I've actually seen them say "sources familiar with the White House's thinking". What the fuck is that even supposed to be? Houses can't think.

Biden winning the election is also disputed but I'm assuming if you tweet something about Biden winning it doesn't get the warning label.

and you can find nothing about what the supposed misinformation was. Probably because youtube is the one spreading misinformation about OAN

Digging further, it appears SCOTUS generally only hears the state supreme court cases that somehow involve the US Constitution or federal law, so yeah you may be right about this particular case not going to SCOTUS

"and sexist, must change it to Unx"

A state supreme court ruling can be appealed to SCOTUS

Edit: to add a source

Inb4 larp

Too late

It's a sin to post that without audio.

Total ballots cast is listed here and shows 1,327,394. Your pic is showing just Biden and Trump votes and is already above the ballots cast number at 1,373,376. Add in 3rd vote party votes to get the 1,405,376 number from OP

made a slight improvement

I think at current vote totals it's 222-213 Dems. Some are very close and aren't official yet

Looking at NYT results, as you said they have 27 listed as tossups and Republicans won (or leading) all 27.

They have 26 listed as "Republicans expected to win narrowly". Republicans won all 26 of those. The closest was +6 percentage points. 19 were by +10 or more.

They have 36 listed as "Democrats expected to win narrowly". Republicans won 7 of those. Only 3 did Dems win by 10 or more points

I'm supposed to believe Trump lost?

Edit: Just noticed you linked an article and most of this is already mentioned there.

True, good point. Looking at Philly, the turnout didn't increase enough for Biden to improve in vote difference. Hillary beat Trump by 475,277 and Biden beat Trump by 457,649

Looking at %, for both Biden and Trump. And the county of the city.

It's not true. Someone posted this above where you can see some other cities where Biden improved. I had started doing the same thing and quit when it was clear it wasn't true. Biden didn't even improve in Philly. 82.4% for Clinton, 81.3% for Biden. Trump went from 15.5% to 18.0%.

Maricopa County, which includes another large city in Mesa, had a bigger improvement for Biden than any of the 4 cities mentioned. Clinton to Biden went from 45.7% to 50.3% . Trump went from 49.1% to 48.1%. The claim is fake news though. Biden improved in lots of metro areas, and did not improve in Philadelphia

That image is enough to see this is fake news (the part about those 4 big cities being the only ones Biden didn't underperform Clinton). You can see from the image he performed better in other cities. I started doing the same for the 40 largest cities because like you I was annoyed at repeatedly seeing this claim with no data. San Diego improved for Biden. All the big cities in Texas improved for Biden except for El Paso. Huge improvement in Seattle. Detroit was barely an improvement. Philly actually improved for Trump, etc

good time to rewatch this classic

ok, you did use "got" in the post title though

This in no way means Biden got 100% of Unaffiliated voters. Still interesting and suspicious

A better way to look at it is being a 91.4% decrease

and from that section

Our analysis of your office's publicly available data shows that the number of rejected absentee ballots in Georgia plummeted from 3.5% in 2018 to 0.3% in 2020

not quite, GA (or MI) + WI + NV isn't enough. The best explanation I can come up with is he needs any 3 of those unless 1 of the 3 is NV, then he would need the other 2 to be any 2 that aren't AZ, or AZ+PA.

polls were closed when they called it

This needs to be stickied. This is huge. 100% incontrovertible evidence that Dems were intentionally breaking the law.