Unfortunately "genetic regression to the mean" is a real biological phenomenom
Even if you pick out the outlier, a very, very well-mannered, intelligent person, your children are going to get genes that are closer to the average of the population / race, than the genetic-lottery-winning outlier
That is why you ALWAYS have to consider populations, relatives, "race" and other things, in addition to the "individual"
The same goes with every single feature or trait. For example, professional athletes and olympians do not produce only olympians. That is because of genetic regression to the mean. The individual traits of a professional athlete might be caused by in a large part by genes, but are not nearly as much heretidary. The top individuals are just a product of genetic lottery. For example, Jordan's kids are not good, at all, in basketball. Gretzky's kids didn't succeed in hockey.
If there won't be enough people from the 300+ million in the US to fight in a war, maybe
-there is something wrong about the war
or
-maybe there is something wrong about who you are supposed to be fighting for
If Joe Biden decides to go to do some more Obama etc wars, can you blame anyone if they don't want anything to do with it?
If Joe Biden's wars are so fucking great, maybe the "Biden voters" should go & fight them? (First you would of course have to find the voters)
If Donald Trump was the President, and asked people to enlist to the military to - for example - defend the US-Mexican border, I think a large portion of even the users of this website would be ready to enlist - because you would more probably be fighting a good cause, for you, your family, your relatives, your country, your future.
If the war is just, logical, and for a good cause, there is not going to be a problem to find the soldiers. But if the agenda is to push Joe Biden's MSM / Big Tech / Big Pharma / military industry / oil industry agenda yet again to the Middle East, there might not be a lot of takers, and for a good reason
Only the small countries have any need for a draft.
Communists are much, much worse
Nobody wanted to be conquered by the Commies
They would have rather been with the Nazis
Somehow the Communist crimes don't seem to count, killing people of hunger seems to be JUST OK for the modern people. Maybe the Nazis should have just let the Jews die of famine, then that would have been 100% OK????
I do not get why 99% of the schools brainwash kids about Nazism - and mention nearly nothing about communism. An endless dia show of images is shown from the concentration camps and ghettos - but somehow no one gives a shit about the people killed by commies?
Yes, it might be a problem, but two problems are bigger:
-
The vote rigging: doesn't even really matter who votes, when you haveStalin/Democrats "counting" the votes
-
Bringing in gigantic amounts of illelegals: Biden is letting in 11 million in one day. Doesn't really matter how people vote, when he overwhelms any lead with that gigantic wave of illegals
Now that he has incentivized the illegals by making them legal, the wave of illegals will be just gigantic in the next years: they know that they will become "legal" as long as they just get in, no matter how
But the studies are clear: intelligence does correlate more with wealth than income
https://www.bcaresearch.com/images/Peter_PPT_presentation%206.pdf
I think it is a reference to owning land. You don't have to do anything to it
There was a reason why the democracies started with giving the vote to only the land-owning men
It was because intelligence does not correlate with "income" nearly as much as it correlates with "wealth"
Even some stupid people have OK income. But they never save up, and invest wisely. They almost always throw away all their money on useless shit
That is why the land-owners had the vote in the early democracies.
**You should immediatelly start the new party. **
Have representatives & senators change from Republicans & Democrats to the New Party wayyyyyy before the next elections - so that you gain more percentages in the polls than the Republican party way BEFORE the next elections, so that most people will know they will be voting between the New Party and the Democrats, and not between R & D like they used to
Well you need to get rid of the Republican Party
Start a new Party
No matter how much it might hurt the votes in the beginning, when votes are split between the new & old parties
Even if you only get 35% of the votes in the next election, do it. After you win the republicans the first time, you get more votes, because everyone will see they have to vote either democrats or the new party
You just have to commit even more fraud
Dump such gigantic amounts of "mail votes" to republican / Trump voting precints that the democrats are forced to make up better voting laws
Put up 99% voting percentages, with 99% of votes going to the new Trump party
Seth Rich?
The Clinton Body Count is probably very close to the Putin body count
Anyone disagreeing is pretty much just as likely to get killed in the US as is in Russia
Maybe ask Jeffrey Epstein?