It's a logical fallacy to substitute the Catholic church or Islamic instutitions in the place of "God" when making an argument for the pros and cons of "God".
For example if you pretend the tenants of the constitution were your "religious document" that set up your worldview and you completely agree with it, it doesn't mean that men who try to implement the constitution can't turn out to be tyrants. The men's implementation and the ideology are two different things.
A religion should be judged by it's core ideology.
God cannot be judged without first accepting His existence and even then who dares to do so. You can only accept or reject the existence for God. You cannot disprove or prove that which is beyond the physical. Hence metaphysics exists as an entire branch of philosophy.
Read the article... it doesn't really say much against climate change. It's just saying volcanoes were a previous cause now it's humans. This doesn't support anything really one way or another. It's more propagandized science.
Honestly the people who were involved in this should not be able to walk outside in public without ridicule, shaming and contempt being thrown in their faces. Treasonous elitists who spat on the faces of the people.
Man way to ruin the joke about him having a big reproductive organ.... but I agree his color has nothing to do with his character. I like the man. We need more people who are proud to be an American and stand up for what's right.