2
leing15 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, they wouldn't have alleged that it was a "public official's property" and arrested him if he were a BLACK LEFTIST.

3
leing15 3 points ago +3 / -0

There's also the fact that 3 people (or even if they have a few others off camera), are NOT going to be able to do much to prevent possible future fires from spreading beyond a certain area, and much less will they be able to put out or to stop fires from spreading (unless they find a little fire that just spread or they decide to put out the fire they just started). However, even one evil commie is enough to get an area of many miles destroyed by fire.

1
leing15 1 point ago +1 / -0

WHY not attempted murder? Because he's a piece of leftist garbage?

Michael Reinoehl is on surveillance video/photos lying in wait and taking out his gun, while Aaron Danielson is just walking by, but he had been charged with 2nd degree murder, instead of 1st degree.

Kyle Rittenhouse, however, was clearly defending himself, and NOTHING in the evidence available suggests he had planned to kill anyone, but he was charged with TWO counts of 1st degree murder.

THIS is systemic injustice, NOT any delusion that leftists complain and riot about.

1
leing15 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree that no one who is pro-Trump should attack any Antifa/BLM/leftist trash without a good reason, but I find it hard to believe that these proud boys attacked the trash out of the blue.

I haven't seen any video showing what happened before the PB guys went after the trash, and I have no idea if the following is true, but I saw a tweet where someone was saying that the trash was harassing or attacking a female who was with the PB, and that's why the PB attacked the trash.

I can't be 100% sure, but until I see a video showing the beginning of this conflict, I'll keep having serious doubts that this beating wasn't fully justified (I mean, beyond the fact that Antifa is commie trash and just stocked, shot and murdered a patriot, and attempted to murder another in a hit and run).

33
leing15 33 points ago +33 / -0

That's what came to my mind too.

All of these were big news and/or spread like wild fire on social media as "proof" of Trump being physically/mentally unfit for office or "proof" of some other leftard delusion:

  • Trump walking down a slippery ramp is "proof" he's ill;
  • Trump drinking water while trying to block water drops from getting his tie wet is "proof" he is too old, had a stroke, or whatever other horrible illness";
  • Trump walking a few steps in a relaxed swag was "proof" he had "mini strokes;"
  • Trump walking from the helicopter to the WH looking exhausted (because it was late, he had a full day, he's human, & works a lot just about every day), was "proof" he felt defeated and was about to resign or give up reelection.

There is probably more BS that I'm not thinking of right now, but the point is that, if it had been Trump caught with scripted questions (which we know DemocRATS have used for a long time), and if it had been Trump caught CLEARLY reading his answers to the scripted questions from a teleprompter, the clip would be all over the news and would be trending in all social media platforms immediately after the very first post in each of them.

29
leing15 29 points ago +29 / -0

I'm sure you know that you didn't hear about it because the murderer is black. If he were white, you would have seen it in the local news. But if the murderer were white and the victims were black, not only would you, and all of us, have seen it on every TV station, and both paper & online news for days, but the crime would no longer be a robbery and a double murder, but would turn into a deadly hate crime committed by a Nazi white supremacist who was emboldened by führer Trump's normalization of racism and bigotry.

1
leing15 1 point ago +1 / -0

Creepy Joe also needs to be checked for listening devices in his ear before debates.

DemocRATS are rotten trash. Nothing is too low or dirty for them.

2
leing15 2 points ago +2 / -0

I appreciate it.

Apology accepted.

Peace! And have a good day you too.

6
leing15 6 points ago +6 / -0

How is it a "revolution" if, according to the media and the DemocRATS, all they do is "peacefully protest" for "racial justice?"

I know DemocRATS and the media KNOW what is really going on, but HOW can anyone not see that, even though there will always be some racist individuals of every color, there is NO "racial injustice" anymore in America, and what these people are doing is carrying on a COMMUNIST REVOLUTION?

