28

Here we go:

  1. it is standard procedure to have the American States Organization (OAS) recognize elections in the american hemisphere (the UN never did this, it's the OAS);

  2. in 2019 there was a weird election in Bolivia, sitting president decided he'd run for a fourth forbidden term and changed the constitution against the will of the people;

  3. in Bolivia there are lots of parties, the system works in 2 steps, the first one usually discards everyone but the top two candidates;

  4. however if you get enough votes on the first step (a threshold) you can win it right away without the need for a second step (I think this is also how senate races work in GA);

  5. during the live count, the counting STOPPED without explanation and then, later when it resumed, a big dump of votes were added to a certain candidate so that he would beat the threshold.

Now why this is interesting:

  1. a panel of American states found consensus in investigating the election (fucking Cucknada funded the report);

  2. the US (Trump admin) was one of the states that called the election fraudulent AND THE DEMS WERE SILENT ABOUT IT;

  3. that IS PRECEDENT on a court of law pedes.

The US courts cannot understand fraud in one and not in the other. The same must also hold for Canada, Mexico and everyone else who claimed that one fraudulent since the election of a head of state is a domestic matter as much as is an international one; and even though there is a lot of difference in geopolitical weight between the US and Bolivia the technical evaluation of election integrity does not take that into account.

Some reading:

https://www.oas.org/fpdb/press/Audit-Report-EN-vFINAL.pdf (Just read pages 4 to 6. Tech savvy/auditors might want to take a look on the exact tools used.)

https://www.globalresearch.ca/2019-bolivian-precedent-justifies-trump-accusations-fraud/5728716

This case should be a walk in the park.

22

Such a small change, huge implications.

38
14
32
16

Cuckjack is now a firefighter, except he is a little bitch skipping arms, legs and torso days.

Others have control of the platform. He only takes the punches. And he will go to jail for it.

The question is why. What could they have on him?

26

Believe it or not, he managed to come in second place beating the guy with the glasses.

15

"Media" was an instrument for the connection between regular people and information. Sure it helped when people needed morse code and shit.

It is not needed anymore and worse, to delay their extinction they must simultaneously fight i) free and true flow of information and ii) direct democracy.

An average Don can talk to the president and its representatives directly now via fucking shitwitter, whatever party they're in. Media's only job is to thwart communication, undermining democracy and the will of the people.

34
32
100
64
10
46
31
29
14

So I was thinking the other day what a great opportunity it would be to just bet against socialists that they're losing again (or rather that their zoo safe space handlers are fabricating polls and news again). I mean, it's nice to win, but also grabbing their money would just be a sublime pedagogical experience.

It can't be high stakes because, well, they won't pay that's just bad business. Must be the lowest amount possible just enough to be symbolical.

So, I bring thee 2 (3?) questions with hopes of creating a discussion.

1 - how/where could we find such a place to do this kind of stuff? I don't want to do it with randoms in the internet, I want to specifically bet against acquaintances, even better if I can gather all my progressive friends in one pot. But I want to make it "somewhat official" and "ceremonial" so to amplify said pedagogical effect (and have them feel the discomfort of losing).

2 - how do you guys really see this thing going on? I'm honestly much more inclined to believe in a landslide this time than last time around (I'm foreigner so yeah, I got served the crap info then) and I am thinking about offering them odds where they only pay if the electoral college margin is a greater than what it was against Clinton.

3 - lastly, every time I come here I'm required to click through a dozen motherfucking trains to access the site and this doesn't happen anywhere else. Again my IP is not from the US, could that be it?

Thanks for any insight peeps.