Liberals never see the unintended consequences. In the early 90's they passed a luxury tax on yachts to 'soak the rich'. What REALLY happened? Middle class boat workers were laid off as the boats became too expensive.

So, with all the censorship of conservatives and Trump supporters, and the violent tactics used to 'keep them in line', what is the unforeseen unintended consequence?

Culturally, Trump supporters will develop a subtle kinship with blacks. Trump already has gained some black support and actually did better in this past elections with minorities than the vast majority of Republicans. Now, the plight of conservatives will start to subtly resonate with the black experience.

We will end up having much more in common with blacks and that crack may very well start to spread. We already know that the black community tends to be more religious and is actually more socially conservative than they vote.

Look for the LEFT to become 'the man' now. And look for conservatives to start to make more inroads to masses of people that the democrats have always depended upon to stay in office. Won't be overnight. But I think this is a distinct possibility.

For some reason that movie came to mind...

1. Biden and Harris are sworn in. It's gonna happen.

2. Biden, Harris, Pelosi and Schumer will BADLY overplay their hand. They will see this as their one chance to enact all kinds of UN-Constitutional B.S. and most of it will cause significant backlash. The left is NOT in touch with anyone but the most left-leaning bozos. They would not have won without cheating... keep that in mind.

3. Republican State legislatures will pass some degree of voting reforms in GA, PA and any other Republican run state houses.

4. At some point, probably 2021, the U.S. markets will go through at LEAST an intermediate bear market. That actually could be very close. I chart the S&P 500 every day since 2010. I know of what I speak. These new all-time highs will not last much longer before we head down at least 20% again.

5. Joe Biden will show more and more signs of language and cognitive issues. He may even suffer another stroke. He will not make it 4 years and, going just from my gut, the over/under is probably 20 months. Pelosi also starts to have more cognitive issues.

6. By the 2022 mid-terms, things will have been sufficiently fucked up by liberals that there will be a 1994 v2.0 retaking of the entire Congress. This will be even MORE likely if we do NOT have to deal with some retarded third party to shave points off the conservatives who actually STAND a chance. THINK people... THINK. No Clinton/Perot repeat here. LEARN from history.

7. Manchin will side more and more with Republicans in the Senate. He may even change parties though he swears he never would. But... things change.

8. Overall DEATHS for 2020, if properly analyzed, will show that COVID-19 caused EXCESS deaths that are about like a bad flu season. A post-mortem will be done on the entire plandemic debacle and in retrospect it will be learned that Cuomo was an idiot, Fauci was a fool, and our response made the problems worse.

9. The Kraken will become a meme for all the wrong reasons.

10. People will down vote this post because it does not offer a complete restoration of all we thought was holy by noon tomorrow.

Ross Perot and his third party run in 1992.

Had there NOT been a third party... 'Bill Clinton' would now be the answer to a difficult trivia question in a Pizza Joint Trivia Contest.

And, in my opinion, anything that starts to regain the momentum in a return to Constitutional governance HAS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED under the brand name 'Republican'.

'Republican' is just a PLACEHOLDER for the people who occupy that party. Just like the Democrat party of today bears NO resemblance to the Democrat party of even the mid 1990's... the Republican Party IS THE WAY to accomplish effective political change in this country.

People like to talk about Trump playing 4D chess or such. Aside from the fact that ALL chess is 4D (time being the 4th dimension), Chess has no third player option.

The MOST successful third party in the last century was Ross Perot. And what was GAINED by it?

Wrong question. What was LOST is the correct question. GHWB lost to Clinton who gained ONLY 43% of the popular vote. Had Perot never entered that race, Bill Clinton would be the answer to a trivia question at a Pizza joint on Tuesday nights. Hillary Clinton would have never been a player at all.

Do a third party now and you will get an even WORSE result as the next Democrat Presidential candidate will be far left of Clinton.

Focus your energy on SHAPING and FORMING the Republican Party into more Gaetz's, Cruz's and even Paul's.

If the left can hijack the Democrat Party and make it socialist then WE can hijack the Republican Party and make it Constitutionalist.

When nations rage and when broad political aims and goals are lost, never lose sight of the fact that everyone, as an individual, can be a powerful influence to those whose lives we actually touch.

We like to castigate the left for only caring when they can do so with 'other people's money' but as things cease going our way on the stage of large ideas we need to find more and more comfort in finding solid meaning in the smaller world of our own communities.

Be kind and considerate. Then let people know you are a conservative.

