**You should immediatelly start the new party. **
Have representatives & senators change from Republicans & Democrats to the New Party wayyyyyy before the next elections - so that you gain more percentages in the polls than the Republican party way BEFORE the next elections, so that most people will know they will be voting between the New Party and the Democrats, and not between R & D like they used to
Well you need to get rid of the Republican Party
Start a new Party
No matter how much it might hurt the votes in the beginning, when votes are split between the new & old parties
Even if you only get 35% of the votes in the next election, do it. After you win the republicans the first time, you get more votes, because everyone will see they have to vote either democrats or the new party
You just have to commit even more fraud
Dump such gigantic amounts of "mail votes" to republican / Trump voting precints that the democrats are forced to make up better voting laws
Put up 99% voting percentages, with 99% of votes going to the new Trump party
Even the Finnish MSM political "experts" from universities are wondering why the US MSM in trying to paint a picture of some unheard of coup, when they were even let in - and the past year had months of riots after riots.
The anti-vax numbers are huge here in Europe, that's why they are trying to force it down everybody's throat
Also the covid lie / mask lies are crumbling, people are wearing less and less masks, and worrying less and less about "covid"
For example, the MSM here in Finland started a propaganda campaign because the ski resorts were fucking packed between christmas / new year, and multiple people in the interviews basically told the media & the government to shove it up their asses
Also the largest internet forum here (a finnish 4chan) is very, very anti-vax/covid/mask, because it is one of the places where there is freedom of speech (the msm is censored propaganda, of course)
The MSM is also very scared, they even put up a propaganda campaign against a small town gymnastics club coach, when the town decided to give her the award as "the coach of the year" - and someone revealed she was anti-vax. They were targeting her, the town, and the club on the state media frontpages, trying to get them to fire her. They even tried the age old trick of blaming her of being "anti-semitic" on top of being "anti-vaccination". (Her crime was questioning on some social media post whether or not exactly 6 million jews had died)
The propaganda is getting so ridiculous that they clearly are scared
But, fortunately, there are still some medias reporting on the vaccination deaths from around the world.
The Authoritarian basic argument against Democracy is that Democracy, by its nature, is:
-weak, you have rules to prevent you from strongly going against the enemies of the state
-open to fraud / foreign influences, because everyone gets to do things, everyone has "freedoms", and thus it is easier for spies / foreign propagandists to spoil the system
This is true especially in the time of the Internet, because the democracies let every single russian / chinese / foreign actor into their networks / their internet. Try to go to the North Korea Internet. Probably won't get in. Try to go and post shit on chinese forums. You will pretty quickly get thrown out, if you even get in
In China, if you try to cheat the system, you hang, get shot or get to go the labor camp for the rest of your life. No trials, you just vanish. In the Western democracies, you can cheat and piss on the country, the government and the people decade after decade, and get money from it.
For example, in China, someone decide to make some money and put plastic shit in milk. They were hanged. You might get a few years in prison in the Western countries for that, after years of litigation.
" he belongs on a helicopter ride"
**Careful! He likes his islamic terrorists, but if a non-muslim even says something like that, it's not gonna be part and parcel of His City, and you're gonna end up in jail for years. **
Everyone who had read the Science News knew immediatelly he was right
Before his "UV-light and desinfectant" speech there had just been news on scientists proposing old UV-radiation techniques to kill the Corona virus, by either radiating the blood, or putting a light inside the lungs
And there had been a new test on spraying alcohol vapor into your lungs, desinfecting the lungs of bacteria, viruses etc
Both were very serious propositions, but the MSM of course lied & told people Trump was a madman, completely out of his mind, proposing complete BS treatments.
The largest RCT in history, published October 13, 2020
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0240287
" By intention-to-treat analysis, facemask use did not seem to be effective against laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infections (odds ratio [OR], 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9 to 2.1, p = 0.18) nor against clinical respiratory infection (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.4, p = 0.40). Similarly, in a per-protocol analysis, facemask use did not seem to be effective against laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infections (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.9–1.7, p = 0.26) nor against clinical respiratory infection (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0–1.8, p = 0.06)."
RR is slightly over 1 for masks = made the situation worse
Cochrane Review, 20 November 2020 https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub5/epdf/standard "wearing a mask may make little or no difference to the outcome of influenza like illness (ILI) compared to not wearing a mask (risk ratio (RR) 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82 to 1.18"
(The October RCT didn't make it in time for that on. Now the RR is 0,99 = no effect for masks, and if you would add the new study, it would be 1 or slightly over)
On Cochrane Reviews:
"Cochrane Reviews are recognized internationally as representing a gold standard for high-quality, trusted information, and are published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, one of the databases within the Cochrane Library"
"Several studies provide empirical evidence that Cochrane reviews tend to be of higher quality, were less vulnerable to bias, acknowledged more limitations, and were generally more conservative in how the results were endorsed than non-Cochrane reviews"
The retard frog is a version of Pepe, and it's called "Apu apustaja", basically meaninn "helpy helper", referring to a personal assistant for the retarded / disabled
That's because the retard frog -meme was started in the Finnish image forums, when some moron started to pretend to be a retarded person living in his own flat, who has a personal, government-paid assistant who comes by every day to bring him food. Aka help him. And the moron pretended to write like a retard, twisting all the words, like saying "helpy helper" in stead of "personal assistant"
He started every one of his retarded rants with the text "today, helpy helper brought me food items X, Y, Z ..." and told what he liked / didn't like. And ranted how the helper - yet again - didn't bring him soda & candy like he asked
And because he started every message like that in finnish, every message had the frase "apu apustaja", and that's how the retarded frog got his name
Unfortunately even those people still have the right to vote.
And those kind of people decide the elections.
Yes, maybe they are dumb or naiive, but you still need them to win the elections.
The MSM and the democrats have zero problems to brainwash even the mentally retarded / demented to vote. Heck, they'll even vote for them in the nursing homes.
In Finland, these kinds of "hit-lists" are called "illegal registries", and you get prosecuted for having them