Are we doing the same thing as the left here? Where is the entire video, why are we inserting "mistakenly walked past them" when the video doesnt show that. To me this is exactly the same as the left. You are putting your own spin on it without the necessary evidence to back that claim. Nobody should be stomping on an old man like that, but why go the extra mile and say its simply because he "unknowingly walked by" how do we know he didnt walk by and say "fuck you n-words".
I see cucks framing this as a slaughter of blacks, is it a celebration of end of slavery or not?
Shut up with your logic!
No.
The thing that sucks is that a lot of the narrative still trying to say hes lying is not only that he waited so long to make the correction but specifically that he had a televised thing at 2PM and didnt mention it there. Like I said he should have addressed this first thing when he woke up and it would have corrected a lot of the damage. Especially with people claiming it started from some racist narrative in Miami in 1968. He waited too long IMO but its still better than nothing
Well well well looks like he did it.
Thats their fault. It should have been an immediate clarification in the early AM. "Looting leads to innocents being shot and killed within the riots and that is what President Trump meant in his tweet. However the National Gaurd will be deployed and proper measures will be taken to get the situation under control"
Its not hard.
Totally agree. I am speaking simple logical and rational thoughts and these people are calling me a concern troll. Its pathetic. Trump has been making record headway into the black community over the last 3 years and I fear it could all be thrown away by a tweet that is being misrepresented on purpose.
Not a concern troll bud, its common sense to not add fuel to the fire. I live in a city that riots might be starting. Its just ridiculous to want to see riots start all over the USA just to say "look at these terrorists" - how about we try to stop as much of the riots as possible and then deal with the ones that do start accordingly which may or may not end with violence towards these terrorists? Common sense no? Or should we add fuel to the fire just cause?
Not change the riots that began, but to help prevent riots from beginning in other cities yes.
Thats not what I said. All im saying is to stop the MSM from fueling the fire and starting more fires and more riots in new cities with increasing outrage. Thats all. Its logical, it doesnt stop anything hes going to do with the military, I didnt tell Trump to not do anything, I am saying to clarify to stop the fueling of the fire. This narrative isnt good for us no matter how biased you are vs domestic terrorism. We shouldnt encourage the violence tho and this narrative is going to encourage it
I said to prevent other riots and putting fuel on the fire. Of course it didnt start because of it, it happened before the tweet. But it seems most of you are being biased. I had a lot of friends make stories or posts about this incident that never post about any BLM stuff. People were united entirely behind this particular cop incident. Im fine with Trump calling rioters and looters thugs, but why let the entire world misinterpret that you want to kill civilians - anybody arguing for that is just as biased and stupid as the people on the left.
You cant say that its a good idea for a narrative to run wild that you want to kill civilians. No matter how bad you think these people are and yes a lot of what they are doing is terrorism but it doesnt matter, this isnt the time to just sit back and be like "welp we know were right so who cares what everyone else thinks" - you say that these people dont care about businesses etc and youd rather Trump not clarify and add fuel to the fire for other cities to burn as well? Pathetic that so many people are replying to my post this way
Yeah there are just such obvious slam dunks, even Trump, why is he not taking this opportunity to tweet a bunch of examples studies and a video of tons of prom dems from the past talking about that voter fraud. They miss so many slamdunks its really frustrating to watch. I feel like if I was in charge of PR for the trump campaign i would literally destroy people beyond measure on a daily basis
What frustrates me is that people including our best keyboard warriors with a real voice are pretty bad at pointing out some of these flaws in good ways. When he tweets this why isnt Grenell like "you seriously are still repeating lies right now, you know full well the transcript shows that Crowdstrike said the servers WERE NOT HACKED" I mean thats just the ultimate ultra slam dunk and then put a picture of the crowdstrike transcript and its GG, over. You cant recover from that. But they are bad at that shit.
The Manafort polling data is what? Fill me in if you dont mind - the other 3 I know are BS especially the last one lmfao. They act like thats Trump literally aksing them when the same documents they are constantly discussing in this twitter exchange proves that Crowdstrike had no evidence not only did Russians not hack the DNC but that nobody hacked the DNC lol........... Incredible
Where in this clip does it indicate this is Trumps fault?
Am I reading this right that the mortality from HCQ itself is .00009?
What does he mean when hes trying to say its "GOP-lead" ? Because Mueller was a "Republican" - Whats the argument trying to be made there? Can someone enlighten me?
What do you mean? Hes basically dedicating his life to breaking the narratives and then hes posting a graph that inadvertently keeps the BLM narrative alive....
The average black IS NOT more likely. Did you even read what I wrote? If you are committing 70%+ of violent crime lets say of total violent and aggressive crime, and you only represent 27% of the deaths by cops, you are UNDERrepresented per criminality.
