this investigation, as always, is complete bullshit.

Subsection (a) in the Hatch Act lists restrictions on political activity from federal employees. However, if the Democrats cared to read any further, they'd see:

"An employee described in paragraph (2) of this subsection may engage in political activity otherwise prohibited by subsection (a) if the costs associated with that political activity are not paid for by money derived from the Treasury of the United States."

In this case, paragraph (2) includes:

"An employee appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, whose position is located within the United States, who determines policies to be pursued by the United States in relations with foreign powers or in the nationwide administration of Federal laws."

What this means is that Pompeo is specifically excluded from the restrictions related to political activity.

https://osc.gov/Documents/Hatch%20Act/Laws%20and%20Regulations/Statutes/5%20USC%207324.pdf