A White House petition can only have 800 characters. I rewrote this for you and it is 764 characters. Don't know if it helps or not. Good work on the longer one!
Mr. President,
The power of the people continues to be diminished and we now are at risk of losing our most sacred right to a free and fair election. We have peacefully requested redress for every violation. Our government has been deaf to our pleas. Our Republic cannot peacefully continue under such circumstances.
Mr. President, we the people request you use any means necessary, through judicial recourse, the insurrection act, or any legal constitutional action to defend your victory, our Republic, and all Americans against what is to come if you and we allow our constitution to be violated blatantly without recourse. In these actions, you will have overwhelming support from nearly 80 million citizens, who ask you now to continue to stand and fight.
I think it's part of an effort to get Assange some positive public exposure as I really do believe he will be pardoned. I pray.
COVID-19 Pt. 2: CDC’s New “PIC” and The Hidden Data:
"Most people aren’t aware that the CDC has lumped influenza together with Covid and pneumonia in death rates with a new name called “PIC.” This comes after the CDC confirmed that only 6% of Covid-related death certificates indicate Covid as the only cause, while 94% list other illnesses as the cause with an average of 2.6 comorbidities." ~~
https://www.coreysdigs.com/health-science/covid-19-pt-2-cdcs-new-pic-and-the-hidden-data/
The Johns Hopkins Newsletter: A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19:
" ... the total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19. This suggests,according to Briand, that the COVID-19 death toll is misleading. Briand believes that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratorydiseases, influenza and pneumonia may instead be recategorized as being due to COVID-19."
This is excellent sourced information, but I think the wealth numbers are a little understated. I think Feinstein is extremely wealthy. And McConnel also.
This is text from the Resolution (Resolved) which was not adopted. However, there can still be resubmissions with more research results, anecdotals, and observation data. Someone in this thread pointed out the AMA is a private, not elected or government entity. Part of the swamp network and given undue influence.
COVID-19 Pt. 2: CDC’s New “PIC” and The Hidden Data:
"Most people aren’t aware that the CDC has lumped influenza together with Covid and pneumonia in death rates with a new name called “PIC.” This comes after the CDC confirmed that only 6% of Covid-related death certificates indicate Covid as the only cause, while 94% list other illnesses as the cause with an average of 2.6 comorbidities." ~~
https://www.coreysdigs.com/health-science/covid-19-pt-2-cdcs-new-pic-and-the-hidden-data/
The Johns Hopkins Newsletter: A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19:
" ... the total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19. This suggests,according to Briand, that the COVID-19 death toll is misleading. Briand believes that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratorydiseases, influenza and pneumonia may instead be recategorized as being due to COVID-19."
This is not accurate. A resolution, 509, was brought which was not adopted. The quotes are from that resolution, but it was not adopted. Instead, the AMA reaffirmed their existing policy H-120.988 about doctor-patient independence and access, but only with FDA approved medications, of which HCQ is not. Just need to be a little careful in the information being posted esp with newcomers and increased scrutiny.
In the wrong hands, this could be touted as a conspiracy theory.
https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2020-11/nov20-ref-comm-e.pdf p 15
I actually have to hit the mute button even though his commercials are only 30 seconds long. Cruel and unusual.
I posted and sourced this because I wasn't sure of its accuracy. But if a governor of a state has certified the results, would a republican then vote against that - a certified election result? This is where I am not certain. Thanks for the information. Read it twice but still not sure I get it.
This is a no-win vote shaping up for Senate Republicans from purplish states. On January 6, when Congress meets to officially record the votes of the electoral college, any state’s electoral votes can be challenged if one member of the House and one member of the Senate object. In that case, each chamber would debate for two hours and then hold a floor vote on whether to accept those electoral votes or not. If the two chambers deadlock, with the House voting yes and the Senate voting no, then the results certified by the governor of that state become the tiebreaker.
Which is a fancy way of saying that there’s no way to block Biden’s victory. Even if Senate Republicans provide 51 votes to reject Georgia’s electoral votes, for instance, the Democratic House would obviously vote to accept them. Brian Kemp’s certification of Biden’s win would then break the deadlock. The same would be true for Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, all of which have certified Biden’s victory. There’s nothing congressional Republicans can do to stop Sleepy Joe.
The only suspense on January 6 is whether Cruz or some other Republican in the Senate will wage another pointless fight to reject certain states’ electoral votes. Rep. Mo Brooks has already vowed to object in the House; all that’s missing is a Senate counterpart to join him.
McConnell and the leadership are already worried about it and angling to make sure there isn’t one. What do you do if you’re forced to cast that ballot? Embarrass yourself and the party by voting to reject, potentially angering swing voters back home? Or vote to accept the results and end up being primaried by some creature like this?
This is such a knotty dilemma for Republicans that I wonder if some Senate Democrat won’t make mischief by objecting to the swing-state results himself. In tandem with Brooks’s objection in the House, that would force a floor vote on the results. Maybe the Dems will make the GOP eat it on this even if McConnell succeeds in convincing his own caucus not to object.