If we took the amount of crimes committed per capita of blacks, compared to crimes committed by whites, then you take that statistic and compare it to police deaths, blacks would actually be severely underrepresented.
Thats like saying if I invented a new race and I got 100% of them to try and murder cops so they got shot and then they represent 95% of people cops killed but only 0.5% of the population then I could argue that they are racist against them? Of course not. You would have to point to the fact that they are actively putting themselves in that position per capita to justify the amount of times they are dying per capita. Thats whe whole argument Candace owens and others make, nobody talks about it cause it doesnt fit the fake narrative.
Again I am not saying there arent any racist cops and there arent any unjustified killings of blacks that were racially motivated, of course there are, but it is not an epidemic at all, the statistics prove that by and large people are not targeting anybody and even with the case with George, everyone is in agreement that it is total bullshit, but they claim they tried to put him in the car for 10 mins (could be a lie) and hes also clearly on drugs. So is that an excuse, no, i think that cop should be put in jail, BUT to say that its just this innocent good-hearted black man doing nothing wrong in his life is total BS. If youre being arrested for being a junkie or w/e it was he was being arrested for, the narrative of lke "im scared to go to sleep just cause im black" is total bullshit. In 99%+ if these killings the person was a criminal, had a gun, was on drugs or selling drugs, resisted arrest at some point in the altercation, used foul language etc. Are they all justified because of this, again no. But the narrative that if you are a respectable person who happens to have black skin, you arent doing drugs in public, you arent committing a crime, and you interact with the cops in a civil manner that you have a significantly higher chance of dying than another race or that its even an actual thought on your mind as a threat is a legit fake narrative. It simply doesnt exist. The real stories would be out there but they arent, the best they can do is present 99% of cases where the person had a gun/was or just committed a crime and in most cases even resisted arrest. So why is all the narrative that im raeding that people have to explain to their kids that they are scared to walk down the street cause they might die
Im surprised that Larry was dumb enough to tweet this graph. It proves the point hes trying to make but to the uneducated on the other topics and statistics this makes it seem like the rate of blacks being killed is significantly higher than whites.
Population statistics for rate of death is pathetically illogical and intellectually dishonest despite being true.
If African Americans are responsible for 50%+ of Murder and 70%+ of violent crime and the culture holds a much higher anti-cop mentality then the CONTEXT of the statistic of more blacks per capita being shot is ridiculously stupid.
Black culprits consist of far above 55% of crimes that would lead to an altercation that might cause a cop to take his gun out, yet they only represent 30%-ish of the deaths, within context the deaths are lack of a better word "correct". This graph was very stupid of Larry to post IMO, far better way to make his point without giving another false narrative. Most of the comments on his insta when I looked last night were people talking about "doenst this mean blacks are killed at a higher rate?"
No point to argue with you. If you dont see a problem youre just stupid. You are being exactly what we accurse the left of, you want to disbelieve in a left narrative so badly that you have full cognitive bias going on. I am not saying this incident was racist, I am saying it is negligence to the highest degree which qutie possibly ended in the death that could have been avoided. If you dont agree you are simply one of the two, dumb or biased, possibly both
To kneel on someone TO GET THEM IN CUFFS is okay. To sit there forever on someones throat is ridiculously stupid to argue. The dude is already in cuffs and theres several men there, why would it be standard procedure to stick your knee/shin on someones neck for minutes extended once someone has already been apprehended? America has a cop problem when it comes to the amount of people we kill by cops, not blacks specifically but in totality, is part of that problem the American culture specifically the anti-cop views of poor neighborhoods (of any race) absolutely, but when a dude has ALREADY been searched, they know he has no guns, they know he has no knife, hes already in handcuffs to try and justify that you should continue leaning directly on someones face/head/neck is just so absurdly stupid and trust me, I take the argument to my liberal friends in one of the most SJW places in the world regularly about BLM and black statistics, but this was just bad cop behavior, not necessarily racist because they do it to whites also, but we should not condone this cop behavior
But who cares? At that point hes in handcuffs, with multiple people, you dont need your pressure on his neck, if much rahter them even tie his legs or cuff his legs or do all sorts of stuff that wlil make it impossible for him to get away or grab a gun than the need to do that, especially in public like that. BLM is a joke cause we know the statistics point to more white deaths, black males killing cops at a higher rate than white cops killing black males etc etc but theres basically no justification at that point to keep your pressure on someones neck, if you have to sit him down and have a tazer literally pointed at his chest and very loudly say "if you move I am going to taze you" then so be it, but why do this, its stupid beyond measure and nobody should be arguing that
... go look at my post history u fucking low IQ retard. Where is the evidence that thats the only reason he was attacked. You better up your IQ if you want to hang iwth the big boys. All we see all day long is selective edit videos from the left not showing the whole picture, im saying we cant interject opinions on something if the video doesnt show it