In general, communication providers are either treated as an ISP or publisher. An ISP (like a telephone service provider) doesn't regulate what you are allowed to say through it's service and can't be be held legally responsible for anything said through it's service. A publisher can curate content but is held responsible for what is posted on it's site (think CNN or a news site).
Section 230 says the social media platforms can curate content while not being held responsible for the content that remains up.
I still don't understand what the plan was. Fox had 2 target demos to go after, the left or the right. As the only legacy media outlet that was considered right wing, why would they decide to throw that all away to fight for a piece of the left's market? It's not as if the left like Fox or would have positive associations with it anyway.
All the people running it will do is lose money for the company. Do they really hate Trump so much as to tank their company's value?
I was dumb. I thought we had to mail in those ballots and that voting in person would have a better chance of being counted, so I got rid of my mail-in ballot. Didn't know they wouldn't count provisional ballots done in person...
Incorrect. You had to have a disability to use the electronic machine. You could go and get a provisional paper ballot no problem. That's what I did (the latter).
You're right about provisional ballots not being counted until after the mail in ballots.
Tell them you can't afford that, but ask them what they can do. A lot of dentists will lower their prices. You could also ask about a payment plan on top of that. Figure out what you can spend first and go from there.
Wishing you a lot of luck!
I dont think he's a current senator and able to vote on the matter. But he said he would if he could IIRC.