1
leing15 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think they will try to steal the presidency too, but they know it's even easier to steal district & state elections, and they will definitely go all in to make sure their commie, corrupt candidates for congress win.

1
leing15 1 point ago +1 / -0

True, but Republicans still have never found boxes of ballots in weird places when Republicans candidates were losing by a close margin - probably because the fraud committed by DemocRATS up to the closing of the polls had already been plenty to guarantee them the win.

Not only that, but after clear DemocRAT fraud, every time the DemocRAT candidate wins, Republicans do nothing but let them win, which emboldens and encourages them to keep cheating and upping the fraud.

2
leing15 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you think intelligence, common sense, and ability to coherently make a point is "autism," so be it. I can guarantee you that I have no neurodevelopmental, social, mental, or any other kind of disorder though.

Who cares how long a sentence is, if it can be understood?

I'm no English teacher, and I didn't even legally immigrate to the U.S. (from a non-English-speaking country) until I was 30 y.o. All I try to do is use decent grammar/spelling, and write in a way that makes sense. A long sentence does not invalidate the message expressed. You're just being petty because you have no valid point.

BTW, I have not gone on any "tirade." but you're an odd one, so I can see how you'd think I did.

2
leing15 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have read every word that you typed on your keyboard, comprehended their meaning, and ignored them with wanton disregard.

Refusing to see is utterly worse than being blind. Maybe, you do understand but willfully act as any dumb person who can barely read (dumb, if not able to read for reasons other than true lack of opportunity, which is rare, and/or disability).

I retroactively edited my posts, but I did NOT delete what was originally said, I only added the accurate information that I didn't have when the posts were written.
I ONLY edited the posts because, before knowing the origin of the pictures and reading the arrest warrant, I was suggesting that the picture in the OP was fake, and I didn't want anyone who could possibly not read the posts further down (where the context of the picture was explained) to doubt the authenticity of the picture, or wonder how the picture could be real AND fit what we can see happening in the video of the moment of the murder (both of which I had done).
I simply didn't want any of my comments suggesting that the picture was fake to be left unedited and serve as disinformation.
But, of course, you don't need to worry because I know that you can read my mind and know my intentions better than me, so you will understand what I'm saying, but will baselessly and deliberately "disregard" this too.

Despite the sarcasm, you're trying to seem very well-educated, but you make no sense. You have absolutely no reason not to believe me, but you CHOOSE to do so. This is sincerely not meant to say that YOU're stupid (I don't know enough about you to conclude that yet), and is merely an analogy, but as they say, "You can't fix stupid."

As I said before, I don't know you and you don't know me: the fact that I reply to your nonsense in no way means that I value your opinion, or that I care at all about what you think of me, or yet that I believe you care about what I think of you.

2
leing15 2 points ago +2 / -0

The two quotes you selected are NOT contradictory, despite you trying to say they are. They just confirm that what I was looking for from people who disagreed by downvoting, was a factual explanation that could help explain how the picture in this OP could fit the video of the moment the murder happened.

You actually don't seem like a nice guy, but that may be just a wrong impression that results from the fact that you don't understand what you read, even after someone thoroughly explains what they meant.

Downvotes don't matter, but you can have another one too.

1
leing15 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks! I appreciate an explanation rather than a downvote or just a downvote without any factual help.

I'll just reply to you by pasting the same thing I wrote in reply to another pede who replied to me with the same explanation:

Exactly!

It was late and I was tired to come back and post again, but I figured this out after someone here did me a favor and replied at least letting me know that the picture was from the arrest warrant document, and gave me a link to it (the only thing this thread title says is "Bastard," without mentioning the origin of the picture, and I didn't know this document was available online).

Up until the pictures and info from the arrest warrant were available, no one knew that the two patriots had just crossed the street a few seconds before Reinoehl also crossed the street after them.

While the picture from this OP and the other pictures from the arrest-warrant are real, they also confirm that Reinoehel was not hiding inside the garage in front of which the murder took place - which is what anyone who watched the video would assume, without having the knowledge that the victim and his friend had just crossed the street seconds before the shooting.

