It's not even about being stupid or smart. It's about what motivates women that makes them dangerous in a political context. The goal in the average woman's context is to accumulate resources to help raise her children and she typically accumulates them by selecting an appropriate husband. The problem is that socialism offers her an opportunity to accumulate those resources without a man in the picture using the violence that comes from the state without any kind of give and take that comes with a relationship. It's not in a woman's interest to worry about economics or how they weaken and compromise a nation to outside threats. She expects men to take care of those eventualities... so she will put stress on the system that she knows she'll never have to deal with. She has no skin in the game, she has that life support system that makes it easier for her to take great risks. Thus she chooses communism - especially when she's young and single.
Of course when she does find a husband she realizes that the state she enabled is now stripping her and her children of resources by taxing the family unit ...and she wants to roll it back.
IMO it's not about emotions or intelligence. Women are imo acting practically. If you had an army of men at your disposal, you'd probably do the same thing. But yeah, that's why I don't think women should vote - because when they do they try to Queen themselves irrespective of the fact that the proper role of government is not to grant wishes but to secure liberty; often at the cost of the deaths of men - and as far as I'm concerned that's a risk only men take and a cost men alone can fully appreciate.
=D
==D
===D
====D
=====D
B=====D
B======D~~~~~~ (0_0)<(if if if ...)
Change you can believe in
Melodramatic and self-absorbed. It was all about her. Why was I not surprised to learn she was an actress?
There's an extension called 4chanX that will let you enable threaded view if you would rather follow tree style comments.
If we can't get term limits for congress we need to change the Republican Party itself so they automatically kick out people who have completed their second term as a Senator, forcing them to run as an Independent.
Can't make the government do it? Force the party to do it.
We still have email, at least.
They knew Trump was making a legitimate request to investigate Biden's Ukrainian dealings and they stood by concealing exculpatory evidence while he was impeached. It appears all they're good at is covering up the crimes of prominent democrats by gathering evidence and sending it into the memoryhole.
FUCK THE FBI
I think the last part he was "cut off" was a repeat of the first part. It rolled over somewhere.
Goolag, Twatter and Facecuck have moved beyond mere businesses and are acting like fiefdoms unto themselves. Time to pull out the big dick of the law and slap them around a bit.
And morons like Sasse are the reason nothing got done when Republicans held everything. They're afraid of the left getting power, they're so cuckolded that people get tired of their inaction and vote them out - but they tell themselves the reason they were voted out was someone else's fault and not a consquence of their unwillingness to do any fucking thing at all that conservatives have demanded.
Once a cuck, always a cuck.
A recording is in the article itself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMEZzNZgDZQ
Kumalloverher Hairyass
The FBI from what I heard had this information since December - when the Democrats kicked off the impeachment.
THE FBI KNEW HE WAS INNOCENT
THEY HAD EVIDENCE HE WAS RIGHT TO ASK FOR AN INVESTIGATION
THEY SAID NOTHING
THEY DID NOTHING
THEY ASSISTED, BY INACTION, THE DEMOCRATS IN THEIR ATTEMPT TO OVERTHROW THE GOVERNMENT
TREASON
I know people feel compelled to point out shitlib hypocrisy but it's become a palliative at this point. Speaking plainly there are two types of people: those who fear shame and do right because it is right and those who are shameless and fear only consequences.
Democrats fall in the later category. Pointing out their hypocrisy accomplishes nothing because they're shameless. You have to nail them to the fucking wall, throw them in prison... and even then they won't get it, so keep them there until they do.
Koobuchar looks like an extra on Law & Order: SVU.
In retrospect it might have been a bottle filled with accelerant (gasoline, alcohol, etc) considering he was trying to start fires and was chasing Kyle for putting them out.
Yep, the LP is now the party of sore losers and it's full of disaffected shitlibs and neocons now. Worst fucking combination.
It really doesn't take a photographic memory to do this, all it takes is endeavoring to be internally consistent in one's reasoning - then you can easily go back and know what you said and didn't say.
Yep, or maybe "crooking the court" - bending it, reminds people of crooked.
I'd recommend against using the term "packing". Packing is a neutral word, it makes people think of moving things, filling up seats (i.e. packed seats in a stadium) - and I bet that's why it was chosen as a propaganda term - to make Roosevelt look like he wasn't an evil asshole.
When people hear stacking, they think "stacking the deck" - which is what they're doing... and stacking IS using dishonest tactics to win a game of chance. I think using the term stacking is a better term than packing.
That said, if you can think of anything better than that, name it now... because packing is not working. People are getting the wrong idea.
Maria kept sniffling throughout the interview too. Hope she's OK.
Do you know how the Antifa first came into being? They were liberals once, taken by the Soros money, tortured and mutilated. A ruined and terrible form of life. And now... perfected. My fighting Antifa. Whom do you serve?
Antifa: WEALTHY CORPORATIONS
Bioleninism. They've built a coalition of ephemeral, genetic rejects who should probably not be allowed to vote in the first place because they typically produce no progeny and have no stake in the future, so they vote for short term interests.