I'm Chinese and a libertarian and believe Trump needs to win or liberty across the globe is doomed.
One of the funniest things to me is how Reddit is 100% in support of Hong Kong but hates Trump. The people of Hong Kong are literally crying for a Trump-led America to liberate them. Gotta love cognitive dissonance.
They are scared to decide. The other 2 have been around long enough. The other 3 are afraid Libtards will say mean things and hurt their families
Called this. Feels like Pilate at the Trial of Jesus. SCOTUS is afraid to decide so is just hoping it will go away.
I’m starting to get less optimistic in the jury box. We have arguments, evidence and clear violations of procedural and legislative process but if no unbiased judge is willing to hear it - it’s all useless.
Unless you have brave judges that believe in justice, the law and the constitution in the appellate courts, they will just dodge any decision that comes up. The lower compromised judges have given the media, elite and Leftists what they want to hear - it takes a brave person to reverse that.
The courts are just hoping we will shut up when Jan 20 passes, that’s all.
They are refusing to address the evidence because they know that they can't take a fight on the evidence. Like without a friendly judge, the evidence will stand.
So the strategy seems to be to try to get the case thrown out procedurally (laches, wrong forum etc), citing judgments from partisan state courts and using the media to run cover. Look at the choice of wording "alternate reality"; they are trying to paint us as crazies and pressure the SCOTUS into not hearing the evidence.
It does read like a 18 year old gender studies major wrote it though! Did they just hire a CNN correspondent to draft this? I could have done a better job in my 2nd year at law school...
Agree 100% with this.
Leave vulnerabilities and the TDS people who have been brainwashed into thinking Trump is the literal devil will do the rest out of misguided patriotism (or the promise of free shit)
Follow the money
They don't mind as long as the churches don't upset the established order. Christianity is very popular in the large and most international cities in China actually...
I am Chinese ethnically but family moved out probably over 80 years ago. I still visit from time to time.
You are 100% right - you can get away with so much shit in China. People think that the Chinese are commies trying to destroy America. That isn't 100% accurate - they want to own America. The Chinese elite are just like the US elite (Wall Street, Silicon Valley, Democrats, RINOs) - all they want is power and money. Communism is just the tool used to control the population. Nothing about how the Chinese elite live is fucking communist.
You scare the population into giving up their rights with the false promise of socialism so that you can spy on them, brainwash them and make them do exactly what you want them to do.
This is why the Democrat playbook looks EXACTLY LIKE THE CCP PLAYBOOK - THEIR OBJECTIVES ARE EXACTLY THE SAME!
Yeah but you underestimate lawyers’ abilities to read bullshit into basic English. If I were a SCOTUS judge who wanted to not decide this case, I’ll try some bullshit reasoning like “Well all these matters are still being litigated at state level so the SC is not the right forum at this time. Please come back after Pennsylvania / Michigan etc have made final finding on facts”.
If they try something like that - who else can you appeal to?
Maybe I am just overthinking it because our case is strong on paper, just running through possibilities of what sort of fuckery is available to the Dems.
Agreed.
We should be in war mode now. But the swamp know this and will keep trying to kill our momentum and enthusiasm.
Maybe in Jan, Barr will start another “investigation” which will go on for 3 years to give us hope. Maybe Biden will provide a round of handouts so some conservatives will fall in line. The MSM will keep painting us as crazies, so pedes who can’t afford to lose their jobs / get doxxed will stand down. Hell, maybe Biden will go to war with a shithole country to distract everyone.
When the psy ops get ramped up - how will we organise?
You are right but you are thinking of the SCOTUS justices as infallible judges, which is what they should be.
I’m worried that they are human and will refuse to take the pressure if they can see a way out.
It’s terrifying.
I’m an ex-leftist surrounded by leftists because of my job. My close friends and colleagues are all sensible center left liberals. They think Trump is evil because all the good he has done is buried by the MSM.
The moment I sit down with them and explain (and show them) for 10 mins what is actually in the lawsuits that is unreported, they immediately ask “WTF WHY ISNT THIS REPORTED?”
Literally everyone I have spoken to believe there is at least some fuckery now. You can’t unsee it once you realise the media is lying to you.
Agreed. But SCOTUS justices are also people with kids and family to be doxxed and legacies to be ruined by the MSM.
This was my initial reaction to it too.
I looked into it a bit further today and I think there may be enough wiggle room for SCOTUS to wiggle out of deciding it and try to say this should be addressed at state level with certain points of law to come up to the SCOTUS afterwards on appeal (if any).
My worry is that no judge in the world wants to touch this case right now. We have very strong evidence but look at all the "failed" lawsuits. Every judge is trying to kick the can to somebody else using procedural bullshit like no legal standing, untimely filing etc because the MSM and the leftist mob will lynch them if they consider the evidence and make the ruling which the evidence will force them to make. Judges are afraid of hearing the evidence.
If I were a Democrat legal strategist, the play I would run right now is to convince the SCOTUS that this matter needs to be handled at state level first, then attempt all sorts of state-level fuckery to drag the legal issues out for years.
If they do this, us Trump supporters won't be able to unite since some will still "hold the line" and "wait for the process" while others will think its time to take to the streets which will allow them to divide and conquer using the MSM.
There is a legal principle that justice delayed is justice denied. Hopefully the SCOTUS has this in mind when considering the Texas lawsuit.
I gave the lawsuits further thought this morning (I wrote a semi-popular summary about the Texas lawsuit yesterday) and while I think Texas has a great case, my fear now is that the SCOTUS refuses to decide this citing some procedural bullshit.
The Dems could potentially have a winning strategy by simply keeping all the legal disputes stuck in the court court for years and years while painting all of us as crazies using the MSM.
I am actually quite afraid of this strategy since we won't be able to organize at all since people will still keep believing in the jury box.
We really do need a repository of information / explanations like a wiki as you suggest.
Brilliant! This will actually bypass all the state court level fuckery!
Brilliant! I wrote a summary explaining the lawsuit about an hour or so ago and a few people asked about timeline - so here it is!
Court has jurisdiction regarding choice of remedy but I don't see them wanting to do anything other than what Texas wants if they find in our favor.
Yes the SCOTUS has jurisdiction but I don't see them exercising their jurisdiction to provide any other remedy.
The evidence is there - the Democrats will try to contest the evidence by saying witnesses were lying, it was 20k votes instead of 100k etc.
Of course. They just need the Supreme Court to believe that. This is where the Democrats will try to take the fight.
Well, it will definitely happen before Jan 21!
Merits-wise, I covered it a bit above. The outcome will likely be a finding that there was election fuckery but whether or not we get the remedy we want will depend on how well the team is able to convince the judges that enough ballots were compromised.
Agreed as a matter of principle in any voting system.
However how the law works is to ask what injury you have suffered. If you lose by 10,000 votes but you can prove that 2,000 votes are fraudulent, the judge will say "Well even if we don't count the 2,000 votes, you still lost so you suffered no injury".
I am very sorry for your loss. May God bless his soul.
Yes it means they would not grant the immediate injunctive relief but wanted to hear the case to rule on it.
Immediate relief means stopping certifying until the Dems respond to the case.