1
leftistMediaFakeNews 1 point ago +1 / -0

That Neil Ferguson guy is a fraud, no idea why people believed him in the first lace.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/05/05/exclusive-government-scientist-neil-ferguson-resigns-breaking/

Government scientist Neil Ferguson resigns after breaking lockdown rules to meet his married lover

Dude was bringing over his mistress while he was covid +ve.

2001 Professor Ferguson worked on research that led to the mass culling of hundreds of thousands of farm animals during the 2001 foot and mouth disease epidemic. His work was later challenged in reviews by other academics.

2002 Predicted that between 50 and 50,000 people could die from exposure to BSE (mad cow disease) in beef. He also predicted that number could rise to 150,000 if there was a sheep epidemic as well. In the UK, there have been fewer than 200 deaths from the human form of BSE

2005 Prof Ferguson claimed that up to 200 million people could be killed from bird flu. In an interview with the Guardian, he compared it to the 1918 Spanish flu, adding: “There are six times more people on the planet now so you could scale it up to around 200 million people probably.” Only several hundred people died worldwide.

2009 The Imperial team predicted that swine flu had a case fatality rate of between 0.3 per cent and 1.5 per cent, with his most likely estimate landing at 0.4 per cent. A Government estimate based on his advice was that a reasonable worst-case scenario was the disease would lead to 65,000 UK deaths. Swine flu killed just 457 people in the UK, with the chief medical officer concluding in 2009 that the actual mortality rate was 0.026 per cent.

March 2020 A paper produced by Prof Ferguson’s team predicted that the coronavirus pandemic could lead to 250,000 deaths in the UK unless stringent lockdown measures were implemented. His research is said to have convinced the Government to change direction.

May 5 2020 Professor Ferguson quits the Scientific Advisory Group on Emergencies (Sage) after The Telegraph confronts him over his married lover visiting him at his home, thereby breaking the lockdown rules

6
leftistMediaFakeNews 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yep. In marketing, we have this thing called "call to action". A website which doesn't have a "call to action" button sucks balls. That's why Trump uses "Make", "Lock", "Build", "Drain" and so on! It makes people excited to do things.

1
leftistMediaFakeNews 1 point ago +1 / -0

You know the Dershowitz accusations were made up by the media? It's in the 2000 page Epstein docs.

Source:

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/6250471/Epstein-Docs.pdf

Read the footnotes on page 805 onwards:

A telling example is a series of emails between plaintiff and reporter Churcher when plaintiff was working on negotiating a book deal about her alleged experiences and Churcher was trying to help her. On May 10, 2011, plaintiff tells Churcher she cannot remember whom she had told Churcher she had had sex with. Churcher responds responds, “Don’t forget Alan Dershowitz,” which Churcher says is a “good name for [plaintiff’s] pitch” to her literary agent. It is clear neither Churcher nor plaintiff believed plaintiff had had sex with Professor Dershowitz, since (a) Churcher suggests that he would be a “good name” to “pitch” because of his prominence (“he [represented] Claus von Bulow and a movie was made about that case…title was Reversal of Fortune”), and (b) Churcher states, “We all suspect [Professor Dershowitz] is a pedo[phile] and tho no proof of that, you probably met him when he was hanging put w [Epstein].” Menninger Decl., EXHIBIT.OO, at Giuffre004096-97 (emphasis supplied).

Plaintiff granted journalist Sharon Churcher extensive interviews that resulted in seven (7) widely distributed articles from March 2011 through January 2015. Churcher regularly communicated with plaintiff and her “attorneys or other agents” from “early 2011” to “the present day.” Plaintiff received approximately $160,000 for her stories and pictures that were published by many news organizations.

Another lie which media reported was that Trump was on the island or had sex with the girls. Page 1914 - 1920 of the PDF, Virgina explains that the reporter Sharon was making shit up.

Another lie media tells you is that Trump was on the Lolita Express and went to the island which is also false. Trump was never on the Lolita Express which was a Boeing 727. Trump was on his other plane which was a Gulfstream G500 which he flew January 1997 from Florida to New Jersey.

