Personally I consider it one of those academic theories that some ivory tower dipshit conceived of. There's a rather horrific trend of misanthropic thought through intellectual circles that boils down to I Hate Humans.
China just jumped on the theory and pushed it hard. Now if you disagree you get thrown out.
They've been punting the cases like this using whatever reasoning they can make up. Also Trump appointee doesn't always mean they're going to rule with us. Can't have a 100% success rate with that considering how easy it is to subvert people.
No FEDERAL Law. Note the wording. The dismissal basically states that 'this is a federal court. You haven't presented evidence that federal laws are being broken. It's a bit of a mindbending ruling because it sort of sidesteps the actual issues the case is bringing up.
So, ah, here's a question. Has she ever been officially on the trump legal team? This seems like a sort of bureaucratic legal technical thing rather than some sort of declaration.
We'll get more clarification later if it's important I'd think.
Document hints of impropriety. If they screw up things that's something to bring up in court. If votes are not observed counted, I'm fairly sure that's a slam dunk. This is likely going to go to a court, so good clips of suspicious things will be better evidence. Note the time when you see it.
It's always good to confirm beforehand. In this case saying or even voting gets more commitment.