"When I am weaker than you, I ask you for Freedom because that is according to your principles; when I am stronger than you, I take away your Freedom because that is according to my principles.” - Frank Herbert, Children of Dune

"For should the enemy strengthen his van, he will weaken his rear; should he strengthen his rear, he will weaken his van; should he strengthen his left, he will weaken his right; should he strengthen his right, he will weaken his left. If he sends reinforcements everywhere, he will everywhere be weak."

This is the basics of how you can overcome a superior enemy. So if you want to save America, if you want to resist the tyranny that is coming, please heed this advice. If you peacefully protest and you want to do so in a place where you won't be murdered by your government for exercising your God-given rights to freedom of speech, assembly, and expression, I recommend keeping this in mind. The government freaked out over the 6th of Jan. protests. I think this is all an act, that it's feigned, and they are just using it to concentrate military power in the capitol to show us how strong they are and how weak we are. Whether it's true fear or a calculate false-flag doesn't really matter, what matters if where they have concentrated their forces and where they are weak. Right now they are trying to use this show of force to scare us into accepting tyranny without any resistance. Biden's administration isn't the end state, it's one step along the path to communism, re-education camps, and finally genocide of our culture so that these people can, in their minds, rebuild the world into their evil vision.

Don't go to where you will be outnumbered by your enemies. Your enemies have completed their long march through the institutions; they control the media, the education system, healthcare, etc. So if the media is your enemy and is strong in a location, avoid them. They will selectively edit your actions in order to portray you as violent racists; the police & military are there to subdue you by force; and if they have no justification, their agents are there to create a justification for using violence against you.

So don't go on facebook or twitter and try to spread your message there. They control facebook and twitter, and that's where they're strong. Your act of spreading a counter-narrative on their platforms will give them all the information they need to identify you and put you on the list for elimination in the future. Instead go to where they are weak and spread your message in those places, especially to people who have been banned, censored, and kicked off their strongholds. You can do this in person, you can do it in smaller online communities, and you can do it in your everyday life. It's amazing how easily you can turn someone towards the truth when you are confident enough to speak up about what is going on. Many other people feel the same way but are too scared to speak, but if you lead them they'll follow. If you don't though, they'll go with the flow and their labor will be taxed and extracted and will support the enemy. Their eyeballs will provide ad revenue to enemy websites, their subscriptions to news services will provide revenue to enemy media, and their lack of education will allow false academics and scientists to prevail over the truth.

It's good that we didn't have people show up and start a shooting fest at the capitol today. They would've all died and the enemy would've used it as an excuse to eliminate anyone guilty of thoughtcrime. Instead, we can pressure local politicians that are corrupt while the focus is on D.C. and state capitols. We can use their show of force to convince normies how absolutely insane our government is overreacting right now (more soldiers in D.C. than in Iraq & Afghanistan combined, all to protect "the most popular president in history"). Once people are convinced that there are those in government and NGOs that want them dead, want to rape their children, and think it's funny, they'll open their eyes and see the craziness for what it is. They won't be able to deny the truth any longer and they'll be our allies in the movement for freedom from oppressive and tyrannical leaders.

(n/t)

I hope everyone here realizes that now.

It just hit me how ridiculous the situation has become. We allow ourselves to be lorded over by cowardly, unelected bureaucrats who won't answer their phones, won't read letters, and won't meet their so-called constituents. These types of people are afraid of antifa for Heaven's sake. And yet we accept it. Not only that, we help reinforce the system by tearing down anyone courageous enough to put a stop to it. 

Any call to action is met with responses of "shill" and "fedposter", even if that person is simply calling us to protest and freely exercise our God given rights. That is the real problem. We have been even more cowardly, and because of that we haven't fixed all of this corruption. Hopefully that changes on 6 January. Good luck and Godspeed everyone. 

I wanted to pass along some helpful info, since it's likely cell signals won't work and you might need a way to communicate with your group if you get split up. Before leaving have a designated rally point pre-arranged so everyone knows where to go if you get split up.

1.) Open Street Map for navigation & offline maps

(Note: there are some open source solutions that bundle communication & map marking together with this. Watch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXuQERL_e8M for more info. You can download stuff like ATAK/CivTak or other apps to keep in touch with your friends via radio communication and have updates shown on your map)

2.) Mesh networking apps such as firechat, element.io, or bridgefy. These generally work based on your cell phone's bluetooth antenna, so they're only good for short range communication unless a lot of people in the crowd have it instannce. But if someone gets separated from in the crowd but is still nearby, you could probably still reach them with your phone's bluetooth antenna.

