6
luckyfunk13 6 points ago +6 / -0

They don't read it to see IF it looks great. They read it to see WHAT they need to believe in.

10
luckyfunk13 10 points ago +10 / -0

I can't even tell if they believe the script they're reading or if they are that mentally unhinged.

2
luckyfunk13 2 points ago +2 / -0

Counter point - they shouldn't be on the FBI list because there shouldn't be an FBI.

(Pre-shill defense.mode.activated: “an“ is correct because F is phonetically pronounced as a vowel.)

2
luckyfunk13 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think it's that “they don't see it.“

My argument is "they can hold dissonant and mutually exclusive 'thoughts' because they don't really hold the 'thoughts.' They hold one thought - do what we demand."

This allows all sorts of logical dichotomies, because there are actually none. Just "do."

12
luckyfunk13 12 points ago +12 / -0

Not if they epstein themselves and vote Democrat for all eternity...

7
luckyfunk13 7 points ago +7 / -0

If we're the party of science, you have to conclude that one is necessary. Because experiments must be repeatable, two may be necessary. Three, though. Come on, man.

2
luckyfunk13 2 points ago +2 / -0

You don't. You go straight through it with prejudice. You don't "bypass" it. You gut it.

1
luckyfunk13 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then those that won't need to go on a leave of absence for 4 weeks. Any that stay have announced their loyalty and abandoned their oath. Patriots can stand down. Traitors can "show up to work."

13
luckyfunk13 13 points ago +13 / -0

I agree that they should be owned by the people. Although, I believe more strongly that we should not have voting machines. If the goal of machines was (ostensibly) to count faster so we knew outcome sooner, but every election results in WEEKS of additional counting, then nuke the machines. We could just count them by hand. Have 3 separate counters for each group and then make sure all 3 counts match.

1
luckyfunk13 1 point ago +1 / -0

Looks like a couple side plates hiding on that shelf. My carrier doesn't have side plate inserts, but they fit in the inside pockets of my laptop bag (5.11 rush), so I use my bag as a portable "at least I have some defense" carrier

Looks good!

3
luckyfunk13 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah. I was coming in to say "NSFW means someone left with fewer limbs, fewer teeth, or didn't leave." I didn't see any of that.

28
luckyfunk13 28 points ago +29 / -1

I read this as Australian and then thought my ability to understand language was broken. Like, I actually tried to concentrate on hearing English.

3
luckyfunk13 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah. Such a convenient "flaw." Almost like the system was built exactly to specifications that NO VOTER WOULD WANT but VOTE COUNTERS would pay a lot to have...

3
luckyfunk13 3 points ago +3 / -0

So, think about that for a second. Was he "better than the alternative" or was the wrapping paper just different?

This is the case with Bush sr., Bush jr., Romney, Jeb, McCain, etc. No different than Dukakis, Mondale, Clinton(s), Obama, Biden, and so on.

They're not RINOs, they're packaged globalists with the same ultimate agenda. It just gets executed with different levels of fanfare and theater.

2
luckyfunk13 2 points ago +2 / -0

The correct term is aproposish.

Ok, the made up word that would be apropos is apropoish.

5
luckyfunk13 5 points ago +6 / -1

To be fair, it's what an un-cucked AG looks like. Abbot is a mostly-cucked piece of shit. I say this as a Texan living in "omg, where's your mask" faggot-central of Plano.

2
luckyfunk13 2 points ago +2 / -0

I prefer to believe he said "now this is how you end it. High tech lynching, motherfucker. How about a real one, you dog diddler." But, "fuck you, biden" is succinct.

4
luckyfunk13 4 points ago +4 / -0

It depends on internals - most of the docs and manuals I've seen screenshots and pdfs of have referenced 'underlying Android os.'

If that's true of the machine, and not just tablet apps they were using to manage, then it should be Java code, which could either be compiled to byte-code (pre-compiled "close" to the os) or could be run through a native compiler, since they should all have similar/same os. Native would get a bit lower level.

If os isn't android, java is still "likely," but could be anything (within reason)

If it's a compiled language (probably, given performance wanted for ocr and image processing), the code would still be decompilable. Not as easy to read, but you can still see what's going on.

If it's runtime interpreted (and not obfuscated) it's just code and easy to read. If it's obfuscated, it's easier to follow than decompiler source, but pretty much the same.

If it is secured and signed, it may not be decompilable (easily) but once something is loaded into memory, you can get at it and reverse out what's going on.

In any case, anything that does "something" with input does have some form of code on it. It's all about how you want to get at it and if you define that as "code"

6
luckyfunk13 6 points ago +6 / -0

And, since we're talking 9/11 style, Dominion flipping looks like one of those bipartisan inside jobs... hopefully this analysis will give us a building 7 of data.

5
luckyfunk13 5 points ago +5 / -0

Stevie Wonder walks into a shop swinging a dog above his head.

The shop owner says "Can I help you?"

"No, I'm just having a look around."

9
luckyfunk13 9 points ago +9 / -0

This is hilarious. The NRA is never first to anything...

view more: Next ›