Well is it the perfect match?
Because if it is the perfect match then it wouldn't matter would it? They're literally the perfect match, there'd be no reason to not love them if they're literally perfect for me.
I don't exactly know what else you want from me. All evolution is, is genetic changes in populations over time through natural selection. I don't know what you think evolution is but whatever you're talking about isn't evolution.
And as for the computers, yes they do what we tell them to. But the model and principles for that type of learning are based on evolution. It's called reinforcement learning.
No it's not "things" it's genetic changes over generations. There's only two basic premises that you have to accept as true.
- That living things pass on their genetic information to their offspring.
- The living things that have advantageous genes will pass on their genetic information more successfully.
That's literally it. That's the whole thing, the timescale is irrelevant.
COMMUNISM DETECTED ON AMERICAN SOIL, LETHAL FORCE ENGAGED
-Liberty prime, fallout.
I'd hope that God would be a little less petty than to throw me into a burning lake because I didn't believe in the correct version of him.
Well is this hypothetical partner literally the perfect match?
And they use the same basic principles as evolution, adaptation through selective reproduction. That data is collected with individual agents that are run in batches with the most successful being able to continue through mixing the traits while the failures are thrown away.
It runs 1000s of simulations of the same circumstances and picks the most correct response until you eventually you have an A.I that's very efficient at doing the task it's been assigned to do. By mixing the "DNA" (in this case, the coding) of the individual agents that have the most desirable results. Depending on the task assigned it can take millions of iterations, literal centuries of processing power. The Deep mind algorithm that was built to play league of legends in a 1v1 setting has about 100 years of game experience.
We've been using these exact same principles for thousands of years, with crops livestock and domesticated animals like dogs and cats. Just instead of selection from natural environmental hazards we did the selecting instead, in the case of those crops and animals. Changes in populations can happen over as little as a few centuries such as in the case of peppered moths.
But regardless, changes in a population through selective pressure exists. The time scale doesn't matter. It's just a basic thing that is, things change over time.
Well no, It's just incremental.
Some basic examples are things like crops and farm animals. Carrots, cows, bananas ect. And how humans have changed them to benefit us.
Some other things to look at are how they're designing A.I with neural nets as it's a similar premise of incremental improvement over generations.
Never had a relationship and I likely never will.
That's not how it works my dude.
Same shit happens over here in the UK.
Man stabs someone
BBC: A "British" man has been arrested for stabbing someone shows picture of white man
muslim gets arrested for being caught making bombs (happened like last week)
BBC: A man has been arrested for making bombs shows no picture
It's fucked up.
The evidence for my "limited soul" theory continues to mount.
Out of my very limited knowledge of WW2, didn't the food shipments to the Indian soldiers keep getting sunk by U boats? So he made the calculated decision to stop sending food and send it somewhere it wouldn't end up at the bottom of the ocean.
They also found the little shack it was hidden in lol.
Firing a taser at someone is putting their life in danger.
He over powered two officers and stole a weapon, if he tased one of the officers he could have overpowered the lone officer and killed them both.
If he actually hit the shot from the taser the other officer would have pulled their firearm and shot him.
They already used the shot from one of the two tasers and the perp took the other one so all that's left is the guns.
Also have you ever seen a ranged taser probe? It's a fucking razor sharp harpoon.
It's absolutely a lethal weapon, it's just less lethal than a gun.
Some people shrug tasers off while others drop dead, they are not reliable.
If you're trying to harm the officers...they owe you nothing. Attack someone and get shot, attack officers and get shot.
Attacking people is not a behavior that should be tolerated, don't attack people.
They're literally the same thing.
I used to be part of that crowd, the "just shoot him in the leg" retards until I learned more about guns and started to understand just how hard it is to actually aim a handgun even with perfect conditions.
Pokemon movie the real OG.
Drunk driving is illegal, so don't fucking do it. End of story.
Sounds like a bullshit law to me.
How about people don't steal police officers weapons? Attack the police, get shot.
I wouldn't really call that "just"