This is a no-win vote shaping up for Senate Republicans from purplish states. On January 6, when Congress meets to officially record the votes of the electoral college, any state’s electoral votes can be challenged if one member of the House and one member of the Senate object. In that case, each chamber would debate for two hours and then hold a floor vote on whether to accept those electoral votes or not. If the two chambers deadlock, with the House voting yes and the Senate voting no, then the results certified by the governor of that state become the tiebreaker.
Which is a fancy way of saying that there’s no way to block Biden’s victory. Even if Senate Republicans provide 51 votes to reject Georgia’s electoral votes, for instance, the Democratic House would obviously vote to accept them. Brian Kemp’s certification of Biden’s win would then break the deadlock. The same would be true for Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, all of which have certified Biden’s victory. There’s nothing congressional Republicans can do to stop Sleepy Joe.
The only suspense on January 6 is whether Cruz or some other Republican in the Senate will wage another pointless fight to reject certain states’ electoral votes. Rep. Mo Brooks has already vowed to object in the House; all that’s missing is a Senate counterpart to join him.
McConnell and the leadership are already worried about it and angling to make sure there isn’t one. What do you do if you’re forced to cast that ballot? Embarrass yourself and the party by voting to reject, potentially angering swing voters back home? Or vote to accept the results and end up being primaried by some creature like this?
This is such a knotty dilemma for Republicans that I wonder if some Senate Democrat won’t make mischief by objecting to the swing-state results himself. In tandem with Brooks’s objection in the House, that would force a floor vote on the results. Maybe the Dems will make the GOP eat it on this even if McConnell succeeds in convincing his own caucus not to object.
This is a no-win vote shaping up for Senate Republicans from purplish states. On January 6, when Congress meets to officially record the votes of the electoral college, any state’s electoral votes can be challenged if one member of the House and one member of the Senate object. In that case, each chamber would debate for two hours and then hold a floor vote on whether to accept those electoral votes or not. If the two chambers deadlock, with the House voting yes and the Senate voting no, then the results certified by the governor of that state become the tiebreaker.
Which is a fancy way of saying that there’s no way to block Biden’s victory. Even if Senate Republicans provide 51 votes to reject Georgia’s electoral votes, for instance, the Democratic House would obviously vote to accept them. Brian Kemp’s certification of Biden’s win would then break the deadlock. The same would be true for Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, all of which have certified Biden’s victory. There’s nothing congressional Republicans can do to stop Sleepy Joe.
The only suspense on January 6 is whether Cruz or some other Republican in the Senate will wage another pointless fight to reject certain states’ electoral votes. Rep. Mo Brooks has already vowed to object in the House; all that’s missing is a Senate counterpart to join him.
McConnell and the leadership are already worried about it and angling to make sure there isn’t one. What do you do if you’re forced to cast that ballot? Embarrass yourself and the party by voting to reject, potentially angering swing voters back home? Or vote to accept the results and end up being primaried by some creature like this?
This is such a knotty dilemma for Republicans that I wonder if some Senate Democrat won’t make mischief by objecting to the swing-state results himself. In tandem with Brooks’s objection in the House, that would force a floor vote on the results. Maybe the Dems will make the GOP eat it on this even if McConnell succeeds in convincing his own caucus not to object.
This is a no-win vote shaping up for Senate Republicans from purplish states. On January 6, when Congress meets to officially record the votes of the electoral college, any state’s electoral votes can be challenged if one member of the House and one member of the Senate object. In that case, each chamber would debate for two hours and then hold a floor vote on whether to accept those electoral votes or not. If the two chambers deadlock, with the House voting yes and the Senate voting no, then the results certified by the governor of that state become the tiebreaker.
Which is a fancy way of saying that there’s no way to block Biden’s victory. Even if Senate Republicans provide 51 votes to reject Georgia’s electoral votes, for instance, the Democratic House would obviously vote to accept them. Brian Kemp’s certification of Biden’s win would then break the deadlock. The same would be true for Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, all of which have certified Biden’s victory. There’s nothing congressional Republicans can do to stop Sleepy Joe.
The only suspense on January 6 is whether Cruz or some other Republican in the Senate will wage another pointless fight to reject certain states’ electoral votes. Rep. Mo Brooks has already vowed to object in the House; all that’s missing is a Senate counterpart to join him.
McConnell and the leadership are already worried about it and angling to make sure there isn’t one. What do you do if you’re forced to cast that ballot? Embarrass yourself and the party by voting to reject, potentially angering swing voters back home? Or vote to accept the results and end up being primaried by some creature like this?
This is such a knotty dilemma for Republicans that I wonder if some Senate Democrat won’t make mischief by objecting to the swing-state results himself. In tandem with Brooks’s objection in the House, that would force a floor vote on the results. Maybe the Dems will make the GOP eat it on this even if McConnell succeeds in convincing his own caucus not to object.
This is a no-win vote shaping up for Senate Republicans from purplish states. On January 6, when Congress meets to officially record the votes of the electoral college, any state’s electoral votes can be challenged if one member of the House and one member of the Senate object. In that case, each chamber would debate for two hours and then hold a floor vote on whether to accept those electoral votes or not. If the two chambers deadlock, with the House voting yes and the Senate voting no, then the results certified by the governor of that state become the tiebreaker.
