3
libman 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hopefully the Orthodox Jews will out-breed them, they voted >90% for Trump!

4
libman 4 points ago +4 / -0

Bullshit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judaism_and_abortion

There are arguments one way, arguments the other way, and Rabbis cherry-pick from whatever side they are biased for.

There is no major religion that has a clear internal agreement on abortion - not even communism. (Stalin banned it, while many before and after him encouraged it.)

All this disagreement is exactly why abortion-on-demand shouldn't be forced by the Federal government. This is an issue of separation of powers.

2
libman 2 points ago +2 / -0

The answer to "2 + 2" depends on the definition of "+" and the definition of the "2".

In a relatively free society, people tend to do what is practical. We interact with others for work (because free stuff doesn't fall from the sky) and pleasure (because it feels good). We use rational reasoning to solve problems (because it works). We use words to communicate meaning. And so we assume that "2" and "+" mean the same thing we've always known them to mean - no one has the power to change that.

But if you accept that the government is the ultimate source of truth, as our political opponents do, then anything is possible. "+" can mean different things at different seconds, in different rooms, etc. The very concept of "2" can be rendered meaningless with a thought-terminating cliché like "demonic", "anti-worker", "bourgeois", or "transphobic".

Of course the government has no reason to redefine arithmetic operators and integer literals - at least not yet. The book 1984 was an extreme imagining of an all-powerful government on a power trip, testing Party Members' absolute loyalty by making them claim things they obviously knew to be false.

Our government, in reality, merely profits from redefining words like "science", "rights", "infrastructure", "property", "regulation", "gender", "fake news", "pride", "hate"...

1
libman 1 point ago +1 / -0

The word "gender" used to mean same as "biological sex" - before the communists invented this bullshit for their own political profit.

So now they claim "gender" is just a social construct unrelated to biological sex. But then how can any opinion on anyone's gender be wrong?

I think I'm a sexy genius and a saint. Should calling me something else be a hate crime?

3
libman 3 points ago +3 / -0

Bank robbery being illegal is forced homelessness!!!1

1
libman 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the Federal government not dictating abortion on demand to all states is "forced pregnancy", then...

... the Federal government not dictating alcohol prohibition to all states is "forced intoxication"? 😜

1
libman 1 point ago +1 / -0

didn't even cause a broken window

Do you have any idea how much a pallet of bricks costs in the Biden economy?

2
libman 2 points ago +2 / -0

"I am a Democrat, like my father before me."

4
libman 4 points ago +4 / -0

We want Democrats to have abortions.

We just want them to have to move to communist shit-holes first.

6
libman 6 points ago +6 / -0

The "Fascist" SCOTUS limited the central government's power?

Yes, see, when Hitler came to power he was like: "Screw the Reich! No more orders from Berlin! Let every town in Germany decide for itself! " 🤣🤣🤣

2
libman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nothing more """fascist""" than restricting the power of the Federal government... 🤣🤣🤣

1
libman 1 point ago +1 / -0

But to get lynched for whistling at a white woman was a uniquely black problem lol.

Citation needed.

Go to the Middle East and start whistling at women from powerful families - you'll find out.

Those were the social norms in the West as well. Whistling at a woman was a serious matter. Someone willing to break the social taboo on whistling was more likely to rape her too.

You've wandered off from the topic of trying to justify the War Of Northern Aggression.

I just don't buy the theory the inbreds

The "inbreds" are in Afghanistan.

https://archive.ph/wip/ti5iO

It definitely doesn't apply to the upper-class US Southerners that could afford slaves. Most came from the British Isles, but those had much mixing of Celtic, Roman, Gallic, Nordic, and various Germanic bloodlines. Migration across the Atlantic Ocean had left them much less inbred than most parts of the world.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Southerners

would have e just gave up slavery after hundreds of years

That's just, like, your opinion, man.

The fact is that the Southern States had overwhelming support for secession, and had formally declared Independence - like the original so-called Thirteen Colonies seceding from King George. They were, by right, a foreign country.

Would Lincoln have been justified in invading Brazil for still having slavery too?!

Cuba? Ottoman Empire? China? Siam? Korea? Persia? Cambodia? Cameroon? Iceland? Etc...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_abolition_of_slavery_and_serfdom

without being forced to by heros like Sherman.

He's best known for murdering civilians.

Cool fact he had a tank named after him so he killed nazis and rebel scum.

Communism confirmed.

1
libman 1 point ago +1 / -0

More whores and faggots will move to commie urban shit-holes.

That means more "purple states" will turn Republican.

2
libman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah I'd bet turkey stays and Finland and Sweden join.

