Boy, true believers believe right up until the end. Like loyal commies sent to the Gulag, it has to be a mistake, part of a plan, something.
The special counsel appointment, by law, can't be given to a federal employee. It has to be assigned to someone outside government. Barr simply said it to string us along for another month.
"YOU DOME UNDERSTAM HOW DIS WORKS IT TAKES TIIIIIIIIMMMMME!!!!!"
There are a shit ton of retards that owe an apology for giving him uncritical air cover so long. Same retards that still argue Sessions secretly helped drain the swamp.
People emotionally invest in hero worship, never let go.
This doesn't smell right.
This pede gets it. ^^^
We reject these fake Hollywood fucks right up until one ACTS like they are one of us, on our side, and the we gave like a nerd girl for the football captain. It's kind of gross.
And they always have an ulterior motive. You nailed it.
I would have said "Whenever you want something, you get on your knees, don't you?".
What a fucking cuck. That made me feel nauseous.
"... except when they are dead, fake, or evaluated by Democrats."
Seriously, they sell this bs to their own team as a group lie to make every leftie feel less stupid when they repeat it like parrots.
I did not say Rudy's comment was about public perception.
It has to be the right question as a matter of SCOTUS addressing it in a way that invalidates it all.
The public optics doesn't matter to the good judges, but certain judges will figure out how far they can stab us in the back based on public perception. Judges like Roberts and Briar. If we have a loss or two prior to Rudy getting before them, because the R party asks dumb questions likely to be ruled against them (like can states ignore their own state constitution if the legislature says so, wrt voting law), it give Briar and Robert's more likelyhood to fuck us later.
You know these fuckers gave it to him on purpose. They probably have rotating sick assassins in two week baton passing illness phases to throw at us.
Each SCOTUS judge covers certain states to recomend fast track. I know that. What I was trying to say was CJ Roberts may have a say in if it gets heard, and he has shown over and over he cares about the optics.
If you read the article, the case is not a slam dunk, and the "win" not one to toss the entire election. It brings risk in that if we lose, the optics are super bad, if we win, only a single state is forced to discard it's bs cheat mail-in (good).
I'm a doomer when it comes to R party help, yes.
Now, I read some other comments here, there seems to be some good preemptive dismissal of Safeharbor by Alito. That's a positive.
I know that. My point is the public only see's it as "a case made it to SCOTUS, failed".
Just like the other court challenges that seem to get swatted because their is no big name visibility, this one will be assigned to Trump team and described as "See, they lost at SCOTUS!!!".
This feels like a total trap by the R party to get us to blow our SCOTUS hearing wad on the WRONG questions, giving us a dangerous SCOTUS black eye in the CJ Robert's thumbs up / thumbs down agreement to hear cases based on public opinion.
Yes, the states have the right to set and break there own state constitutional rules.
Rudy said THE RIGHT CASE needs to go to SCOTUS, meaning the RIGHT QUESTION. These two questions are the WRONG questions.
The RIGHT questions would be "We have been disenfranchised of our election through fraud, and SCOTUS must rule on the evidence and the constitutionality of this election", so it gets tossed to the federal legislative vote.
Republicans pretend they are helping us when they are actually hurting us. Average people can never see it for the back stab it is, which is what makes it devious, traitorous, earns them the nickname RINO.
This is big news! Let's hope they get machines that have not been cleaned up. Rudy himself said the system cleans up it's fraud behind itself. Hopefully they have someone who can examine the code itself, not simply security people.
That's a big difference, .26% vs 26%. I'm afraid to share this because. 26% is going to be laughed at.
They were Sunday afternoon rallies at 1PM.
There really was no excuse. We just want to dial it in, unless Trump is there to speak. I love rallies for Trump, ho to them, but this is the truth.
It's also why all the shit talk about 1776 is not taken seriously by the elite political class. Learning we are all talk is actually Obama's legacy. I'm not a glowie, not challenging pissed Patriots to prove me wrong, but I am right. We need Trump to start a new party if he doesn't win, and we all need to join it.
There is certainly a good possibility a white hat hacker patriot will do this. We are at the point where it goes guerilla because they are so fucking evil, have gained so much power.
I think even if we did however, we still need a new party with power closer to the people. Power corrupts, so we don't want an endless cyber war. Even if some mystery Patriots took it back in one election with counter cyber espionage, we don't have the people in the corrupt system to stop it from coming back with the current R party in control.
We shall see. I don't see it happening that way myself. The "Stop the Steal" rallies a month ago shrunk from one to three in ecery state, down to just 4 cities due to lack of attendance. If people won't show up to rally, they certainly are not going to take up arms and fight our military. I think a new Party created by Trump will be the vehicle back if this bullshit stands.
We'll fight it at the state level up.
New party sucks out 85-90% of R party voters who all register Lion Party.
Lion Party (LP) runs state level candidates, uses a block chain based app to record their individual votes while maintaining privacy.
LP becomes masters of elections by taking state legislatures, one state and one battle at a time. Use our massive pary registration and vote records, created individually as digital affidavits, to prove the R vote is all a fraud in court.
LP eventually takes back federal legislature, probably in '24. Trump comes back with us to do it, running as POTUS again. We take it all back.
LP has built in reforms to force voter representation, such as "no confidence" votes in all party leadership and committee positions, stripping members of matching campaign funds, etc, when they get out of line (corrupt).
I figured out the game a couple days ago. The threat has to be made, and that is what Lynn did. As his secret proxy.
If they don't get on Trump's side in this fight FAST, using their true power, he will come back in '24, but with his own party. If we are going to suffer Biden, we might as well build a new party under him. One that leaves the GOP a hollow shell.
Why is Trump even pretending Kemp is legit? China Kemp is banking on a Dominion reelection.
I'm not being a doomer on him. If he's the real deal, he'll take it as good advice if he wants to take his work public and have it taken seriously, save our nation. It's a pretty simple concept, but people who hate it seem to have a problem with it. Corrupt judges don't care about scientists or engineers if they can paint them as cooky.
I hope you're right. I haven't seen his LinkedIn profile, but he sounds smart.
Yeah, a dishonest snark answer to avoid the point. Proved me right.
I'm attacking the style for it's style, not attacking the substance. The substance is basically beyond my math knowledge to say it's good or bad, which makes the style super important if you want people to just accept it is true on faith.
I didn't expect the debate to go this long tbph, but it always strikes a nerve with Q type, fake military tacticool armchair guys, and we have a small contingent of that here so... is what it is.
The person forgot the two different OIG reports that were going to expose them all. I think it was after the first one that I learned not to believe it until I see it.