The world is a really screwed up place. Nothing new there. Make your personal world a really well-centered and balanced place. Still be active politically... that's great, but be effective as a person too.

A liberal gets up in the morning and heads out to a "RIGHT TO CHOOSE" rally in their city where they celebrate a woman's right to kill an innocent baby in the womb or even while in the process of birth.

6 hours later, the same liberal drives 50 miles to the local state penitentiary where a man convicted of murdering a family of four is scheduled to be put to death. The very same liberal who celebrated the taking of innocent life in the morning is NOW shedding bitter tears over the execution of a man who is a convicted murderer.

I have asked this question to myself and others hundreds of times and never could figure it out... as I typed this out for you this very moment I realized what the answer is...

Can you put YOUR finger on it?

What's the difference between a 2016 Hillary voter and a 2020 Trump voter?

No... really.

I want to know.

Last night, Georgians voted for two Senators who can rightly be described thusly:

1. Raphael Warnock - a preacher of hate who despises white privilege.

2. Jon Ossoff - the POSTER BOY of WHITE PRIVILEGE

Explain THAT one without referring to God's incredible sense of humor.

I just did a quick search of Absentee Ballot Drop Box locations in the Atlanta metro area. Warnock's web site has a search function for these and it says the service is provided by the Democrat Party.

I decided to count the number of drop boxes that were within a 6 mile radius of various zip codes. I chose 5 zip codes based upon what I know about the areas.

30033 - Decatur (Dekalb County). 17 drop boxes in a 6 mile radius. Decatur is ultra-liberal. Perhaps the LGBTQ capital of GA and also a heavy black population in the area just east of Atlanta. This is a tad less than 1 drop box per 2 square miles.

30303 - Atlanta zip code. 16 drop boxes. Liberal stronghold.

30096 - Gwinnett County. Purple County mostly. 5 boxed in 6 mile radius.

30009 - Alpharetta. North Fulton. Think affluence. North Fulton is a 50/50 area if you look at Congressional seats with tight races, the last being won my a democrat. 6 drop boxes in a 6 mile radius.

30144 - Kennesaw. Cobb County. Kennesaw is the city that passed legislation back in the 80's that every family that could legally own one... is legally required TO OWN a firearm. It was a symbolic piece of legislation as I do not think anyone has ever been charged... but crime in Kennesaw went way down. how many drop boxes in Kennesaw? 4 in a 6 mile radius.

Fact is... it is EASIER to vote in democrat areas than in republican ones.

That does not seem right.

Any time you are presented with a VIDEO AD that supports a LIBERAL cause... let it run to completion.

Add charges are based on exposure and if an ad runs for the full duration, the party who is paying for the ad will pay MORE than if you hit the 'Skip Ad' button.

So, I SKIP the Loeffler and Purdue ads and let Warnock and Ossoff pay for the full ad impression.

If we ALL did this... it would mean more expense to the democrats.

Those advocating staying home in the Georgia Senate runoffs or who are pushing for a third party...

It's the same thing as voting for the LIBERAL.

Vote for the MOST CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN AVAILABLE. That is how this gets changed. If they are not CONSERVATIVE enough for you... then not voting is a half vote cast FOR a DEMOCRAT.

Hyperbole to fact ratio hits NEW HIGHS!

Tired of this stupidity.

It was funny, marginally, the first time.

It's lost what little charm it initially had.

Maybe... I dunno... Twinkies? Funnel cakes?

Don't swallow everything you hear, hook, line and sinker.

There's a lot of horse shit being put forth, likely by bad actors, who want to muddy the waters with falsehoods and disinformation. A couple of 'stories' that right now have NO corroboration...

1. The GBI agent who has alleged to have committed suicide this week was investigating the Deal auto death. I have seen no real evidence of this, but Lin Wood has retweeted it.

2. For that matter, the reported detail that the engine block was thrown a large distance from the car. Did someone see that in an accident report? I have not seen it.

3. Ruby Freeman (mis-identified in the claim as her daughter) has started to sing and is turning on others who were in on the Fulton County shenanigans. This was 'told' by 'someone who is close to things', Uh-huh. Well, I'll believe it when the facts show it to be true.

I hope these things do lead to more pressure being brought to bear on those who seem to not be properly motivated to get to the bottom of this election and its profound abnormalities. But I think ALL are better served with a healthy degree of skepticism that keeps us grounded in facts and in what can be proven to be true.