3.) HAM Radio Info A large group of people will be on 462.7125 / FRS ch. 7 / GMRS ch 15

Some bands require a license to communicate on but listening is fine. W3DOS repeater located at the Harry S. Truman Building on the western edge of the National Mall.

145.190 -0.6mhz offset 151.4 tone

https://repeaterbook.com/repeaters/details.php?state_id=11&ID=2

K3VOA repeater located at the Wilburn J Cohen building at the eastern edge of the National Mall.

147.045 +0.6mhz offset 77.0 tone

https://repeaterbook.com/repeaters/details.php?state_id=11&ID=3

W4AVA Arlington, VA. This is a very large coverage repeater with 5 remote receivers.

146.625 -0.6mhz offset 107.2 tone

https://repeaterbook.com/repeaters/details.php?state_id=51&ID=24 https://www.ar15.com/forums/General/January-6th-marching-orders-1-2-Added-offline-map-info-and-HAM-repeaters-pg-15-/5-2404097/?page=15

Be careful once night falls everyone. Communists will be looking to pick off stragglers, and we've seen them setup murder squads already. Don't get caught out alone at night.

His presentation was a little hard to follow so I thought I would try to clarify it. Credit to 4chan anons for helping simplify this. Key to understanding why his presentation is different is that he is not grouping people into simple age ranges, he's dividing them into about 900 groups such as: [19 year old Females, Democrats], [20 year old Females, Swing voters] ad infinitum and analyzing these metrics across all 900 or so groups or "buckets" as he calls them.

Issue #1: Voter Consistency By assigning voters an arbitrary political leaning category (1 through 5) based on their voting history, he found that males as they age stay in their political leaning category about 64% of the time while females are less stable and stay in their category about 58% of the time. The data shows that many individuals (~40%) of both sexes across all of his arbitrary groups show a consistent pattern of changing their voting habits as they age.

But there is a third gender option, "U" (undefined/undecided/unknown). There are approximately 460k "U" voters registered in Arizona.

The issue is that these "U" voters have a 94% consistency in their voting trend over time. They buck the trends of both Males and Females and don't really change their politics at all as they age.

Issue #2: Voter Distribution Next is the distribution of voters among these arbitrary classifications. In Arizona you would expect to have more Republicans than Democrats registered, with the least amount of the voter population going to independents.

Instead what he saw was a near perfect normal ("bell curve") distribution, with the highest number being swing voters, and roughly equal numbers on either side. 14k (Category 1), 122k (Category 2), 186k (Category 3), 120k (Category 4), 20k (Category).

Issue #3: Voter Turn-out This is where I think the fraud becomes very obvious. Next he compared the maximum number of registered "U" voters in each precinct (about 1,500) to the number who actually voted, and he found that about 97% of the "U" voters voted in 2020. In some places such as Apache County he found that 99.9% of registered "U" voters voted. (Arizona does not allow same day voter registration.)

Typically you might see turn-out like this: No groups voting above about 80%, and the very young and the very elderly having lower turn-out rates than the middle aged & elderly. https://miro.medium.com/max/2800/1*rw86T31IBAzMmvfH8df8Wg.png

The reason why this wasn't caught by other researchers is that analysts typically lump groups in by age ranges and so it wouldn't be caught that way. (ie. if 97% of 18 through 25 year old "U" voters voted, both only 60% of all 18-25 year old Males and Females voted, you might see an overall voter participation of something like 65% in that age range and think it's normal).

Issue #4: Historical Fraud & Growth Once he realized all this he went back and looked at historical voter data in Arizona and found the same issues going back until at least 2008. Additionally, based on U.S. Census data he was seeing an annual population growth rate of only 1% per year, but a growth in registered voters of 7% per year. Compounded, he stated there was a growth of about 40% in population over the period he looked at while the number of voters increased by 300%. This is where he gets his assertion that this fraud has grown bit by bit, kind of like what you'd see in a financial crimes case where the criminal slowly gets more and more bold. Finally, he caps it off with the allegation that the Republicans must know about this and be in on it as well, as the data points to a consistent gap between the parties showing that the two groups are effectively maintaining a status quo and determining behind closed doors who will win elections.

