by geewiz
2
logan4179 2 points ago +2 / -0

Man, this is great and all, but I'm thinking "wtf, is there not already a minimum mandatory sentence for someone assaulting a police officer"?

2
logan4179 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, that Rand's a real cuck... being principled, standing up for your civil liberties, being staunchly pro 2nd ammendment, and an ally to Trump. You really know how to spot the "cucks"...

1
logan4179 1 point ago +1 / -0

FFS! You'd have a different administration with different rules. You really think the next leftist nutjob who's president won't have a broader approach to right-wing demonstrations?

3
logan4179 3 points ago +4 / -1

Thank you! This blows me away how many people on here would gladly give up civil liberties for the illusion of security. Out of all the swamp monsters to bitch about, these people pick Rand....? Especially when he's like the only member of congress actually doing anything about antifa and is unquestionably one of Trumps most effective allies?

6
logan4179 6 points ago +6 / -0

For Christs sake, Rand is not a bad guy. He does't "ree". He's not one of your swamp monsters.

2
logan4179 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's going to get to a point where they're rioting because of natural-cause deaths.

"YO TANESHA! THESE CRACKAS DIDN'T GIB JA-QUAN THEIR WHITE, MAGIC, ELIXER OF EVER-LASTING LIFE. TIME TO BURN A WENDY'S!"

2
logan4179 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are You Serious? - Bromide - ar·yoo·​see-reeee-yus | Definition of Are You Serious(Entry 2 of 2) transitive + intransitive

A liberal's preferred way to win an argument not by forming a coherent point, but rather, implying a deficiency in morality or character. Often said with a shrill shriek, it also serves the compound function of impugning the character of anyone not agreeing by the fact that no argument was formed implying that no argument is necessary because anyone reasonable would obviously feel the same way and if they don't, they must be immoral.

See also - "OhMaGod. Really!? In 2020?"

by geewiz
2
logan4179 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've never understood conservatives who talk about people leaving big cities and liberal states as though it's a good thing. I've always thought it was obvious that this would result in more liberal voters in conservative areas.

1
logan4179 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course he was very dissappointed to learn that she didn't have any children...

1
logan4179 1 point ago +1 / -0

I just think it's so funny. You could literally replace "Trump" with anyone's name. It's possibly the most generic, un-creative thing I've ever seen.