7
leftistMediaFakeNews 7 points ago +7 / -0
🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧
🚧🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🚧
🚧🇺🇸👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻🇺🇸🚧
🚧🇺🇸👌🏻👊🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👊🏻👌🏻🇺🇸🚧
🚧🇺🇸👌🏻👉🏻👍🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👍🏼👈🏻👌🏻🇺🇸🚧
🚧🇺🇸👌🏻👉🏻👉🏼👍🏽👇🏽👇🏽👇🏽👇🏽👇🏽👍🏽👈🏼👈🏻👌🏻🇺🇸🚧
🚧🇺🇸👌🏻👉🏻👉🏼👉🏽👍🏾👇🏾👇🏾👇🏾👍🏾👈🏽👈🏼👈🏻👌🏻🇺🇸🚧
🚧🇺🇸👌🏻👉🏻👉🏼👉🏽👉🏾👍🏿👇🏿👍🏿👈🏾👈🏽👈🏼👈🏻👌🏻🇺🇸🚧
🚧🇺🇸👌🏻👉🏻👉🏼👉🏽👉🏾👉🏿🐸👈🏿👈🏾👈🏽👈🏼👈🏻👌🏻🇺🇸🚧
🚧🇺🇸👌🏻👉🏻👉🏼👉🏽👉🏾👍🏿👆🏿👍🏿👈🏾👈🏽👈🏼👈🏻👌🏻🇺🇸🚧
🚧🇺🇸👌🏻👉🏻👉🏼👉🏽👍🏾👆🏾👆🏾👆🏾👍🏾👈🏽👈🏼👈🏻👌🏻🇺🇸🚧
🚧🇺🇸👌🏻👉🏻👉🏼👍🏽👆🏽👆🏽👆🏽👆🏽👆🏽👍🏽👈🏼👈🏻👌🏻🇺🇸🚧
🚧🇺🇸👌🏻👉🏻👍🏼👆🏼👆🏼👆🏼👆🏼👆🏼👆🏼👆🏼👍🏼👈🏻👌🏻🇺🇸🚧
🚧🇺🇸👌🏻👊🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👊🏻👌🏻🇺🇸🚧
🚧🇺🇸👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻🇺🇸🚧
🚧🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🚧
🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
by reynard
2
leftistMediaFakeNews 2 points ago +2 / -0

Needs 200 lines of words too

2
leftistMediaFakeNews 2 points ago +2 / -0

Microsoft, IBM, Google, Adobe, Nokia, Harman, MasterCard and PepsiCo etc all have Indian (minority) CEOs. They are 80% of tech CEOs. This whole minorities need extra help is fucking stupid.

11
leftistMediaFakeNews 11 points ago +11 / -0

Leftists VICE doing it's best to make it seem like the bill failed because of Republicans. But it didn't. The bill amendment was to "remove browsing history" from the things FBI could track. That failed meaning FBI can continue doing it.

Bernie didn't even show up to vote. If he had shown up and voted YES, then this bill would have meant that FBI can't track browser history. Exact opposite of what this article is making it out to be.

An amendment protecting search and browsing histories failed in a 59-37 vote.

An effort to protect Americans' browsing and search histories from warrantless government surveillance failed by a single vote in the Senate on Wednesday. The privacy measure, sponsored by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Sen. Steve Daines (R-MT) got 59 votes, one vote fewer than was needed to overcome a filibuster.

A majority of senators—59 out of 100—supported the amendment. But under the Senate's dysfunctional rules, it takes a 60-vote supermajority to end debate on a proposal like this and move to a vote. So even though a majority of senators supported the amendment, it did not become part of the reauthorization bill.

Four senators—Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) missed the vote. The amendment would have passed if any of them had voted "yes."

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2020/05/limits-on-fbi-access-to-search-histories-fails-by-one-senate-vote/

2
leftistMediaFakeNews 2 points ago +2 / -0

The amendment was to "remove browsing history" from the things FBI could track. That failed meaning FBI can continue doing it.

Bernie didn't even show up to vote.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›