After reading the arrest warrant and again comparing video and surveillance camera snapshots, I now know the whole sequence of events starting minutes before the murder.

1
leing15 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly!

Thanks! I appreciate an explanation rather than a downvote or just a downvote without any factual help.

It was late and I was tired to come back and post again, but I figured this out after someone here did me a favor and replied at least letting me know that the picture was from the arrest warrant document, and gave me a link to it (the only thing this thread title says is "Bastard," without mentioning the origin of the picture, and I didn't know this document was available online).

Up until the pictures and info from the arrest warrant were available, no one knew that the two patriots had just crossed the street a few seconds before Reinoehl also crossed the street after them.

While the picture from this OP and the other pictures from the arrest warrant are real, they also confirm that Reinoehel was not hiding inside the garage in front of which the murder took place - which is what anyone who watched the video would assume, without having the knowledge that the victim and his friend had just crossed the street seconds before the shooting.

After reading the arrest warrant and again comparing video and surveillance camera snapshots, I now know the whole sequence of events starting minutes before the murder.

2
leing15 2 points ago +2 / -0

I did NOT edit the post to complain about one or more downvotes (which I figured would come); I edited my comment to ask anyone downvoting (people who were obviously disagreeing with the FACT that Reinoehl came from the other side of the street rather than from inside the garage in front of which the murder took place) to, instead of JUST disagreeing by downvoting, also reply and give me facts (which I obviously wasn't aware of) that could explain HOW that picture could fit the video evidence.

Thankfully, someone who probably didn't even downvote my original comment, did me a favor and replied at least letting me know that the picture was from the arrest warrant document, and gave me a link to it (the only thing this thread title says is "Bastard," without mentioning the origin of the picture, and I didn't know this document was available online).

After I read the arrest warrant, and again compared the video and the surveillance camera snapshots, NOW, not only did I confirm that the picture in this OP is real AND is NOT of Reinoehl inside the garage in front of which the murder took place, but I also now know how the picture fits the video, and know the whole sequence of events starting minutes before the murder.

1
leing15 1 point ago +1 / -0

One person or two people wearing the same clothes, maybe not, but everyone in the video of the murder and in the picture, does at least very strongly suggest that the video and the picture are from the same day.

However, thankfully, someone here did me a favor and replied at least letting me know that the picture was from the arrest warrant document, and gave me a link to it (the only thing this thread title says is "Bastard," without mentioning the origin of the picture, and I didn't know this document was available online).

After I read the arrest warrant, and again compared the video and the surveillance camera snapshots, NOW, not only did I confirm that the picture in this OP is real, is indeed from the same day of the video showing the murder, AND is NOT of Reinoehl inside the garage in front of which the murder took place, but I also now know how the picture fits the video, and know the whole sequence of events starting minutes before the murder.

0
leing15 0 points ago +1 / -1

I did NOT complain about downvotes. I mentioned that whoever was downvoting wasn't also writing me a reply to help me understand how that picture could be real, when it didn't seem to match video evidence.

After someone did me a favor and replied at least letting me know that the picture was from the arrest warrant papers (which I didn't even know were available online) and gave me a link to it, I read the arrest warrant, and again compared the video and the surveillance camera snapshots, and NOW, not only have I confirmed that the picture in this OP is real but is NOT of Reinoehl inside the garage in front of which the murder took place, but I know the whole sequence of events starting minutes before the murder.

Anyone has the right to disagree with anyone else's opinion, but I was pointing out the FACT that, according to video evidence, the picture in this OP couldn't possibly be showing Reinoehl inside the garage in front of which the murder happened, which is what everyone would assume when looking at the picture. So, I was hoping that anyone downvoting me for pointing out this fact would tell me, or at least help me figure out, how the picture and the video fit together, which I don't believe that the person/s who was downvoting my comments was doing.