*Background & References: He stated his data sources were from publicly available government sources, such as the U.S. census and Arizona voting records.

1.) Arizona historical & 2020 voter data: https://azsos.gov/elections/voter-registration-historical-election-data 2.) U.S. census data for Arizona https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/AZ 3.) Voter registration by party in AZ https://azsos.gov/elections/voter-registration-historical-election-data

Classification of voters' political leanings: I think we need more info from him on this, not that I think the classification process is particularly relevant, but it could work something like this. Based on voter trends he could classified voters according to their political leaning from 1 to 5. For example, a hard dem that votes in all Democratic primaries might be a 1, a hard republican = 5, swing voter = 3, and moderate dem/republican are a 2 or 4. (Note: Technically who you vote for is anonymous, but with data analysis you can categorize people pretty well). Then he added in age and sex (M, F, "U") and bucketed them into his 800-900 categories that are a combination of Age, Sex, and Political Leaning.

Today, Bobby Piton provided proof of voter fraud in Arizona. Then he went further, and looked at historical election data as well (provided by the State of Arizona) and found similar issues there as well. His evidence is compelling and it looks like he has uncovered how fake voters are added and how the voter distribution algorithm works. His work has not been redone yet for other states, but it should be possible and I expect we'll see more people follow his lead in the coming days. He was immediately censored on Twitter.

Here is an interview with him done today: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaaPhvCe74s&feature=youtu.be

Here is his presentation to the Arizona hearing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rri6flxaXww (*Note: This is still live so I can't give a timestamp. As of about 8PM EST, rewind about 3hrs and 25 minutes. He speaks right after Matt Braynard and Dr. Shiva.)

As of yesterday, 3 counties had recorded miscounts in ballots, all negatively impacted Trump. Overall about 8-10% of the gap between Trump and Biden disappeared because of this.

Today, the GOP is reporting that there was a miscount in DeKalb county (Atlanta area, heavily Democrat), of 9,626 votes. The batch in question was originally counted as 10,707 for Biden and 13 for Trump. Upon recount, it appears to be 1,081 for Biden and 13 for Trump. Democrats are claiming this doesn't matter, because the overall numbers remain the same, while GOP asserts it's impossible to tell yet because the recount hasn't finished, so total numbers are still unknown.

Source: GOP on twitter https://i.4cdn.org/pol/1605710553457.jpg https://twitter.com/DavidShafer?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor

(n/t)

Hey everyone, I know we've all been censored by some combination of Youtube / Google / Facebook / Twitter at this point. I kept seeing a lot of videos & creators get taken down, and using Youtube downloader sites was a pain in the neck and wouldn't work for batches of videos. I wanted something simple I could use to backup large playlists easily. youtube-dl (https://youtube-dl.org/) is open source software that the RIAA has DMCA'd off of github recently. It's command line only at this point, but it's relatively simple to setup (guide: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wfUUZvybPY) and it works on a variety of video sites, even some NSFW ones (/hint).

Anyway, since we know more censorship is coming and more of our content creators are going to be de-platformed, you can use this to backup everything to an external hard drive or your PC.

For example, Demolition Ranch is a gun channel that could be deplatformed. I like their videos and want to save them for posterity. First you need a playlist URL, either from their playlists or from their All Videos List under the Videos section of their channel. Once you're on the playlist page, right click the name of the playlist in the top right above the listed videos and copy the URL (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=UUBvc7pmUp9wiZIFOXEp1sCg). This URL for all of their videos contains 436 videos. After you've copied the URL (for playlists it must have "playlist" in the URL), then run youtube-dl, select download as a video, paste the URL, confirm, and hit enter. Now it'll download all the videos in sequence to my specified downloads folder. If you select audio, it'll convert all the files to .mp3s, so that's useful for stuff like podcasts. As another exmaple, if you wanted all of Louder with Crowder's podcasts, you'd paste his podcast playlist url (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL3e1orPYt_4YwSmw1vhXbxfm4fHZdlCkP) and it'll download about 248 videos for you.

If your internet has an issue or you run out of storage or something, just hit enter after you've fixed the problem and it'll keep downloading from where it left off.

If you really want to be clever and have some programming skills, you could probably use RSS feeds or API calls to automatically alert your computer that it needs to downloads your favorite channels every time they upload a new video, and then you can watch everything you enjoy without ads or ever visiting youtube.

