proof is proof. what you're talking about is strong evidence, or commencement of proof.
is it extremely sketchy? yes
is it very likely to be fraud? yes
could it have another explanation that wouldn't be fraud? also yes
for the record, my understanding of what he said about it, long story short, is that yes it smells fishy, yes it's extremely highly sketchy, yes there's probably fire behind the smoke, but no it doesn't formally prove anything.
i agree.
what he didn't mention though is, why do the two ladies clearly appear to be counting the same ballots multiple times. that part is missing from his analysis. and I happen to think it's the most important part.
well yeah, I mean... I agree but even that is still quite theoretical.
the real, concrete message is: anyone can fuck with the constitution any time he wants in any future elections, AS LONG AS his trickery makes his party win.
For the record, the piece I'm referring to about Scott talking about LGBTQI+ is him talking about Ellen Page "becoming" a "man".
So he was talking flat out transgenderism, and was approving not only implicitly but very vocally.
I'm a bit sick of having to justify that "I have nothing against gays" every. single. time. I raise the LGBTQI+ issue. I believe that kind of distinction should be understood by us at this point, right?
Really cool and hilarious.
Jokes asides, some people don't seem to realise the magnitude of the statement SCOTUS would be making if they were to rule #2 or #3.
This would be essentially them saying, to all future perpetrators of unlawful or unconstitutional acts of any kind in future elections:
do what you please, if that makes you win we won't intervene
SCOTUS saying #2 or #3 would, in my understanding, literally break the country.
already big globalist suckers by this time — musically I actually prefer their 90's era, ironically — anything pre-1991 was just too simplistic, as in, always the same chorus melodies (yeah ok we got it, you can descent the major scale down to the root note), always the same chords and scales... gotta give'em credit for sound and energy though
i think most of their success is due to the incredible smartness of bono as a businessman, guy's a true genius, nothing to be said about that — doubled with a true motherfucker
u2 are the worst kind of globalist suckers that you can find. been sucking literally all dicks they could suck. musically you gotta give them some credit though, and I'm positively amazed at how they have kept going their shows for 40 years. i still haven't heard them on the 2020 election.
Thing I don't get is... they've always been doing that anyway to an extent. Why not simply silently remove these videos instead of bragging about it on their blog?
They've communicated on this for a deliberate reason, that is independent from actually censoring the videos.
I used to think it was not a big deal to not wear a seatbelt. until i had my first (and only) accident. then I realized that it's absolutely worth it.
not trying to influence you, but just consider it the following way: yes, if you crash at 120mph into a tree, you will die, seatbelt or not. seatbelts are not made for these. they are made for the 95% of accidents which are really minor IF YOU HAPPEN TO WEAR A SEATBELT.
another way to say it:
- 95% of accidents are minor with a seatbelt on
- if you remove the seatbelt, 80% of these become fatal
EU “battled” GMO very effectively mostly because US companies lobbying so that EU agriculture can’t compete with US. GMOs are evil yes, but once a country uses them then it has a definitive competitive advantage and has interest in other countries not using them.
haha let me share with you a funny moment I just had.
I read this post's headline on TDW and was actually thinking "hey it's probably a kid or a newbie asking this" then I click and.... oh shit!
no disrespect for GEOTUS, I know why he's doing that, but just thought it's funny how sometimes he can effectively (on purpose) talk like a 5-years old