It's still there. I'm a registered voter in Michigan. I just used it. Go to https://mvic.sos.state.mi.us/Voter/

As long as Whitmer's tyranny comes crashing down, we all win.

"You may drive nature out with a pitchfork, but she will keep coming back." -Horace

It's satire. He's publicly trolling a woman from AEI who wrote a serious piece that made this argument. It shows you where the media is at - printing cheap satire and passing it off as serious argumentation.

This is well-meaning but stupid. It doesn't matter what the curriculum is. Personnel is policy. Until you remove the Marxist teachers and administrators then nothing will change.

That sure looks like a Short, Magazine, Lee-Enfield (SMLE) to me.

Here's the M1917: https://www.guns.com/news/2012/10/24/remington-m1917-enfield-rifle

Here's a piece on the SMLE: https://rifleman.org.uk/The_Rifle_Short_Magazine_Lee-Enfield.html

The muzzle configuration, protruding metal box magazine, and rear sight that's just too far forward are dead giveaways.

This is obvious sarcasm.

"Thank you for bringing up Susan Rice." Savage.

We need the "nasty woman" flair back.

The whole thing should be considered suspect. Look at who funded the researcher's work: the Bloomberg American Health Initiative.

Rockwell did a series on each of FDR's "Four Freedoms" "Freedom of Speech" is profoundly moving, which makes sense when you consider that it treats a God-given, unalienable natural right. This is neat, but conveys none of that profundity. What FDR was proposing when he proclaimed "Freedom from Want" was a transformation of the human condition, using the power of the state. Depicting that accurately was both elusive (as you can see in Rockwell's "Freedom from Want") and dangerous, because it would reveal FDR's Leviathan ambitions for the modern state.

Rockwell did a series on each of FDR's "Four Freedoms" "Freedom of Speech" is profoundly moving, which makes sense when you consider that it treats a God-given, unalienable natural right. This is neat, but conveys none of that profundity. What FDR was proposing when he proclaimed "Freedom from Want" was a transformation of the human condition, using the power of the state. Depicting that accurately was both elusive (as you can see in Rockwell's "Freedom from Want") and dangerous, because it would reveal FDR's Leviathan ambitions for the modern state.

Rockwell did a series on each of FDR's "Four Freedoms" "Freedom of Speech" is profoundly moving, which makes sense when you consider that it treats a God-given, unalienable natural right. This is neat, but conveys none of that profundity. What FDR was proposing when he proclaimed "Freedom from Want" was a transformation of the human condition, using the power of the state. Depicting that accurately was both elusive (as you can see in Rockwell's "Freedom from Want") and dangerous, because it would reveal FDR's Leviathan ambitions for the modern state.

Rockwell did a series on each of FDR's "Four Freedoms" "Freedom of Speech" is profoundly moving, which makes sense when you consider that it treats a God-given, unalienable natural right. This is neat, but conveys none of that profundity. What FDR was proposing when he proclaimed "Freedom from Want" was a transformation of the human condition, using the power of the state. Depicting that accurately was both elusive (as you can see in Rockwell's "Freedom from Want") and dangerous, because it would reveal FDR's Leviathan ambitions for the modern state.

Rockwell did a series on each of FDR's "Four Freedoms" "Freedom of Speech" is profoundly moving, which makes sense when you consider that it treats a God-given, unalienable natural right. This is neat, but conveys none of that profundity. What FDR was proposing when he proclaimed "Freedom from Want" was a transformation of the human condition, using the power of the state. Depicting that accurately was both elusive (as you can see in Rockwell's "Freedom from Want") and dangerous, because it would reveal FDR's Leviathan ambitions for the modern state.

Rockwell did a series on each of FDR's "Four Freedoms" "Freedom of Speech" is profoundly moving, which makes sense when you consider that it treats a God-given, unalienable natural right. This is neat, but conveys none of that profundity. What FDR was proposing when he proclaimed "Freedom from Want" was a transformation of the human condition, using the power of the state. Depicting that accurately was both elusive (as you can see in Rockwell's "Freedom from Want") and dangerous, because it would reveal FDR's Leviathan ambitions for the modern state.