Whatever you do though, don't set your download filepath to "/dev/null" (Posix) or "nul" (Windows), because then the videos will be downloaded but won't actually be saved to your device. While this avoids storing anything on your hard drive, it's a huge waste of Youtube's bandwidth and that costs our friends over there money.

Edit: further advice from another person

youtube-dl -F <video_page/url>

'-F' will list the available formats - then i pick the video resolution i want and...

youtube-dl -f <n>+bestaudio <video_page/url>

where 'n' is the number of the video that corresponds to the resolution you want

If you live in a state that was stolen, then you probably live in a state with a GOP legislature, governor, and maybe even congresscritter. Despite all that, they somehow allowed an election to be run where the race for the RINO GOP seats was fair, but the race for the President was completely rigged. This plus the GOP's complete lack of support for Trump over the last four years, and their current limp-noodle support of President Trump in an election crisis should tell you all you need to know to conclude that the GOP made a deal with the DNC to rig the vote against President Trump.

At the rallies today, organize with other like-minded people and start a recall. The Democrats, Antifa, and BLM will probably be only too happy to help, which will put actual pressure on these traitors.

So I just wanted to go over this with everyone because I see a lot of hopium out there about how a recount will prove the Democrats cheated and save the election. First I want to go over why some of what people are hoping for won't work, and then cover what the Trump campaign can and probably is doing to reverse voter fraud.

We already know via statistical analysis that there was widespread voter fraud in places like Wisconsin*. Unfortunately math probably won't be convincing to the courts, and the only hope of it doing anything would be to convince the state assemblies to submit their electoral votes for Trump despite what the vote says, which would probably cause a civil war and is only really a possibility in GA.

So first up, let's understand some relevant forms of voter fraud and how they'd work. In this election, there was a huge push to allow mail-in voting in all cases due to the Wuhan flu, instead of only in exceptional cases (eg. deployed military serving overseas) so I'll focus on that. What mail-in voting does is it opens the door to several more types of voter fraud and tampering. If you're in a state that requires voter ID, you no longer need a valid ID to vote; even if you had to mail a copy of your ID or enter in your driver's license number or SSN, the state already has access to all that information as well as many private companies (facebook, google, experian, etc. etc.). So voter ID is useless now in preventing fraud because one person with access to a programmer and a database can get around it.

Next, what about addresses and registrations? Well registering someone to vote is pretty easy if you have access to the right data, which you do. You start with a list of deceased and non-voters and write a script / pay off-shore labor to register those voters. Now you can send their ballot anywhere you want. This fraud can be cross-referenced though and sending 138,000 ballots to a PO Box might be suspicious (who knows though, this is America!). So depending on your level of support from the local USPS branches and local community, you can still send the living recipient's ballot to their actual address so long as you can either intercept the ballots on the way to their destination or get to the mailbox before the resident. So now you have properly registered voters, properly mailed ballots, and next all you need to do is pick them up, fill them out, and send them back. You have a variety of options at this point: 1.) Stop by and intimidate or pay the voter for filling the ballot out for your candidate. This is what Ilhan Omar does. 2.) Intercept the mail before the recipient gets home and mail it back yourself. This is what drug dealers do when mailing drugs between states. After this is complete, you now have original ballots that have been properly sent and returned for registered voters. And the voters themselves had very little or nothing to do with the entire process, and in most cases will never realize the fraud has even happened. Dead voters and ballots sent to different addresses than on the voter's current ID cards are easy giveaways that fraud has probably occurred, but as long as you minimize this and actually send them to the voter's current address, there's not much the other side can do to prove you've committed fraud unless a whistle blower comes forward with mountains of evidence, which they won't because they're well-paid and will have your political protection once you win.

Anyway, the bottom line is that if someone votes for you via mail and you're someone who was never going to vote anyway, you'll never realize and no one can prove it's a false vote except possibly through signature analysis, which isn't allowed in places like PA*, since you can't ask people who they voted for. The other way to prove this fraud is for millions of people disinterested in politics to jump through some hoops to check their voter registration status and if a vote was recorded in their name, jump through more hoops to report the fraud to the same people who are committing it.

If you've read this far, now I hope you realize why "watermarking" and "blockchain ballots" are a meme and wouldn't actually prevent this type of fraud. Therefore we can conclude that this is hopium and probably another Q type psyop intended to get you to stand down and sit at home while your election is stolen.