Did you bet against Brexit too?

Nations benefit from peace and trade, not a Eurocommie Jihad against Russia.

Joining is the only way to avoid a Russian invasion.

You have it backwards.

For 30+ years Russia looked for a peaceful solution to tens of millions of its people being stolen by a foreign country against their will - until NATO got serious about integrating Ukraine.

1
libman 1 point ago +1 / -0

They were never going to voluntarily end it. It was a way of life.

Stupid claim backed by nothing.

Slavery was a government program. A minority owned slaves, a majority competed with slaves for jobs, and everyone paid taxes to keep those slaves from escaping or rebelling.

Slavery ended in every other country without a Civil War - even the countries that were a lot more economically dependent on low-IQ agricultural labor than the US South.

Russia ended serfdom at the exact same time as US ending slavery. Everyone agreed that Labor Freedom was good for the economy.

Just look at Jim crow laws and kkk lynchings.

We are brainwashed by left-wing media to believe there was zero Black crime, and all punishment of Blacks was racist.

Lynchings were a tradition of frontier justice, not based on race. There were Black people lynching White criminals and being applauded by other Whites.

Yes, courts and due process is nice (though still not infallible). But, one way or another, society must find ways to defend Life and Property in order to function.

They really really didn't like joggers voting.

All the more reason to support sending them back to Africa.

1
libman 1 point ago +1 / -0

JDS reminder:

Not all Jews are communists.

Not all communists are Jews.

1
libman 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Japs wanted to stop the Soviet Union from filling the power vacuum in the FUBAR'ed China of the 20s and 30s. So they joined the Anti-ComIntern Pact with Hitler and Mussolini. (History has proven them right - communists took over China shortly after WW2.)

The alliance of Western Empires (USA, Britain, Netherlands, France) sided with the commies, initiated aggression, and blockaded Japan into food and fuel shortages. Pearl Harbor wasn't just provoked - it was deliberate bait!

Japan was then trying to end the war at every turn. USA refused to negotiate anything short of unconditional surrender and removing the Emperor, which would be a huge blow to Japan's conservative social order and bring it one step closer to falling into communism itself...

Good thing FDR died in 1945, or he would have given a slice of Japan to his dear boyfriend Stalin...

2
libman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tendies flair because Tendienomics 101.

Good Boy Points don't buy what they used to...

3
libman 3 points ago +3 / -0

NATO didn't gain anything yet.

The Scandies were already helping NATO squeeze Russia.

And the betting odds just jumped 9 points against expansion:

https://www.electionbettingodds.com/NATOExpansion2022.html

But, if they do formalize relations, that's another 16,000,000.

NATO lost Ukraine - original population 50,000,000.

They're about to lose Turkey - population 85,000,000.

Then possibly Hungary, Bulgaria, Greece...

EurAsian Union will offer more economic benefits without the mandatory faggotry.

1
libman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Slavery sucked for everyone. This included the vast majority of White people, who had to compete for labor with slaves.

With rising mechanization and public opinion turning against them, it was getting bad for the slave owners as well. Slaves were like employees that you paid for up-front and can't just simply fire.

Slavery is not free labor. The owners were responsible for feeding them, housing them, training them, providing them healthcare, etc. Public opinion of the time was very much against people who take bad care of their slaves. And there were escapes and slave revolts happening all over the place. Having higher-IQ employees who could be hired and fired based on merit became more profitable.

The South could have gotten a lot more $$$ by ending slavery the way other countries did. The British government was in debt for a very long time paying off the cost of freed slaves...

1
libman 1 point ago +1 / -0

The US Civil War was also about tax policy, states' rights, and empire.

Every country ended slavery when industrialization made it profitable to do so.

England was the first, countries like Brazil were the last. US North was more industrialized than the US South, but slavery was certain to end in another decade or two.

For a long time the primary promoter of the claim that it was all about slavery was Karl Marx.

1
libman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Retards like you never learn...

In 4 months Russia has destroyed the most powerful weapon invented in the past century - the Petrodollar.

Russia invaded a county of 50,000,000 (peak population) and the most battle-ready army in Europe, while utilizing less than 200,000 volunteer troops and didn't even have to mobilize their millions of draftees.

They are getting new Russian citizens as quickly as they can process them.

1
libman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Goodwill gestures don't work when people are brainwashed.

Enemy propaganda will spin it into their against-all-odds victory.

Like the "Miracle of the House of Brandenburg".

Or Dunkirk.

2
libman 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is why pro-choice libertarians like me still opposed Roe-v-Wade.

The Federal government exists to protect the border - and that's pretty much it.

view more: Next ›