... the bit about KSP 2 hurts me,.. how many times must that game be delayed?!

The coups weren't about ousting him, they were about throwing so much shit at him he couldn't maneuver. Look at what they did with mcarthy, they just kept him occupied by constant investigations.

barnes & viva podcasts covered the legality, it's not really established either way. The VP gets to count the electoral votes and in the past that power ( pre 1900 past ) has been used to toss electors from one side giving the other the win.

I'm in the same camp as robert barnes on this now. This kind of shit is a deliberately targeted operation to get people to sit down and relax and not take any action.

Action gets results, and sitting there thinking there's a magical plan that'll achieve the whole thing for you gets you complacent and inactive.

my 2c.

did she do that to troll or does she believe that completely?

If we're talking podcasts I'd like to suggest viva & barnes sunday livestream specifically because Barnes rags on Q quite hard.

The tl;dr there being Q looks like a deliberately run psy-op against freedom lovers to get them complacent and make them believe things that aren't true.

I recall this 'study' coming up years ago only to be touted around by all the lefties. A short time later a correction was made that they'd done some of their math wrong and the result was actually the opposite ( aka by their own figuring it was lefties who were psychotic ).

of course for years after I still had lefty types sending me the original pre revised headlines...

Suppose that's real ( I'm remaining somewhat skeptical until more actual proof ). That still wouldn't include the votes being "adjudicated" locally, or any discarded ballots.

did trump gain 5250 votes while all the other candidates votes remained the same, or was there a conspicuous drop of 5250 votes for biden at the same time?

it was also the gateway for replacing that fat with a load of sugar.

also plausible that the follow may have happened when the account wasn't used for these purposes? ( hers that is ). I don't use twitter so I don't know if crenshaw is the type of person to follow anybody he meets or a select few.

I made an entire shirt when i was in my teens and gave it away. It was a long process.

My 16th birthday present was a few miles of 14 gauge galvanized wire...

ok I'm kinda in camp bullshit on this but I also hope to be wrong.

Just one question on the sting angle, why wait any longer to close the jaws?

24 hours after the election, sure the sting story was plausible. now though? What's the reason you wouldn't have snapped the jaws on the trap yet. If it was done within a week of the election people would all go along, now if you have great proof of everything you'll literally need to take over CNN in order for that truth to be told.

lets be honest, this is another one of those 'sources familiar with thinking' bs cnn articles. they wrote it up to stir up their base.

That or else there's some BGY compromise on him so he can't make moves without having those moves be tarnished.

(that's just theorycrafting some nice possibility)

get out of here stalker.

nods in approval

Ok that changes the story here.

I just watched the linked video again and I don't see what other people are saying here, so I was wondering if there were pieces I didn't have or if everyone was seeing soemthing I was not.

Have any idea how to get them shipped to Canada? Went to his website and picked out a king size pillow + pillow cases and it says there's no shipping to Canada...

fuckit, ima buy a new pillow.

I'm taking a guess here when I say this so forgive me if I'm wrong. I think you're assuming some malice on her part? If there was some nefarious malice it would seem likely she wouldn't have shown us the ballots without return addresses which invalidates those ballots ( thanks lady! ).

What about the alternate explanation that this is just someone doing their job, thinking it's all above board, and not realizing they're actually displaying something that is not above board at all.

Also I think error correct gotcha there and you meant traitor...

Again, I'm still reserving judgment, and if you check my post history you'll see I said I want people who KNOWINGLY advocated against HCQ and lied to the public for power, money, fear, and control; to hang by the neck until dead. That doesn't include some downstream doctor who's going off what they were told and doesn't know any better.

That says 1999. I don't believe in a path to citizenship for everyone but I do believe in a path to redemption. 20 years ago this person was booked for having a controlled substance. Was it some weed in the hands of a then ~20 year old?

IMO Saying someone is trash based on something 20 years ago and nothing else is a bullshit standard I don't want applied to myself.

I reserve the right to pass judgment later if we find out it was a reefer full of cocaine and child sex slaves, but lets be honest it probably wasn't much given that thing says zero time served and released the next day.

I think this is a good point to re-iterate what the constitutional lawyer was talking about yesterday in the GA hearing.

Proving fraud is entirely not required. Proving the proper procedure was not followed is enough to invalidate an election, or call into question the ballots handled without proper chain of custody.

Put in other words stolen from Scott adams. If I leave my bank vault open every night, doors open, and no alarm on. Do I REALLY need to count the money in the vault to know some or all is missing? When a proper chain of custody is broken the reasoning flips, I don't have to prove fraud has been committed because you can't prove the process has been followed.

Suppose there was some honest mistake and half valid explanation for ushering everyone out and pulling ballots from under the table ( although lets be honest that looks veeeeeery suspicious ). Merely counting without proper observers there breaks the proper process. as pointed out in the hearing, small breaks in proper process affecting a lot less ballots than those counting machines chugged through have invalidated elections before.

As to a lot of people on the ground? Yeah I'd bet most of them just thought this was normal and were doing as instructed.

having almost watched the whole thing I don't think it was hammered into this woman hard enough that fraud proof is not the required standard.

Merely displaying that the proper procedures were not followed is the minimum required bar. Proving fraud on top of that is gravy.

This being from my understanding from the professor who spoke.

Call it both. It looks like both now.

Would you not consider sending some to the gallows for any of those reasons though? Particularly in the case where it can be proved they knew in advance and did so for power, control, and monetary gain.

peak prosperity youtube channel was doing daily videos earlier in the year covering papers for those who want to go back and watch the actual receipts.

All the tests on HCQ were bullshit. Toxic level doses, omitting necessary things like zinc, or giving no tests to check the zinc level in a patient. Giving it when people were almost already dead from being on a respirator.

There was a deliberate attempt to smear this old drug ( based off quinine which predates penicillin ) as suddenly being extremely dangerous.

I recall one of the peak prosperity videos literally doing searches for papers written before 2020 on HCQ lethality or side effects / etc. NADA. Early 2020? A flurry of papers saying it's so deadly you can't even take it as a prophylactic ( taking before getting something ).

I have zero doubt this was a deliberate move to knock out cheap drugs in favor of billion + dollar treatments and vaccines. I would like to see people hang for this.