Maybe there is a 'blue dress' or two. But so far... a lot of claims with precious little to back it up.

Third parties.

The closest a THIRD PARTY has ever come in an election in modern times was Ross Perot, who took about 8% of the popular vote.

Conservatives VOTED for Perot and what did we actually GET?

BILL CLINTON and his insufferable business partner, Hillary.

So shut up about the third party crap. It AIN'T gonna work again exactly like it NEVER worked before... EXCEPT to the ADVANTAGE of liberals.

Get it through your thick skulls. This is a TWO PARTY system and the math will keep it so forever and ever.

If the Presidential election was like Georgia's election laws it MIGHT work (nobody wins until they top 50% in the General or a Runoff). But with the Electoral College being the rule of the land (and rightly so), no THIRD PARTY candidate is ever going to do ANYTHING other than take votes away from someone else, but never enough to pick up a SINGLE EC vote.

If you want more political BULLSHIT... keep up all that THIRD PARTY talk.

Finally, if AOC, Tlaib, Pressley and Omar can do what they have done to the Democrat party, the same can be done for the Republican party. FIX the party. You are not going to replace it. The math and EC will never let that happen.

I'll tell you how...

The Third Party Candidacy of Ross Perot.

If Ross Perot had NOT run in 1992, if someone said Clinton in 2020 we would think of GEORGE Clinton, the musician.

Careful with that third party idea, Eugene.

I know I am going to get flamed hard for this, but here it goes anyway. A couple of things for starters...

1. Lawsuits need a plaintiff who can demonstrate that they have been harmed by the actions of another person or legal entity.

2. Supreme Court decisions set precedent for time immemorial. The Marbury v Madison and U.S. v Schecter Poultry decisions of long ago still shape the law today. Roe v Wade will likely never be overturned outright because it became precedent once it was decided. Pains me to say it, but bad decisions are rarely overturned, though there are the Dred Scott decisions that eventually are overturned.

Now the reason why the SCOTUS did not take this case.

1. Standing. Texas was trying a novel way to show that the voters in THEIR state were harmed by the actions of another state. Even though Texas elections went off without much of a hitch, the idea that the Texas is harmed by the election in Pennsylvania was a serious legal stretch. Alito likely was a bit miffed that PA ignored his ruling on ballot date handling and Thomas is just ready for a good fight, but the rest of the court simply could not make the connection to the point that the suit could go forth.

2. Merits of the case. No mention made of the merits of the case. This is important. The issue was WHO the plaintiff was, not what the complaint was.

3. Precedent. This, I think, is the biggy. We have seen how the left screwed themselves when they reduced the number of senate votes required for the procedure of confirming judges. What THEY did for THEIR purposes bit them on the ass in Trump's first term. Their short-sightedness set Trump up for unprecedented successes in the area of judicial appointments. Had, the SCOTUS set the precedent that the Texas 'end around' play was legitimate legal theory, take off your partisan hats and imagine a world in which New York, California, Washington St., and Massachusetts have LEGAL PRECEDENT to go after Ohio, Missouri, Texas, and Florida based upon the same reasoning that would have allowed Texas to go after PA. Munch on that for a while.

So, the answer is simple. The SCOTUS needs a plaintiff from INSIDE the states whose vote WAS diluted through voter fraud. THOSE are the people who were harmed. Gore v Bush applies directly to the forehead of that problem.

The Texas v Pennsylvania case was brought PRIMARILY because it WAS a way to hop over all state and lower Federal courts since it involved an issue between states. That was MAIN REASON this was tried. State v State ALWAYS goes to the SCOTUS for adjudication.

It was a novel idea. But it could have set a really nasty precedent for future generations to have to deal with for decades or even centuries to come.

Cliff notes...

1. SCOTUS rejected the case because Texas could not adequately prove that Pennsylvania fraud hurt their state.

2. SCOTUS made no determination on the MERITS of the case.

3. Had they TAKEN this case, say hello to a real can of worms in every Federal election as far as the eye can see.

If you are so pissed that you will not vote for the better choices in these two Senate races...

Then just go ALL the way and REALLY make a statement by voting for Warnock and Pajama Boy Ossoff.

Why be a pussy and stay home when you can show the world just how PRINCIPLED you are by voting for the Democrats...

Right?

Or does that logic now look blatantly stupid to you when put in that context?

That's all one can do and that is all one can be expected to do.

For me, that means voting for David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler as Ossoff and Warnock cannot be allowed to be elected.

That is, for me, the next right thing.