Which is a fancy way of saying that there’s no way to block Biden’s victory. Even if Senate Republicans provide 51 votes to reject Georgia’s electoral votes, for instance, the Democratic House would obviously vote to accept them. Brian Kemp’s certification of Biden’s win would then break the deadlock. The same would be true for Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, all of which have certified Biden’s victory. There’s nothing congressional Republicans can do to stop Sleepy Joe.
The only suspense on January 6 is whether Cruz or some other Republican in the Senate will wage another pointless fight to reject certain states’ electoral votes. Rep. Mo Brooks has already vowed to object in the House; all that’s missing is a Senate counterpart to join him.
McConnell and the leadership are already worried about it and angling to make sure there isn’t one. What do you do if you’re forced to cast that ballot? Embarrass yourself and the party by voting to reject, potentially angering swing voters back home? Or vote to accept the results and end up being primaried by some creature like this?
This is such a knotty dilemma for Republicans that I wonder if some Senate Democrat won’t make mischief by objecting to the swing-state results himself. In tandem with Brooks’s objection in the House, that would force a floor vote on the results. Maybe the Dems will make the GOP eat it on this even if McConnell succeeds in convincing his own caucus not to object.
I agree. But it would serve their narrative and cowardice well.
99.9% of Americans have never heard the name of Lin Wood. He is focused on talking to the base warriors and presents about the average number of conspiracy theories. He is harmless in that sense, and I don't really think the MSM cares much about him either.
As far as his career, he has pretty much committed professional suicide in terms of his practice. The misunderstanding about Kyle, I think anyway, is that he pledged his firm, not his personal representation.
We need to be more like the dems in these days, unless there is an absolute moral imperative, we should not speak ill of each other - everyone is finding their way and figuring out what they should do.
I think the SC court is trying to set the narrative that they might violate the constitution in the coming days, but it was for a good reason - to prevent civil disorder and riots.
I don't know if I agree. The coughs sounded fake to me, and I really didn't see him trying to suppress them. Actually, just the opposite. Most people speaking publicly would have stifled a cough or sneeze as long as they could. He didn't do that. Who knows.
you are ignoring the possibility that this could be a clerk for a dem justice and is out there stirring things up ... or laying the ground for a new narrative. talking points politicians and others do it all the time.
fan fiction
COVID-19 Pt. 2: CDC’s New “PIC” and The Hidden Data:
"Most people aren’t aware that the CDC has lumped influenza together with Covid and pneumonia in death rates with a new name called “PIC.” This comes after the CDC confirmed that only 6% of Covid-related death certificates indicate Covid as the only cause, while 94% list other illnesses as the cause with an average of 2.6 comorbidities." ~~
https://www.coreysdigs.com/health-science/covid-19-pt-2-cdcs-new-pic-and-the-hidden-data/
The Johns Hopkins Newsletter: A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19:
" ... the total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19. This suggests,according to Briand, that the COVID-19 death toll is misleading. Briand believes that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratorydiseases, influenza and pneumonia may instead be recategorized as being due to COVID-19."
It isn't - it would seem to be a responsibility of lawyers, lawmakers (haha) or voter integrity groups. Or just old fashioned local politics aka cya.
The governor's emergency declared all WI voters were indefinitely confined due to the pandemic, thus waiving the need for photo ID with absentee ballots. The ruling knocks that order, and goes on to say that only a voter or elector can designate themselves indefinitely confined, and the indefinitely confined determination by individual voters can only be based on age, physical illness or infirmity. Pretty heavy knockdown.
"Petition for Original Action that seeks a declaration that (1)Respondents lack the authority to issue an interpretation of Wisconsin's election law allowing all electors in Dane County to obtain an absentee ballot without a photo identification and (2)Governor Evers' Emergency Order #12 ("Emergency Order #12") did not authorize all Wisconsin voters to obtain an absentee ballot without a photo identification.
¶2To answer these questions, we interpret Wis. Stat. §6.86(2)(a) (2017–18).1 In so doing, we conclude §6.86(2)(a)requires that (1)each individual elector make his or her own determination as to whether the elector is indefinitely confined; (2) an elector's determination may be based only upon age, physical illness or infirmity; and (3) an elector is indefinitely confined for his or her own age, physical illness or infirmity, not those of another person."
This question will be solved when they track down the MI election officials who were in charge or on site. They need names and those names probably participated in the "fraud" and will likely sing loftily.
This is not accurate. A resolution, 509, was brought which was not adopted. The quotes are from that resolution, but it was not adopted. Instead, the AMA reaffirmed their existing policy H-120.988 about doctor-patient independence and access, but only with FDA approved medications, of which HCQ is not. Just need to be a little careful in the information being posted esp with newcomers and increased scrutiny.
In the wrong hands, this could be touted as a conspiracy theory.
https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2020-11/nov20-ref-comm-e.pdf p 15