All of this statistical evidence. All of the anomalies that, to a statistician or a pattern analysis expert are seen as 99.99% evidence of fraud and wrongdoing... You KNOW how LONG the list is...
And I cannot for the life of me see how any of it changes anything.
We are left wrangling over legal issues with state constitutions while the PROOF has no court that will hear the statistical evidence.
That's the way this feels to me.
Someone tell me what COURT you go to with statistical anomalies.
EOM
Floyd County GOP chairman Luke Martin pondered if the same error could possibly be found in other larger jurisdictions such as Fulton County, home to the highly-populated Democrat stronghold of Atlanta.
“It is scary that this happened in Floyd County. Imagine what the numbers could look like in places like Fulton County,” Martin reportedly stated.
“It appears that our elections office did not misplace any ballots, rather it appears as if this is a computer software mishap with the Dominion system.”
The witness described an election in which there were not enough votes being harvested for the candidate who was supposed to win so... the decision was made to SHUT THE SYSTEM DOWN - STOP THE COUNTING - and in about TWO HOURS the system had been recalibrated to change enough votes to secure the election.
Powell then said that this witness stated that he/she saw the same patterns in OUR election.
typo in title - HAS a witness
I think all of this finds its nexus in the Georgia recount.
The Edison data stream shows a switching of votes from Trump to Biden (net swap, as in all states that have the switches the votes move all over the place, purportedly to try to achieve a fixed ratio). In fact, the total votes that an HONEST recount (no need for signatures for THIS) of all ballots run through the machines should reveal that Trump had about 3000 more votes than Biden.
About that recount...
-
Raffensberger has stated that he does not think the recount will result in much of a difference. I do not trust him, but that statement could take the guard down for those who are counting the votes. They might just want to get it over with and the easiest way to do that is... to just count the votes.
-
Votes are being counted at tables with TWO counters at each table. In order for fraud to take place at this point, two strangers would need to somehow agree to cheat. I can easily imagine cheating if there were individual counters. Not so much with pairs. Is there a party affiliation with the pairs? Should be, but I do not know.
-
IF the recount is accurate (accurate for the counting of ballots cast even inclusive of fraudulent votes) AND the Edison tabulation data 'glitches' in Georgia behave as they did in Antrim County (6000 votes switched - only caught because the final tally seemed suspicious)... then
A flipping of Georgia from blue to red SHOULD be the death knell for Dominion's nefarious scheme to rob the American people of a second Trump term.
If you pray... pray that the recount is fair and accurate.
Let him know how you feel...
Please keep posting these so they remain front and center...
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
I am deeply hoping that Georgia has a similar experience. The Edison stream of data DID show the switch of about 6000 votes in Antrim County. It was there and the hand recount confirmed that the tabulation was incorrect.
The same set of data for Georgia showed about 17K+ votes switched from Trump to Biden.
If the same thing took place in GA, an honest hand recount should show it.
I am hoping those doing the recounting feel no compunction to alter anything. And it is interesting to hear Raffensberger state that he expects nothing to change. That COULD be a small amount of gamesmanship.
From a story about the recount...
'...As with any new process there were some questions and e are aware of one county who mistakenly though they could hand sort and then use machines to then count the sorted stacks. That is incorrect and not allowed in this process. They will have to recount those batches by hand.'
Of course they are going to say that. Then, when they prove to be anything BUT flawless, they will blame it on hackers.
Ask yourself this question... what else COULD they say at this point?
- Our machines are faulty
- Our machines are not secure
- Our machines can be easily programmed to weight votes differently
No. They are going to say that they are perfect. Then blame the failure on someone else.