5
jb42 5 points ago +5 / -0

The state is what prevents other people from making the product. There is no free market for pharmaceuticals in the United States, nothing even close.

4
jb42 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not likely to be a surprise. Obama did this intentionally to help people in marginal seats. Don't be fooled, it's a show.

3
jb42 3 points ago +3 / -0

Struggle session. If you're forced to say things you absolutely don't believe, you end up rationalizing it to yourself over time. It affects people greatly. Also, they want the quote, so they can take it out of context and show you that "even X agrees, why don't YOU now?" It's meant to snowball.

1
jb42 1 point ago +1 / -0

Out of curiosity, does taking the case require a full vote of the Supreme Court? Or did Roberts get to decide that?

1
jb42 1 point ago +1 / -0

Actually this is a great idea. Trump has 92% support among Republicans. The working class actually cares about this country. Get them in instead of silver spoon "I am a Republican because I like money types". If you can win over 10% more Democrats, you can replace Republicans wholesale.

6
jb42 6 points ago +6 / -0

Exactly so.

In 2008, all the big banks got bailouts, except one. National City. PNC got two, and was told to buy National City. Dwell on that for a while. Money is just the proxy. Coercion is the goal.

1
jb42 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you analyze the mail-in voting data you'll find within 0.01% it's partitioned. Doesn't matter what Libertarians do.

1
jb42 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fascinating. So for the final vote total, Democrat = Republican + Libertarian + about 2250 votes. Almost as if it's partitioned.

About a week after the election, I ran some numbers. Take before-election known party registration percentages, for each county, for mail-in votes only from the Pennsylvania data. Assume all registered Libertarians and Republicans voted for R or L, and all registered Democrats and all other party registrations -- 100% -- voted D. I found, when you sum it up for the entire state, that this predicted the mail-in vote except Democrats came out 2400 votes ahead.

It'd look realistic in retrospect, that the number of R+L voters and the number of R+L votes matched, for mail-in. Until you realize it means 100% of independents supposedly voted for Biden. 100%. Plus 2400.

I have this analysis in SQLite format (with accompanying CSVs and scripts) if anyone is interested.

1
jb42 1 point ago +1 / -0

This did not come from Rob Monster, their CEO. Did he "get COVID"? Christ...

by Yakub
1
jb42 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good Lord. Well, Communism it is then. Sigh

by cbarto4
4
jb42 4 points ago +4 / -0

Has it occured to anyone else that, if this has any value at all, this may be a plan by the Biden/Harris administration?

It'd make a whole lot more sense -- they'd certainly be more likely to know Trump would be removed from Twitter, "Pelosi or Pence", etc. In which case "Q" is the CIA. Coordinate out in the open all while calling it a right wing conspiracy theory.

Just throwing this out there.

2
jb42 2 points ago +2 / -0

Actually, if you read some documents from the Church in the past, it might surprise you. For example:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decree_against_Communism

(The "Hitler's Pope" stuff regarding Pius XII was actually Soviet propaganda, and VERY successful, and even shamefully repeated by many Protestants these days. See the book Disinformation by Pacepa.)

There are other encyclicals calling out Freemasonry, all kinds of things really... The Popes from even 50-100 years ago would be called tin-foil conspiracy theorists today. Good reading actually. It's amazing how successful propaganda has been.

P.S. It helps to ignore what the media tells you about the Church. Unsurprisingly they tend to lie or at least dishonestly frame.

4
jb42 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't see it on his site. Where should I look? FFS if you have proper facts make the damn thing obvious.

2
jb42 2 points ago +2 / -0

Interesting thing, North Carolina, I took screenshots of both the President and Senate races from 11/8 and 11/16, from North Carolina's official site. If you look at the mail-in ballot count, between those time periods, it actually went down for Trump and the Senate candidate. For nobody else. So things may be rigged there too. Kind of regret I didn't look at the Governor's race. Was it in 2020 as well?

1
jb42 1 point ago +1 / -0

First, we have a good list of Republicans who ought to be primaried now, in both the Senate and House. And who to donate to, and who to donate to the competitors of.

Second, we need to build up platforms that are not controlled. Even if they rig the vote again, if we can get platforms where we actually have a fair shake next time, it can be damn obvious to everyone, not just the few who actively hunt for the evidence.

I expect they'll try to lock the cheating in, so that it's harder to detect. But you have to at least oppose that however you can. It's shameful to just let them do it.

That's something. You never give up. If you have to fight another day, you do. It's all well and good to say "nothing to do", but there's nothing worse in life than to not try.

3
jb42 3 points ago +3 / -0

Are they meeting in person, given COVID? Are people seeing them in person, and if not, how do we know the justices have not been threatened in some way?

by Evspra
1
jb42 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just heard "let me be clear"...

1
jb42 1 point ago +1 / -0

Actually, I found on Gab this suggestion that the people doing the actual breaking in may have been Antifa: https://gab.com/TylerKeyes/posts/105510892362069180 https://gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/061/342/096/original/d1136d70270aa335.jpeg Not that this will matter to the media. I don't know what the tattoos mean, but, people ought to look into this.

1
jb42 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've been wondering about this actually. Why was Jan 6th not sent out on text message? Does the RNC fundraising not allow him to send messages to his donors?

1
jb42 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why does Pence have to follow this 'guidance'? How can they not have a recorded vote and yet claim it is binding? Pardon my ignorance..

view more: Next ›