7
jjacksonRIAB 7 points ago +7 / -0

The days of lynching never went away, it's just that it's blacks who are going around lynching people. All the BLM stuff, those are lynch mobs.

2
jjacksonRIAB 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't give a fuck about asians because they go on about muh hate crimes against asians but are mostly right on board with the anti-white bigotry. Fuck asians, fuck non-whites. If you hate white people, I hope you get killed by your fellow haters.

1
jjacksonRIAB 1 point ago +1 / -0

Again, just because you disagree with the criteria for choosing who to promote doesn't mean there are no ranks or that the system is communist. Everyone who is part of a hierarchical organization would organize it differently given the choice. Are you arguing that when you went from enlisted to officer you don't think you earned the rank?

Of course everyone thinks they deserve the rank they made it to. It's always the other guy who doesn't deserve it... and that is more often than not because they are vying for that guy's position.

1
jjacksonRIAB 1 point ago +1 / -0

Merit also means inequality - meaning the people at the bottom don't get to decide who has merit. Just because you disagree with a boxing judge's decision on who won the match doesn't mean that the winner wasn't chosen in a meritocratic process. It just means you're sore that you didn't earn the right to judge the match yourself.

1
jjacksonRIAB 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, that's communism by design. I see the problem here - no one even knows what fucking communism is. That's why they can't decide whether X is communist or fascist. Communism as described by Marx is mob rule, groupthink, pure democracy and statelessness. This, of course, never happens because humans are hierarchical animals. Communists are idealistic, utopian retards.

Just because I'm describing someone's blueprint for a skyscraper made of cotton candy doesn't mean I think the building will hold up.

-3
jjacksonRIAB -3 points ago +4 / -7

Yes it is. There are ranks. The "they" you are talking about are people who outrank you... because they have higher merit. Whether they deserve that rank is of course another question, but your argument proves my point. It's not communist because the military doesn't get to decide collectively who has merit and who doesn't. The people at the bottom will always argue the people at the top don't deserve it. That doesn't mean it's not meritocratic - it just means you don't agree with their decisions.

-1
jjacksonRIAB -1 points ago +4 / -5

Read the second paragraph of my post. It's not communist by design. It's not classless (there are ranks), it's not stateless (it IS the state), it's not money-less, there is no common ownership of the means of production, there is no voting. The military exalts the nation or national interest above the individual, it has rigid hierarchy and classes are paid according to their rank - so there is economic and social regimentation - and it forcibly suppresses its opposition. That's the definition of fascism and that's also the design of the military. It's designed to be fascist and it never becomes communist. The reason people are confused about this is because Communism as described by Marx never materializes and never will. I'm not saying communism has never been tried, I'm saying communism has been tried many times and every attempt failed, leading to a dictatorial state and millions of dead people.

28
jjacksonRIAB 28 points ago +29 / -1

The military isn't communist, it's fascist. There is a strict meritocratic hierarchy of ranks, there is no forced equality, the society isn't flat, there is no "pure democracy" or voting on everything, there is no redistribution of wealth - the workers aren't overthrowing senior officers.

The only thing I can think of that it has in common with communism relates to communism in practice - that is, when the great communist society fails to materialize they turn into authoritarian states. OK, so it's authoritarian. But the design is not communist, it's fascist.

2
jjacksonRIAB 2 points ago +2 / -0

Didn't downmod you btw. They should not be allowed to "learn to code". IMO. The advantages of modern society should only be given to people in modern society. These people need to stay in their countries and fix them before they are allowed to upgrade; otherwise we're preventing their own countries from improving.

2
jjacksonRIAB 2 points ago +3 / -1

There's plenty of "productive" work in the country they came from. We don't get productive people from those countries, we get lazy coward leeches.

2
jjacksonRIAB 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fortunately PGP is now built into Thunderbird so you no longer need an add-on. People should use it.

1
jjacksonRIAB 1 point ago +1 / -0

Deuteronomy 22:5: The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God.

Women were allowed to get away with gender-bending and the rest folllowed.

-1
jjacksonRIAB -1 points ago +1 / -2

Agreed, but it would have never happened if we hadn't allowed women to crossdress first - which pretty much put them on the side of men crossdressing, spreading gender confusion. Women as the original crossdressers need to get back in dresses and men back in pants.

2
jjacksonRIAB 2 points ago +2 / -0

Of course he did - because they're not actaully having an "debate" with you. Leftists are criminals. You have to recalibrate your expectations and realize you're not dealing with righteous people, but crooks pretending to be righteous and attempting to reverse morality on you, to demoralize you. Just like anyone who argues in favor of CP is probably a pedophile, anyone who argues in favor of theft and robbery likely feels guilty about his participation something related to theft and robbery. Don't let these people con you. They're not playing devil's advocate, they are the devil's henchmen. The best way to deal with them is not to argue in defense of yourself, but cut right to the chase - accuse them of being a thief and/or robber. Tell them loudly you had better not catch them stealing anything. Tell everyone you know that he's a crook and make him defend his retarded position to them.

5
jjacksonRIAB 5 points ago +5 / -0

These laws that allow recall are going to be ignored even if they pass because they are unconstitutional. It would probably be a better option to join the GOP and expel them from the party so that they no longer get GOP funding or downballot voters.

7
jjacksonRIAB 7 points ago +8 / -1

dirty history

lol, talk about cultural appropriation. White people ended slavery. China still practices it. They can whine about our "dirty history" all they want, but it's their dirty present.

14
jjacksonRIAB 14 points ago +15 / -1

Newsome is a governor, subject to recall. There are no recall provisions for Congresscritters in the Constitution.

3
jjacksonRIAB 3 points ago +3 / -0

Forget "proposals". If you propose anything you end up on a glow list. Everyone already knows what needs to be done but it seems everyone wants someone else to propose it first as if they're trying to entrap them. It's retarded.

2
jjacksonRIAB 2 points ago +3 / -1

I'll tell you exactly what I'm doing to do if this passes. Wait for them to show up.

First you talk about "no balls" and then say this stupid shit. If you just wait for them to show up, then you will be D&Ced against 50 men with guns and you'll lose.

1
jjacksonRIAB 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yep, they always tried to make Q and Trump a package deal even when Q repeatedly contradicted Trump. Until the end, they chose Q over Trump... and even now they choose Q. You cannot serve two masters.

2
jjacksonRIAB 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nah, look at OP's post and look at the downmods in here. It's always the Q people who have been divisive. They go around from thread to thread slamming people who do not worship their Oracle. They're not Trump supporters, they're Q supporters - and there is a difference.

1
jjacksonRIAB 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yep, the whole point of Q was to get in between Trump and his voters. They never supported Trump, they supported Q... and repeatedly and falsely claimed they were both the same thing. Even when Q contradicted Trump they chose Q. Q is their leader.

1
jjacksonRIAB 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nah, I'm not going to leave them alone. If you tried to bring a dose of reality to them on this sub, they'd hammer you with downvotes. The truth is they were the ones who were divisive. They'd come in here and try to enforce conformity to an oracle who they claimed spoke for Trump. They let Q get between us and Trump, they told us they were pro-Trump while at the same time telling us Q was the one with the master plan. This is and has always been a forum for Trump - not Q. There was never any kind of "package deal". There never was an oracle, Trump can speak for himself. A lot of the people who are pissed off at Trump right now are pissed because he didn't do what Q said he would do - as if Q is in charge and Trump is his minion. They should be pissed off at Q for successfully usurping Trump's authority.

view more: Next ›