barnes & viva podcasts covered the legality, it's not really established either way. The VP gets to count the electoral votes and in the past that power ( pre 1900 past ) has been used to toss electors from one side giving the other the win.
I'm in the same camp as robert barnes on this now. This kind of shit is a deliberately targeted operation to get people to sit down and relax and not take any action.
Action gets results, and sitting there thinking there's a magical plan that'll achieve the whole thing for you gets you complacent and inactive.
my 2c.
also plausible that the follow may have happened when the account wasn't used for these purposes? ( hers that is ). I don't use twitter so I don't know if crenshaw is the type of person to follow anybody he meets or a select few.
ok I'm kinda in camp bullshit on this but I also hope to be wrong.
Just one question on the sting angle, why wait any longer to close the jaws?
24 hours after the election, sure the sting story was plausible. now though? What's the reason you wouldn't have snapped the jaws on the trap yet. If it was done within a week of the election people would all go along, now if you have great proof of everything you'll literally need to take over CNN in order for that truth to be told.
Ok that changes the story here.
I just watched the linked video again and I don't see what other people are saying here, so I was wondering if there were pieces I didn't have or if everyone was seeing soemthing I was not.
I'm taking a guess here when I say this so forgive me if I'm wrong. I think you're assuming some malice on her part? If there was some nefarious malice it would seem likely she wouldn't have shown us the ballots without return addresses which invalidates those ballots ( thanks lady! ).
What about the alternate explanation that this is just someone doing their job, thinking it's all above board, and not realizing they're actually displaying something that is not above board at all.
Also I think error correct gotcha there and you meant traitor...
Again, I'm still reserving judgment, and if you check my post history you'll see I said I want people who KNOWINGLY advocated against HCQ and lied to the public for power, money, fear, and control; to hang by the neck until dead. That doesn't include some downstream doctor who's going off what they were told and doesn't know any better.
That says 1999. I don't believe in a path to citizenship for everyone but I do believe in a path to redemption. 20 years ago this person was booked for having a controlled substance. Was it some weed in the hands of a then ~20 year old?
IMO Saying someone is trash based on something 20 years ago and nothing else is a bullshit standard I don't want applied to myself.
I reserve the right to pass judgment later if we find out it was a reefer full of cocaine and child sex slaves, but lets be honest it probably wasn't much given that thing says zero time served and released the next day.
I think this is a good point to re-iterate what the constitutional lawyer was talking about yesterday in the GA hearing.
Proving fraud is entirely not required. Proving the proper procedure was not followed is enough to invalidate an election, or call into question the ballots handled without proper chain of custody.
Put in other words stolen from Scott adams. If I leave my bank vault open every night, doors open, and no alarm on. Do I REALLY need to count the money in the vault to know some or all is missing? When a proper chain of custody is broken the reasoning flips, I don't have to prove fraud has been committed because you can't prove the process has been followed.
Suppose there was some honest mistake and half valid explanation for ushering everyone out and pulling ballots from under the table ( although lets be honest that looks veeeeeery suspicious ). Merely counting without proper observers there breaks the proper process. as pointed out in the hearing, small breaks in proper process affecting a lot less ballots than those counting machines chugged through have invalidated elections before.
As to a lot of people on the ground? Yeah I'd bet most of them just thought this was normal and were doing as instructed.
having almost watched the whole thing I don't think it was hammered into this woman hard enough that fraud proof is not the required standard.
Merely displaying that the proper procedures were not followed is the minimum required bar. Proving fraud on top of that is gravy.
This being from my understanding from the professor who spoke.
Call it both. It looks like both now.
Would you not consider sending some to the gallows for any of those reasons though? Particularly in the case where it can be proved they knew in advance and did so for power, control, and monetary gain.
peak prosperity youtube channel was doing daily videos earlier in the year covering papers for those who want to go back and watch the actual receipts.
All the tests on HCQ were bullshit. Toxic level doses, omitting necessary things like zinc, or giving no tests to check the zinc level in a patient. Giving it when people were almost already dead from being on a respirator.
There was a deliberate attempt to smear this old drug ( based off quinine which predates penicillin ) as suddenly being extremely dangerous.
I recall one of the peak prosperity videos literally doing searches for papers written before 2020 on HCQ lethality or side effects / etc. NADA. Early 2020? A flurry of papers saying it's so deadly you can't even take it as a prophylactic ( taking before getting something ).
I have zero doubt this was a deliberate move to knock out cheap drugs in favor of billion + dollar treatments and vaccines. I would like to see people hang for this.
retarded? no. Nefarious? Yes.
If this happens there will quickly be no manufacturers of guns. Can you ban them directly? Nope, not easily. Can you regulate them out of the price range most people can handle? Oh yeah you betcha.
oh i have no doubt each printer for particular states had smaller scale watermarks on them. However a Blockchain solution where each ballot was identifiable did not happen.
Imo this isn't some 90D chess on behalf of these types, especially with what he said next. That the national guard was on their way to secure the ballots and that this was all some big sting so you could all sit down and rest assured you need take no action.
That last part there. Take no action. That's what I think a lot of the fanciful bullshit is for. It was people making calls in PA that got that hearing that has them now trying to claw back vote certification. Action made results.
I was about to decry Bullshit assuming this was the QFS blockchain larp again but it is not. They just did a shit job printing out fake ballots.
Realistically if there's any quantity of them it should be easy to prove they are fakes by looking at the chain of custody from the original printers. If we ordered 1 million ballots, and we have 100k unused ones but 1.4 million votes then we have some extra ballot ingression....
Agree to all of that. It's just that if there was any 'hole' in Trumps work it wouldn't have been getting people jobs, he did that quite well prior to the wuflu and even well into that process with the turnaround happening 'faster than the experts predict'.
To a lot of people America first and rebuilding the nation was the only grand image they needed. That being said to the commies it was easy to try and rebrand that as some kind of huwaiiiet supremacy! It would have been harder in my opinion to do the same with some kind of space race.
This is all cherry picking though realistically, it's easy to sit on the sidelines and imagine how some extra thing could have helped...
The coups weren't about ousting him, they were about throwing so much shit at him he couldn't maneuver. Look at what they did with mcarthy, they just kept him occupied by constant investigations.