My edit was about asking any downvoter to, instead of just downvoting, also to reply with facts (which clearly I wasn't aware of) that could explain how the picture could be real. It's like, if I comment that water is wet (which is a fact) and someone downvotes my comment, I can only assume that the downvoter disagrees, and I'd like the downvoter to also reply explaining why water isn't wet, instead of just downvoting. But if I say that apples are delicious, I understand that some people might downvote just because they don't like apples.

However, downvoting only takes a "click," and anyone can downvote for whatever grumpy, BS reason they want. While an actually valid reason, and in some instances, even a reply with a counter-argument and/or a relevant fact, would be nice, neither is required to make a click on the down arrow register as a downvote.

I, for example, downvoted you because you wrongly assumed my motivation to write that edit. But, at the same time, I understand that, while everyone likes the validation of upvotes, they are worth nothing, and downvotes don't mean anything, especially coming from people whom you don't know (even leftards come here to downvote all the time) and who don't know you either.

1
leing15 1 point ago +1 / -0

I understand and appreciate the appropriate correction. I don't like to be inaccurate either.

-1
leing15 -1 points ago +1 / -2

I suppose it is possible that the picture is from some other time, but that same night, because everyone involved seems to be wearing the same clothes. It's probably unlikely, but definitely possible. However, if the picture is real because it's from an earlier time, whoever got this picture online should at least be making that clear. It would still suggest that Reinoehl had possibly been stocking Danielson, but it wouldn't be evidence that, at the time of the murder, Reinoehl had been lying in wait to kill Danielson.

EDIT: After being informed that the picture is from an arrest warrant and being given a link to it, I now know the full context of the picture in this OP.
While this picture and the other pictures from the arrest-warrant are real, they also confirm that Reinoehel was not hiding inside the garage in front of which the murder took place - which is what anyone who watched the video of the moment of the murder would assume, without having the knowledge that the victim and his friend had just crossed the street seconds before the shooting (which is not shown in the video).

-3
leing15 -3 points ago +1 / -4

This picture can only be real if Danielson and Pappas passed by the same spot twice (and the first time Reinoehl was hiding inside that entrance but didn't shoot, or if this is a picture from some other location, and Reinoehl also decided not to shoot then, but got Danielson later. I find both of these possibilities unlikely, but certainly not impossible.

However, if this picture is supposed to show where Reinoehl was hiding just seconds before he shot Danielson, then the picture IS very fake.

EDIT: After being informed that the picture is from an arrest warrant and being given a link to it, I now know the full context of the picture in this OP.
While this picture and the other pictures from the arrest-warrant are real, they also confirm that Reinoehel was not hiding inside the garage in front of which the murder took place - which is what anyone who watched the video of the moment of the murder would assume, without having the knowledge that the victim and his friend had just crossed the street seconds before the shooting (which is not shown in the video).

3
leing15 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm always logged in to Youtube, but that is a great tip. Thanks!

9
leing15 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yes, in this much closer recording, the audio is much clearer. They really said "couple." I will fix my original comment and I won't quote them as saying "Trumper" anymore. However,we know they meant a "couple" of Trump supporters, or a couple of Patriot Prayer members (who are all Trump supporters just the same).

4
leing15 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, I do. And I guess it was Reinoehl who said that, but I still see him coming from across the street rather than from behind some gate or wall inside the parking garage entrance (or whatever that opening in front of which the murder took place is).

I believe they were hunting Trump supporters, and I believe there was an ambush, but based on the video, I don't see how this picture can be real.

EDIT: After being informed that the picture is from an arrest warrant and being given a link to it, I now know the full context of the picture in this OP.
While this picture and the other pictures from the arrest-warrant are real, they also confirm that Reinoehel was not hiding inside the garage in front of which the murder took place - which is what anyone who watched the video of the moment of the murder would assume, without having the knowledge that the victim and his friend had just crossed the street seconds before the shooting (which is not shown in the video).

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›