I'm not an atheist. I'm sick of the pussification of Christianity and everything else. That's mainly why the term "christcuck" exists, people who use christianity to push their faggotry on others.
rEspEcT wOmEn and pray
why is it always a christcuck, lol
these people will be dealt with in the system
no they wont.
So is no one going to talk about the fact that this tweet is the perfect example of why we're in this mess in the first place?
Women basically "run" the west insofar as it's possible for women to run things and the average relationship (like this one) is female-"led"...the result is that our collective discourse is so feminized it's considered acceptable to shut down the entire country and implement draconian measures in the name of safety...because of a fucking flu.
Western men are whipped beyond repair.
Based ladypede.
This is correct. Women tend to vote for more social programs and bigger government to fill the role of provider/protector/moral leader. The problem is exacerbated with single women who are directly "replacing" men with government. (Of course, men still foot the bill.)
This, combined with the absolutely retarded divorce, alimony and child custody laws mean that men increasingly get nothing in return for filling the role of provider. The end result is that men drop out, birth rates plummet, and, for a little while, society labors under the delusion that it can maintain itself with a workforce, government and military increasingly made up of women.
After that comes the crash.
Exactly correct, but this isn't going to be accomplished without a major overhaul of the entire system. Unlimited democracy and the 19th amendment is one of their sacred cows, they will bring down the United States as we know it before letting that happen. I think there are more people than we realize that agree with us but unfortunately the majority, even in conservative circles, is conditioned to repudiate this kind of thought process.
Realistically, nothing like that is going to happen till we are completely broken down as a nation and a new society or societies rise from the ashes. Meantime we are along for the ride.
Upvote :)
tfw you get a (you) from anaconda
Not a good look. lol
Lefties really exist in an alternative reality where all the evil in the world is caused by those racist nationalists and their massive capitalist propaganda machine of hate and whatever.
Leftist influence in schools, universities, and news, social, and entertainment media all work together to create this alternative reality and they've gotten very, very, very good at it...hence the selective outrage and cognitive dissonance our prog friends are known for.
The situation isn't helped by the fact that they're possibly the most coddled demographic of human beings in history, existing in the most prosperous and peaceful nation in history...so they've got no sense of what violence and oppression really means, so when media, without context, tells them about x number of "mass shootings", or "police shootings" they flip out and file it under "evils (obviously caused by racist nationalists)" and that becomes their thing for the next month. The groundwork was already laid down from a lifetime of propaganda. It's actually quite impressive how the left has managed to build this system and weave it seamlessly into the decay of Western masculinity.
yeah...the thing is that most of them are shit tier and can fuck you over on a whim. this becomes a problem when looking for "long term investments"
The fact people are acting surprised by this...lol
^correct answer
What's "faggotry" is this dogmatic adherence to the old leftist talking point of "race is just skin color." It's not.
This is the "conservatives are just liberals from 20 years ago" meme in full effect. Why do you claim to conserve a only few concepts from the people that built the country - like the 2nd and 1st amendments - and reject everything else?
Holding people responsible for their behavior inevitably leads to the conclusion that some types of people are consistently better than others. This is backed up by genetic research. No, it's not a consequence of socioeconomic status or "oppression."
The first step to solving a problem is recognizing its existence. I understand that this isn't the Trump administration stance but the right-wing community needs to realize at some point that we will never win ultimately if we continue to engage with the left within a framework designed by the left and that includes race.
no one here is claiming that reality is not more complicated than race. the argument here is that race is more complicated than skin color.
can we drop this tired "skin color" thing already and stop pretending race is just the color of your skin?
ah yes...all of this is a direct result of white liberals...just like blacks in africa...its the evil white colonialists liberals the only thing standing between blacks and first world society and muh nucular familiy structure!1!!
are there blacks who function in american society? yes. are white liberals a cancer on everything they touch, including blacks and black culture? yes. does this negate the general pattern? no.
cease this faggotry or I bring out the statistics, pede....
Kaitlin Bennett
Look up interracial rape statistics
I am dating a Kenyan woman
Lol. Of course. Racemixing is genocide, haven't you heard? That means it's important for the state to ensure this is not what the state promotes which leads to the normalization of ideas which literally destroy races, which is genocide and morally wrong. Let's make it a crime.
You're already slowly becoming a collectivist theocracy based on a shaky grounding of a sort idea of atheist humanist morality.
Nope. I am an individualist, a Constitutionalist and my morals have nothing to do with atheism.
As to the rest of what you said, you're simply using the "think of the children!" to push for government to regulate "adultery" (whatever that means). Just because we oppose perversions such as transsexualism and oppose this being pushed to kids does not mean we get to push our religious bullshit on people.
Law of Nature and Nature's God.
I'm done with this conversation; this is complete faggotry and this brand of conservatism is cancerous and morbidly hypocritical. You can have the last word if that's what you need to continue to feel morally superior. Have a nice night.
That's a lot of righteous-sounding words.
Translation: "I am a collectivist and want a theocracy!"
No, the government is not illegalizing consensual heterosexual sex between adults.
If you feel Christian morality (or what you call Christian morality) is the only way, do your part to make it actually oppose leftism in the public eye. It currently doesn't. Don't advocate for the government to force it on people. We have no new continent to flee from religious oppression so if this is your idea of America 2.0, be prepared to fight two civil wars (and if you think the people that historically fought and continue to fight America's wars weren't "sexually degenerate" you're deluded).
As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion, [...]
(Tripoli, 1796)
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion
the laws of Nature and Nature's God
ben franklin wants to know your location
there is also a very strong case to be made that women voting or holding public office is very bad for society, both respective and irrespective of religion. somehow i get the feeling you won't like that as much. and unlike literally regulating "fornication" (a religious term) legally, it has original constitutional basis.
But if you think our little experiment and sexual degeneracy in the last 60 years has worked out well for us and I don't know what to tell you.
Lol. You're deluding yourself if you think people in the past weren't "sexual degenerates." The problem is feminism. Get rid of it at all levels, teach men to be masculine, society will be fine.
If you want to subscribe to a particular system of morality, that is your decision. Don't try to use the government to force it on other people. That is part of the reason America happened in the first place.
Where do you draw the line? Should I have my eye put out because I looked at a woman. Should women be mandated to wear head coverings because Paul said so? Or because it prevents social degeneracy and has nothing to do with religion, at all, whatsoever, nothing to see here?
To answer your question, the founding fathers, some of whom were extremely "degenerate" by u/Zekk 's standards, wrote about this thing called "the laws of Nature and Nature's God."
The job of the government is not to force one person's idea of morality onto another. It doesn't matter if the morality is based on feminist theory on avoiding the objectification of women or on "the Bible said so."
u/Zekk is trying to act as if government implementing this type of legislation has any sort of historical precedent or constitutional grounds. it doesn't. he is a religious person advocating for laws concerning the establishment of religion.
"This law is about preventing social degeneracy by mandating burqas, not religion!"
lol