2
JoeBob 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe... My belief is that most of the statements like that are actually written by Chinese trolls or people who do not have any stake in the game at all.

1
JoeBob 1 point ago +1 / -0

I basically agree. But, before Trump, we had the Uniparty. The Democrats and Republicans were effectively the same party. Both were pro-Globalization and anti-American.

2
JoeBob 2 points ago +2 / -0

Notice they didi that AFTER the primary. It would have helped her opponent if this news had come out sooner.

1
JoeBob 1 point ago +1 / -0

[email protected]#$... NO ONE is working against Biden. No one needs to.

1
JoeBob 1 point ago +3 / -2

I voted Libertarian last time and they were all so happy that they got 3%. I bet they totally bump this time.

I thought Trump was a Republican so I didn't vote for him... silly me.

5
JoeBob 5 points ago +5 / -0

God damn flip flopping politician. /s

2
JoeBob 2 points ago +2 / -0

To me, the stupidest part of this isn’t the basic concept. It is:

A) the debt and deficit would still increase because the Democrats would spend ALL that money plus more

B) it would not be one time and everyone knows that

1
JoeBob 1 point ago +1 / -0

Imagine the shit fit MSM would have if Trump did something like that.

On a different topic, is anyone challenging these actions? e.g. Houston now fines someone for not wearing a mask. Is that even legal?

2
JoeBob 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ya know what I just realized. “Rambling Joe Biden” is still smarter and more cognizant than the typical dildo Democrat. Seriously.

2
JoeBob 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe it is and maybe it isn't but just jacking your jaw isn't helping. Get of your ass, Thomas Bryant Cotton, and throw the bastards in jail.

by adb0001
9
JoeBob 9 points ago +10 / -1

(Reading and guessing a lot into what you said. I may be completely off base).

I would encourage you to voice your perspective at least to your mate and even at work perhaps just in a gentle "nahh..." response when they voice an idiotic idea. What I'm guessing you are actually feeling is not being true to yourself -- self censoring. Try hard to not do that and it will help with the anxiety.

I don't have a t.v. or streaming and I haven't since 1999. I watch a lot of YouTube types stuff on various sites, surf particular news sites, and The Donald.

Good luck! p.s. "Is anyone else struggling"? Yes. I'm batting 0% of my friends being awake. My brother is too including his children. I think many of us are struggling.

3
JoeBob 3 points ago +3 / -0

THAT'S my problem!!!!!

Thank YOU!!!

1
JoeBob 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ha! It won't be the first time I've been accused of misogyny.

1
JoeBob 1 point ago +1 / -0

Notice Mitch's expression. To me he is asking "Is that mother going to put up with this?!?!?!?"

4
JoeBob 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ehh... its not about soft or hard. Its about effective or ineffective. From my perspective, the Democrats treatment of Barr was negative. Of course, that's my perspective and a cuck will likely view it the opposite. But my belief is that a middle of the road person would view it as negative.

A better example is the abuse they gave Kavanaugh. If that didn't convince a lot of people that the Democrats are horrible people, then nothing will.

5
JoeBob 5 points ago +6 / -1

Actually... I'd bet $100 that any Marine drill sergeant could get 99% of the soy boys into fighting shape. They have weak inner souls which could be broken down within the first few hours and then be built back up in true Marine fashion.

1
JoeBob 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fellow Pedes ... I have yet to find one of my "friends" that doesn't believe 100% in all of those things. What the F should I do?

2
JoeBob 2 points ago +2 / -0

I saw the phrase "vote buying" in this article about mail-in voting and I had forgotten about this type of corruption.

Even if you assume the post office is 100% honest and delivers 100% of the ballots, "vote buying" is a very important concept that would be much more easily accessible with mail-in voting.

A large organization can be formed that would go to houses and pay people $1000 to vote a particular way. They would watch the voter fill out the form, sign it, and put it in an envelope and give it to the bad guy. The bad guy would then deliver it to the post office for counting. A significant component of this scheme is the time allowed for voting.

A group of 1000 bad guys could each visit four houses a day over a month and end up with 4 * 1000 * 30 = 120,000 votes. That's a lot of votes. The cost would be $120M which isn't beyond reason and that's if you pay $1000 per vote. Many would likely change their vote for $100.

With in person voting, this type of system is prevented because the individual voter is given a ballot, they go hide behind a screen, fill it out, and cast the vote.

I suppose with today's tech, the voter could photograph their ballot, show it to the bad guy, and get paid for their vote but it would be cumbersome. If the people at the polling station noticed lots of people photographing their ballots, they would get wise. I just don't think one could hope to get 120K votes with just 1000 bad guys. The bad guys are also very exposed to being caught paying voters for photos of their ballots.

0
JoeBob 0 points ago +1 / -1

Thank you! I learned something today and it resolves some of my dilemmas. I still need to chew on it some.

1
JoeBob 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wonder if Vegas has odds on Clinton (Bill in this case) seeing the inside of a prison cell.

Better yet... I wonder if Vegas has odds of the two Clintons being in the same prison at the same time?

1
JoeBob 1 point ago +1 / -0

The same is true for women only entities.

1
JoeBob 1 point ago +1 / -0

Folks... we all here know 100% for a fact that the debates since the League Of Women Voters stopped doing them are 100% a clown show. Yes... Biden being afraid of them is a topic worth pointing out but other than that, let it go. We've not had real debates for a VERY LONG TIME. It's a blessing that the clown show is being removed.

1
JoeBob 1 point ago +2 / -1

You use the word "majority" and its not clear to me how the majority felt or what the majority actually did. For that matter, has the majority even heard of George Floyd? Seriously. You would be amazed at how little people actually listen to the "news" and current events. They have diapers to change and jobs to do.

What, to me, the George Floyd incident proves is the "elite" or the "Democrats" or whoever you want to label / blame for this will stop at NOTHING to get what they want. I hate when everything is compared to Hitler or Stalin but these people knew the entire time that there was other evidence. I first heard about these tapes the first night it happened.

And its not just George Floyd. If HCQ had been used as they KNEW it should have been used, 100K people in the US would be alive today. The globe number of deaths is approaching 700K. And that isn't counting the deaths due to the lock down and the economic destruction caused by the lock down. This has been destruction that is comparable to World War 1.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›