Now, that being said, there are still some other things the Trump campaign can do to prove fraud and get fraudulent ballots rejected. First is to identify where the fraud took place, such as through the below statistical analysis, and to focus on those areas so you can overturn the most fraudulent ballots. Second would be to challenge all votes by dead people. That's an easy win because you can cross reference a database of deaths with a database of votes, but your opponent probably wasn't stupid enough to rely on it entirely (eg. only 14,000 dead voters in Michigan). Third, you try to invalidate as many fraudulent ballots as possible based on signatures not matching. This is a little harder, because some states have ruled against it. You probably don't have experts that can analyze ever signature as well, so a lot will slip through, and your opponent could've used access to that person's signature to approximate a close forgery to pass a cursory inspection. Fourth, is to drive support to organizations like Veritas and Judicial Watch so they can use the funding to provide bounties to whistle blowers. The low level people are motivated by greed and would have no problem throwing their masters under the bus if they knew they'd be getting paid more. Fifth is that I would go after the non-voters that voted and ask them to check to see if they voted and to inform you if it was fraudulent. Then you can get sworn affidavits that they did not in fact vote, and someone voted for them. This is probably one of your weaker options since it would be time-consuming, expensive, and probably wouldn't pay off with hundreds of thousands of people.

I hope this has been helpful, so please provide any other options you can think of or feedback. But I think focusing on "watermarks" and thinking DHS has some super secret plan to stop all this fraud is wishful thinking and will lead us down the same path of inaction and complacency that Q did.

*Wisconsin Voter Fraud https://files.catbox.moe/4yskmp.jpg https://files.catbox.moe/we6cpu.jpeg https://files.catbox.moe/nll285.png

*Pennsylvania court ruled that ballots can't be rejected due to signatures not matching: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/23/pennsylvania-court-ballot-signatures-431794

[Edit:] I left out tampering but that one's easy. Since there's no chain of custody, and there aren't independent observers throughout the whole process, you can just lose entire boxes of mail from Republican heavy districts and no one will know if the people just didn't want to vote or if their votes were stolen. Later on in the mailroom if you're feeling even more daring, you can open them and discard your opponent's ballots (as seen on video already).

[Edit2:] Example of this: Trump team in action cross-referencing change of addresses with votes cast. 3,062 confirmed cases of people changing their address but still casting ballots in Nevada. https://media.thedonald.win/post/0LaMYecT.jpeg. The problem is if you only catch 10% of the fraud, it might not be enough to flip the states.

Stolen from phrack:

Registration frauds - Register dead, non-existent voters, etc. Votes are then cast under the fake voters' names on election day.

Repeating - Persons go from precinct to precinct voting under the names of these bogus voters, or even under the names of real voters. Busing of people between polling stations throughout the day.

Ballot box stuffing - Officers overseeing the election will stuff ballots into the box. To avoid obvious counting issues, they will check off the name of a no-show voter for each fraudulent ballot inserted. Democrats have a list of no-shows at the end of counting, see how far behind they are, and fill out ballots for these people.

Chain ballots - A marked official ballot is given to a voter in the morning. The voter is to deposit the market ballot and return the blank ballot given to them at the polling station. They are paid once the blank ballot is returned. This process continues all day. Harris notes a lack of evidence that this was a common practice.

Assistance to voters - Voters may ask for assistance while casting their ballot. This is an easy way to break voter secrecy and ensure people are voting "the right way." They may ask for assistance willingly, or they may be intimidated into doing so.

Intimidation and violence - Chicago, IL is a notoriously corrupt city. Harris noted whole sections of the city being terrorized by "the gun play of gangsters." Kidnapping had even been used to remove determined poll watchers.

Altering ballots - If a voter fails to vote for all candidates, an election officer can simply add marks for their preferred candidate. Likewise excess marks can be added to disqualify a ballot voting for unfavored candidates. (This was tried and overruled by the courts this year. They said you could "correct" your ballot if you made a mistake, which would've allowed poll workers to "correct" anyone's ballot.)

Substitution of ballots - Legitimate ballots may be discarded, and other ballots substituted for them.

False count and false returns - It's well understood that it's much easier to simply rig the counting of votes than to alter ballots. In some cases ballots are not counted at all, and results are simply fabricated. Votes can also be read and/or recorded incorrectly by various precinct workers.

Altering returns - The precinct returns can be altered by officials in the election office.